An example of how shills are pushing pedophilia as a libertarian issue on Voat.

An example of how shills are pushing pedophilia as a libertarian issue on Voat. (realProtectVoat)

submitted 7.2 years ago by freshmeat

Firstly let me state this is an ongoing issue I have had with Voat since my arrival here over 2 years ago and I've lost accounts for calling out the pedophiles and their enablers (/u/ Kevdude and /u/ Crensch and every user at /v/SoapBoxBanHammer protect the pedos, defending their posts under the argument of freedom of expression since it isn't showing full nudity, completely ignoring the fact it is still sexualizing underage persons)

Many others have noticed this in the past and gets attacked, harassed, and slandered for pointing it out.

The admins claim they don't want to take a moral stand and only want to deal with legality regarding banning. This makes you wonder who is he worried about upsetting by getting rid of the pedo subverses?

maybe this has something to do with it

Notice how "popular" voaters are actually encouraging the pedophilia in the top comment.

lulz guise iz jus trollin

By leaving pedophilia on Voat the admins are choosing a side and not simply remaining a neutral authority. This is of concern because pedophiles are in a hardcore campaign right now to make pedophilia a libertarian issue so they can have a clueless support base when laws are inevitably changed to apply to the internet. They know they are able to operate out in the open under temporary loopholes in old laws and want to get as many people on their side before it changes. LGBT community already supports them (and many in LGBT are pedophiles themselves) and now they are getting Libertarian goats to defend their depravity and it's working. I believe there are a lot more closeted homosexuals on this site than people admit, so many people see the pedophilia issue and jump to defend it, seemingly behaving as a Libertarian or even right-wing.

The argument is immediately diverted into a freedom issue instead of ignoring the obvious: It's sexualizing children.

122 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gamepwn 7.2 years ago

I remember being temporarily banned for bringing this up and having a fight with the moderators. Hecho, Crensh, alot of pedophile mods and subverses. Hecho runs multiple pedophile subverses.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2079341

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2082861/10273281

link

oftotc 7.2 years ago

I do not believe that you are really so dull as to not understand a such simple voat concept, but crensch said it best:

It has FUCK-ALL to do with PG, read the goddamn sidebar you fucking dweeb

But allying w/ freshmeat shows you're just concern-trolling. Have fun with that ;-)

link

gamepwn 7.2 years ago

Voat, the home of the Pizzagate community, should not have pedophile content on it. That includes drawings of child rape and photos being shared of little girls in bikinis and their underwear because "its technically not illegal". Fuck you pedophile

link

TheBuddha 7.2 years ago

I'd like to take a moment to point out that the pedos were here before you PG folks.

No, I don't condone their activities, but what they do appears to be legal which means I don't get worked up about it.

link

oftotc 7.2 years ago

I defend PG from cunts like you all the time fucktard. But you're too stupid to figure that out and just parrot your bitch-master freshmeat. You attack specifically to distract away from PG evidence and are so persistent about it, I suspect you're paid to do it. You're an intel-whore who aids those kid-fuckers by creating forum-drama. Fuck off.

link

gamepwn 7.2 years ago

I have 45 submissions to Pizzagate, two that were put as share. You have 0, and are actually defending the right to "legal" pedophile content. Like I said if it makes you angry that normal people look with pure disgust that there are pedophile subverses on Voat with people jacking off to little girls in their underwear and drawn pictures of baby rape you must be a pedo to. I just saw that at least another Voat user brought it up because many good people left this year due to sick fucks like you and TheBuddha above me defending pedophile content.

link

oftotc 7.2 years ago

You have 45 posts talking mostly about other child-sex crimes that should have been removed from PG. You can post about the child-sex crime epidemic pretty much anywhere on voat and get lots of support - including mine. PG is for PG data, not every instance of child-sex crime that shows up in the news. Only a muslim or jew would try to equate defending freedom of speech with being a pedophile.

link

freshmeat 7.2 years ago

PG itself100% legit, the subverse is on Voat is100% controlled by opposition. That is a distinction that needs to be made.

Pedos run that subverse. There will be no justice for PG when it is ran by the enemy.

link

oftotc 7.2 years ago

Only a muslim or jew would try to equate defending freedom of speech with being a pedophile.

link

gamepwn 7.2 years ago

Italian/Puerto Rican, but nice try. Your pedophilia isn't free speech asshole. Even if our fucked up Government is ok with you and your fellow ecko's getting yourself off to little girls in their underwear I bet you 90 percent of us would rather you and your kind rot in a coffin.

link

oftotc 7.2 years ago

Your pedophilia isn't free speech asshole.

Holy shit! Proven time after time after time: the loudest voices are shouting to cover their own perversion. You are a confirmed pedo. Holy shit.

link

gamepwn 7.2 years ago

Only a pedophile would say drawn child rape and jacking off to pictures of children in their underwear is free speech. Its not. It shouldent be on this website you fucked up dirtbag.