@theoldones has posted more links to "offensive" cartoons than anyone else on Voat.

He does it almost every day from what I have seen.

And regarding posts that have been found not to be pedo-related, even upon request of those cartoons to be examined as possible violation of Voat's user agreement. So the matter is well settled; cartoons posted on Voat are not pedo-related or CP, as theoldones has claimed.

His further arguments have no merit because they are based on well settled questions that do not support his position.

Those who regurgitate the same arguments also have no merit.

These people just don't like the conclusions already made....so they try to re-argue. Its not appropriate to do so. That's just how things work in a rational world. But they are not rational. They're crazy. Plain and simple.

I'm always dealing with judicial arguments ... these people have no clue how to prove anything.

They need to understand that proclamations are not evidence.

And they refuse to accept that Voat rules do not allow for pedo related posts ; so anything posted is presumed to be not pedo-related.

Its only usually people at v/antipedosquad that sees stuff that is posted as being pedo-related. This is evidence that they are pedos ?

What is posted on Voat is free speech, not CP or pedo-related, as the rules of Voat prohibit such postings.

The anti-pedo-squad sub's members has tried, and failed, to get certain classes of cartoons to be deemed unacceptable at Voat. This is what (((they))) complain about again and again as if saying it 100x somehow changes the character of a lolli (which I have blocked and (((they))) are free to also block or ignore) from free speech to violating any Voat rule.

What's a definition of crazy ? Doing the same thing multiple times and expecting different results.

@maggotbait88 dropped a soft admission dortex is his alt. please ALSO refer to this evidence post

wants the age of consent to be 13 and younger: https://web.archive.org/web/20190611051457/https://voat.co/v/whatever/3270549/

Throughout history men have married women younger than themselves. Only recently have feminists implemented and continually raised the age of consent with the help of Jews. This protects feminists who want to ride the cock carousel and fulfills the Jews desire to exterminate white people by narrowing potential mates for men to only washed up hags. If you support a higher AOC you are anti-white

-maggotbait88

then says it ought to be even younger: https://archive.fo/3zVSb

That's a good point it could be lower

-maggotbait88

NSFL pedophilic text copypasta: https://archive.fo/IjUPB

-maggotbait88

more pedo proof: https://files.catbox.moe/ycuzqr.png

profile info: https://archive.fo/TQU9U

116 submissions to SFWLoli, 85 submissions to SFWLolicon, 34 submissions to loli.

(he also moderates a loli sub for posting porn of cartoon kids. v/SFWLoli)

example of one of his loli posts: https://archive.fo/iNsBs

an even more fucked up example of his loli posts: https://archive.fo/QKjDg

REGARDING LOLI IN REGARDS TO THIS PACK OF PEDOPHILES, from a comment by @truthdefender

thelma, where you use and accept Merriam-Webster, consider their entry on pedophilia:

Definition of pedophilia

sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object

While law may be your area, this is not a legal term. It is very likely Aged is a pedophile.

Consider his submission statistics, which were brought up here:

Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

2335 submissions to loli

2276 submissions to lolicon

Wikipedia describes lolicon consistently with the Webster definition on pedophilia:

Lolicon

Lolicon (ロリコン rorikon), also romanized as lolikon or rorikon, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex";^[1] it describes an attraction to young or prepubescent girls.

He has 2335 + 2276 = 4611 submissions to those two loli subs alone. Four thousand six hundred eleven, to just those two. That doesn't even count his posts to other pedophile subs. This proves a relentless dedication to posting pedophile content. You have had your account for two years, are one of the more active goats, and he's submitted more to only those two subs than you submitted in total. His submission is also constant: when I look at the last two weeks of his submissions, I see many per day, every day, going back for the last two weeks. I reasonably generalize that this pattern continues.

He's widely recognized by Voat goats as a pedophile: I haven't seen this ever contested or controversial and for good reasons. @carlip, the owner of /v/PedosOnVoat, states so here and links this post depicting what may be Aged admitting to watching live-action child pornography. @gabara often mocks Aged for this, like here: so often that he's done so as recently as today, and before that three days ago with a meme of Pedobear. Others often do similar: that is from 9 days ago, and here's another by Buddha dated 15 days ago. He gets posts made about him in /v/ProtectVoat: here's one 10 days ago. I could go on.

Here he comments in the pedo sub /v/loli to his fellow pedophile fuark_auf, who theoldones helped drive out from Voat, "You need to teach bitches to learn their place when they are young." He has many submissions to /v/youngladies, a child sexualization subverse, like this one with the title "She is twelve," or this one that's called "Denise Party Girls 94." He sexualizes kids as young as 5, with understandable outrage by @ESOTERICshade and others, including this separate topic by Conspirologist. He has been accused of deleting inculpatory submissions and has posted sexualized underage cartoons to the default sub /v/gaming. He was called out by @Mumbleberry and others for this. He pedophiles so often that @Splooge has suspected him of SCP farming.

That should be sufficient evidence Aged is a pedophile. He doesn't just keep his pedophilia in his head either: he spams child sexualization so often on Voat it seems like it's his life's devotion. This can lead others to do harm: consider this review of over 35 scientific studies that report findings consistent with significant escalation in people's porn use. For lolicon, the escalation may be to child porn. Aged also enables pedos to find each other.

If we must talk law, there are speech issues that lolicon does present. If you browse this article on the legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors, you'll notice it's illegal in Australia, Canada, the Philippines, South Africa, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. That's 5 of the 18 listed, or 28 percent of them. If there's loli that slips through here and there, Voat will probably be fine. If you have thousands upon thousands of submissions, in subverse after subverse, legal cases might be made in some of these countries this is a Voat problem and Voat might get banned there. People in these countries would then lose their freedom to speak on here, which most here wouldn't consider good.

Consider also this is /v/AntiPedoSquad. From what I see, your comments here are similar to theoldones going to your sub /v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay to inform you the people who you post there as pieces of shit have done nothing illegal.

Summary: it's fair to call Aged a pedo as he's a big pedo. Don't trust him around your kids.

Pls define "pedophile".

Pls define age below/above for legal consent.

Pls define legal age gap parameters. Eg, 10 yr old + 10 yr old intercourse, is that legal? 10 yr old + 15 yr old intercourse, is that legal?

You need to be more specific. Perhaps place a sticky linking to legal references defining the above, so we're not operating on MUH MORAL FEELS like christcuck bots.

@Blacksmith21 @Shizie @Darkknight111 @Gamepwn

Please see post. @Maggotbait88 is a perv too. Check out where he posts.

" /v/AntiPedoSquad is your friend."

Just trust us!

OP is a sexual degenerate who is attracted to used up sluts and is 100% willing to abandon ALL of his principles for his pursuit of schizophrenic pussy.