I'm always dealing with judicial arguments ... these people have no clue how to prove anything.
They need to understand that proclamations are not evidence.
And they refuse to accept that Voat rules do not allow for pedo related posts ; so anything posted is presumed to be not pedo-related.
Its only usually people at v/antipedosquad that sees stuff that is posted as being pedo-related. This is evidence that they are pedos ?
What is posted on Voat is free speech, not CP or pedo-related, as the rules of Voat prohibit such postings.
The anti-pedo-squad sub's members has tried, and failed, to get certain classes of cartoons to be deemed unacceptable at Voat. This is what (((they))) complain about again and again as if saying it 100x somehow changes the character of a lolli (which I have blocked and (((they))) are free to also block or ignore) from free speech to violating any Voat rule.
What's a definition of crazy ? Doing the same thing multiple times and expecting different results.
First off, I'm the the USA . So I would give the weight of any other country law and case law (don't quote laws w/o case law ~ with free speech issues, this is usually explained in case law) an appropriate amount of weight.
view the rest of the comments →
thelma ago
I'm always dealing with judicial arguments ... these people have no clue how to prove anything.
They need to understand that proclamations are not evidence.
And they refuse to accept that Voat rules do not allow for pedo related posts ; so anything posted is presumed to be not pedo-related.
Its only usually people at v/antipedosquad that sees stuff that is posted as being pedo-related. This is evidence that they are pedos ?
What is posted on Voat is free speech, not CP or pedo-related, as the rules of Voat prohibit such postings.
The anti-pedo-squad sub's members has tried, and failed, to get certain classes of cartoons to be deemed unacceptable at Voat. This is what (((they))) complain about again and again as if saying it 100x somehow changes the character of a lolli (which I have blocked and (((they))) are free to also block or ignore) from free speech to violating any Voat rule.
What's a definition of crazy ? Doing the same thing multiple times and expecting different results.
theoldones ago
loli is explicitly illegal in certain countries as a form of CP.
thelma ago
I doubt you are a suitable person to talk about laws. Your lack of knowledge has been clearly demonstrated.
That, and your crazy.
theoldones ago
should i quote some law about loli being illegal CP?
canada is the country i now off the top of my head, but there's probably more
thelma ago
First off, I'm the the USA . So I would give the weight of any other country law and case law (don't quote laws w/o case law ~ with free speech issues, this is usually explained in case law) an appropriate amount of weight.