"jailbaitanon" screams some red flags. this was one of their tricks, they post only clothed pictures of kids where the obvious intent is sexualization, but because clothes, it slips in through a loophole
loopholes only work when people don't know their being exploited, though, so i should probably mention this one
yeah, becuase the new sub needs content i'm just digging up all the old pedo expose posts i've posted in the past
Posted automatically (#50546) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
Posted automatically (#50481) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
There are literally thousands of pedos CONVICTED every day.
Why not discuss those confirmed cases of pedophilia related crimes?
Or are you wishing to highlight young girls who model bikinis and what not be outlawed from their pictures being taken ?
Even you note that the pics are sexual in nature so you must have some degree of pedophilia , yes ? Otherwise you would not see them as sexually suggestive. Or you don't and just want to show links to pics that you think would indicate that a viewer has pedo tendencies ? I think that this maybe more accurate but, really, I cannot read your mind and I doubt you would ID yourself as a pedo.
^^ So I went over and this is one post that you don't like people looking at (although you also show people exactly where to look, right?)
I don't find this objectionable. Its a asian girl (age? Who knows, with asians she might be 40) that looks young. Its a girl in a swimsuit. Wow. I have seen racier young girls in my Sears catalogs.
I would not call someone a pedo for posting a link to that pic, or all the ones I looked at in that sub.
I think your efforts maybe better spent seeking new laws than posting on voat about people who post such pics. Clearly they are legal to post.
Is it right to continually harass a person for doing something that's legal ? Since we are talking what is right / wrong and not legalities....
Really there are actual criminals you could be reporting on.
And the relief you are seeking is to make laws that would make the posting of such pics illegal. You can certainly ask fellow goats to support you in such efforts.
So now you are saying that people you name as doing criminal act, as you wish to define them but the law does not, deserve a bullet to the head.
Interesting.
That is likely not going to result in any positive outcome for you but only negative outcomes.
As I said before, if you want to stop people posting such pics you need to change the law. Its inappropriate what you are doing.
If you think someone is posting CP then you should contact law enforcement if anything. LEOs have something called IMMUNITY and you have some immunity too when you contact LEOs with reasonable complaints; I cannot say that contacting police with false or frivolous complaints will offer you any protection, you would need to consult with that jurisdiction's laws and case law.
Noble as you think you are being, you'll likely cross a line into defamation or close enough to it where the "target" sues. What's going to be your defense "He posted what he legally could, your honor." That does not sound like a promising legal argument. Does it?
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
That appears to be accurate.
Not CP tho.
Make your own individual assessment of the person as you wish.
I simply just don't go there myself.
theoldones ago
"jailbaitanon" screams some red flags. this was one of their tricks, they post only clothed pictures of kids where the obvious intent is sexualization, but because clothes, it slips in through a loophole
loopholes only work when people don't know their being exploited, though, so i should probably mention this one
yeah, becuase the new sub needs content i'm just digging up all the old pedo expose posts i've posted in the past
thelma ago
Well when you take your thread and the sub its in, it implies that you are calling a user a pedophile.
Do you anything to show that the user was convicted in a court of law of anything related to such a subject matter ?
Its not a "loophole". Its the law. Don't like it ? Change the law. I work to change laws I don't like.
theoldones ago
where there's smoke there's fire
the intent of the pictures is quite clearly pornography
thelma ago
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jailbait
Jailbait defined.
Jailbait does not equal CP. It just describes the age of a girl.
I don't need to look at subs he subscribes to as Putt does not allow CP subs.
Unless you have more than this then your argument that the user has CP issues is without merit,
I guess you have no judicial decision related to the user related to the subject matter of CP.
I block lollicon stuff. That stuff is out there. But I don't consider it to be CP.
I can look at the lolli subs and see who subscribes if I wanted to ... what is your end goal here ?
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagatemods comment by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#50546) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
SearchVoatBot ago
This comment was linked from this v/pizzagate comment by @theoldones.
Posted automatically (#50481) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@thelma: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @theoldones)
theoldones ago
exposing a pedophile.
thelma ago
There are literally thousands of pedos CONVICTED every day.
Why not discuss those confirmed cases of pedophilia related crimes?
Or are you wishing to highlight young girls who model bikinis and what not be outlawed from their pictures being taken ?
Even you note that the pics are sexual in nature so you must have some degree of pedophilia , yes ? Otherwise you would not see them as sexually suggestive. Or you don't and just want to show links to pics that you think would indicate that a viewer has pedo tendencies ? I think that this maybe more accurate but, really, I cannot read your mind and I doubt you would ID yourself as a pedo.
https://voat.co/v/JailbaitAnon/2383071
^^ So I went over and this is one post that you don't like people looking at (although you also show people exactly where to look, right?)
I don't find this objectionable. Its a asian girl (age? Who knows, with asians she might be 40) that looks young. Its a girl in a swimsuit. Wow. I have seen racier young girls in my Sears catalogs.
I would not call someone a pedo for posting a link to that pic, or all the ones I looked at in that sub.
I think your efforts maybe better spent seeking new laws than posting on voat about people who post such pics. Clearly they are legal to post.
theoldones ago
even if it's legal, is it right?
if "no", then you know the reason why. it's pedophiles exploiting loopholes. YOU go change the laws maybe, eh?
thelma ago
Is it right to continually harass a person for doing something that's legal ? Since we are talking what is right / wrong and not legalities....
Really there are actual criminals you could be reporting on.
And the relief you are seeking is to make laws that would make the posting of such pics illegal. You can certainly ask fellow goats to support you in such efforts.
theoldones ago
THEY ARE PEDOPHILES
they deserve bullets and the fucking rope.
thelma ago
wow. you are off the rails. thought police is a thing now?
theoldones ago
this isn't thought policing. pedophilia is a serious crime, and signs like this are respectfully red flags
"jailbait" + kids photos go with pedos
pedos go with "jailbait" + kids photos
this is basic occums razor.
thelma ago
pedophilia is a serious crime
Please cite a law. I don't think it is a crime. I cannot find one.
theoldones ago
https://infogalactic.com/info/Child_sexual_abuse_laws_in_the_United_States
here's fucking several.
thelma ago
And none of these are an actual law.
I have not seen a criminal law in the USA making something you simply think or feel to be illegal.
I have no pity for any rapist. I think that is not what you're claiming.
YoHomie ago
Thelma is operating on reason, you are operating on emotion. Only one of those strategies typically works or has any effect. Think that through.
theoldones ago
it's not "emotion" to say pedophiles deserve a bullet, that's basic pest control.
thelma ago
So now you are saying that people you name as doing criminal act, as you wish to define them but the law does not, deserve a bullet to the head.
Interesting.
That is likely not going to result in any positive outcome for you but only negative outcomes.
As I said before, if you want to stop people posting such pics you need to change the law. Its inappropriate what you are doing.
If you think someone is posting CP then you should contact law enforcement if anything. LEOs have something called IMMUNITY and you have some immunity too when you contact LEOs with reasonable complaints; I cannot say that contacting police with false or frivolous complaints will offer you any protection, you would need to consult with that jurisdiction's laws and case law.
Noble as you think you are being, you'll likely cross a line into defamation or close enough to it where the "target" sues. What's going to be your defense "He posted what he legally could, your honor." That does not sound like a promising legal argument. Does it?