"jailbaitanon" screams some red flags. this was one of their tricks, they post only clothed pictures of kids where the obvious intent is sexualization, but because clothes, it slips in through a loophole
loopholes only work when people don't know their being exploited, though, so i should probably mention this one
yeah, becuase the new sub needs content i'm just digging up all the old pedo expose posts i've posted in the past
Lolicon (ロリコン rorikon), also romanized as lolikon or rorikon, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. The term lolicon is a portmanteau of the phrase "Lolita complex";[1] it describes an attraction to young or prepubescent girls.
He has 2335 + 2276 = 4611 submissions to those two loli subs alone. Four thousand six hundred eleven, to just those two. That doesn't even count his posts to other pedophile subs. This proves a relentless dedication to posting pedophile content. You have had your account for two years, are one of the more active goats, and he's submitted more to only those two subs than you submitted in total. His submission is also constant: when I look at the last two weeks of his submissions, I see many per day, every day, going back for the last two weeks. I reasonably generalize that this pattern continues.
He's widely recognized by Voat goats as a pedophile: I haven't seen this ever contested or controversial and for good reasons. @carlip, the owner of /v/PedosOnVoat, states so here and links this post depicting what may be Aged admitting to watching live-action child pornography. @gabara often mocks Aged for this, like here: so often that he's done so as recently as today, and before that three days ago with a meme of Pedobear. Others often do similar: that is from 9 days ago, and here's another by Buddha dated 15 days ago. He gets posts made about him in /v/ProtectVoat: here's one 10 days ago. I could go on.
That should be sufficient evidence Aged is a pedophile. He doesn't just keep his pedophilia in his head either: he spams child sexualization so often on Voat it seems like it's his life's devotion. This can lead others to do harm: consider this review of over 35 scientific studies that report findings consistent with significant escalation in people's porn use. For lolicon, the escalation may be to child porn. Aged also enables pedos to find each other.
If we must talk law, there are speech issues that lolicon does present. If you browse this article on the legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors, you'll notice it's illegal in Australia, Canada, the Philippines, South Africa, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. That's 5 of the 18 listed, or 28 percent of them. If there's loli that slips through here and there, Voat will probably be fine. If you have thousands upon thousands of submissions, in subverse after subverse, legal cases might be made in some of these countries this is a Voat problem and Voat might get banned there. People in these countries would then lose their freedom to speak on here, which most here wouldn't consider good.
Consider also this is /v/AntiPedoSquad. From what I see, your comments here are similar to theoldones going to your sub /v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay to inform you the people who you post there as pieces of shit have done nothing illegal.
Summary: it's fair to call Aged a pedo as he's a big pedo. Don't trust him around your kids.
Posted automatically (#50480) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Posted automatically (#50311) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Posted automatically (#50301) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
Is not meant to harass fellow goats. All what most people do is name a celeb. or politician or Paul Simon. And calling someone a POS has never been seen to be, by itself, defamation.
Of all technically accurate terms to describe a pedophile, one of such camaraderie as "fellow goat" wouldn't top my list, but to each their own.
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. If someone looks at what I evidenced above and concludes "Aged isn't a pedophile," that's likely in bad faith. Were I on trial and were there a need, I could make what I wrote fifty times as long.
You can't resist that opportunity to plug /v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay, I see. I'm just teasing to defuse tension. I often agree with you but I doubt I will on all this.
That's not exactly true .. you can say all true things and still be guilty of defamation...as long as the implication is there that someone committed a crime.
Plus, you may win your case and spend 40K obtaining that win. Is that "winning"?
I showed Aged to be a pedophile, not a criminal. I'm not guilty of anything but defending the truth. Anyone can file frivolous lawsuits against anyone for anything: I refuse to let alarmist fears over vexatious litigation shut me up on the facts. If I wanted a gag in my mouth, I'd go to Reddit.
You have a passion to defend others. I depart with the suggestion you reorient that to someone who isn't the biggest pedophile on Voat.
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
That appears to be accurate.
Not CP tho.
Make your own individual assessment of the person as you wish.
I simply just don't go there myself.
theoldones ago
"jailbaitanon" screams some red flags. this was one of their tricks, they post only clothed pictures of kids where the obvious intent is sexualization, but because clothes, it slips in through a loophole
loopholes only work when people don't know their being exploited, though, so i should probably mention this one
yeah, becuase the new sub needs content i'm just digging up all the old pedo expose posts i've posted in the past
thelma ago
Well when you take your thread and the sub its in, it implies that you are calling a user a pedophile.
Do you anything to show that the user was convicted in a court of law of anything related to such a subject matter ?
Its not a "loophole". Its the law. Don't like it ? Change the law. I work to change laws I don't like.
TruthDefender ago
thelma, where you use and accept Merriam-Webster, consider their entry on pedophilia:
While law may be your area, this is not a legal term. It is very likely Aged is a pedophile.
Consider his submission statistics, which were brought up here:
Wikipedia describes lolicon consistently with the Webster definition on pedophilia:
He has 2335 + 2276 = 4611 submissions to those two loli subs alone. Four thousand six hundred eleven, to just those two. That doesn't even count his posts to other pedophile subs. This proves a relentless dedication to posting pedophile content. You have had your account for two years, are one of the more active goats, and he's submitted more to only those two subs than you submitted in total. His submission is also constant: when I look at the last two weeks of his submissions, I see many per day, every day, going back for the last two weeks. I reasonably generalize that this pattern continues.
He's widely recognized by Voat goats as a pedophile: I haven't seen this ever contested or controversial and for good reasons. @carlip, the owner of /v/PedosOnVoat, states so here and links this post depicting what may be Aged admitting to watching live-action child pornography. @gabara often mocks Aged for this, like here: so often that he's done so as recently as today, and before that three days ago with a meme of Pedobear. Others often do similar: that is from 9 days ago, and here's another by Buddha dated 15 days ago. He gets posts made about him in /v/ProtectVoat: here's one 10 days ago. I could go on.
Here he comments in the pedo sub /v/loli to his fellow pedophile fuark_arf, who theoldones helped drive out from Voat, "You need to teach bitches to learn their place when they are young." He has many submissions to /v/youngladies, a child sexualization subverse, like this one with the title "She is twelve," or this one that's called "Denise Party Girls 94." He sexualizes kids as young as 5, with understandable outrage by @ESOTERICshade and others, including this separate topic by Conspirologist. He has been accused of deleting inculpatory submissions and has posted sexualized underage cartoons to the default sub /v/gaming. He was called out by @Mumbleberry and others for this. He pedophiles so often that @Splooge has suspected him of SCP farming.
That should be sufficient evidence Aged is a pedophile. He doesn't just keep his pedophilia in his head either: he spams child sexualization so often on Voat it seems like it's his life's devotion. This can lead others to do harm: consider this review of over 35 scientific studies that report findings consistent with significant escalation in people's porn use. For lolicon, the escalation may be to child porn. Aged also enables pedos to find each other.
If we must talk law, there are speech issues that lolicon does present. If you browse this article on the legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors, you'll notice it's illegal in Australia, Canada, the Philippines, South Africa, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. That's 5 of the 18 listed, or 28 percent of them. If there's loli that slips through here and there, Voat will probably be fine. If you have thousands upon thousands of submissions, in subverse after subverse, legal cases might be made in some of these countries this is a Voat problem and Voat might get banned there. People in these countries would then lose their freedom to speak on here, which most here wouldn't consider good.
Consider also this is /v/AntiPedoSquad. From what I see, your comments here are similar to theoldones going to your sub /v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay to inform you the people who you post there as pieces of shit have done nothing illegal.
Summary: it's fair to call Aged a pedo as he's a big pedo. Don't trust him around your kids.
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagate comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#50480) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/ProtectGoats comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#50311) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/whatever comment by @Crensch.
Posted automatically (#50301) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@TruthDefender: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @Crensch)
thelma ago
/v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay
Is not meant to harass fellow goats. All what most people do is name a celeb. or politician or Paul Simon. And calling someone a POS has never been seen to be, by itself, defamation.
TruthDefender ago
Most comments on page 1 of its /new aim at goats and you advised similar here.
On that harassment you wrote:
Of all technically accurate terms to describe a pedophile, one of such camaraderie as "fellow goat" wouldn't top my list, but to each their own.
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. If someone looks at what I evidenced above and concludes "Aged isn't a pedophile," that's likely in bad faith. Were I on trial and were there a need, I could make what I wrote fifty times as long.
You can't resist that opportunity to plug /v/PieceOfShitOfTheDay, I see. I'm just teasing to defuse tension. I often agree with you but I doubt I will on all this.
thelma ago
Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.
That's not exactly true .. you can say all true things and still be guilty of defamation...as long as the implication is there that someone committed a crime.
Plus, you may win your case and spend 40K obtaining that win. Is that "winning"?
TruthDefender ago
I showed Aged to be a pedophile, not a criminal. I'm not guilty of anything but defending the truth. Anyone can file frivolous lawsuits against anyone for anything: I refuse to let alarmist fears over vexatious litigation shut me up on the facts. If I wanted a gag in my mouth, I'd go to Reddit.
You have a passion to defend others. I depart with the suggestion you reorient that to someone who isn't the biggest pedophile on Voat.