Pedophile attempting to hijack this forum. Please be aware of who you are speaking with! Go to /v/AntiPedoSquad and familiarize yourself with those usernames! (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Crensch

User @Dortex and his merry band of LITERAL PEDOPHILES are trying to astroturf here. Case in point.

Familiarize yourselves with users like Thelma and maggotbait88 and the others that associate with them. /v/AntiPedoSquad is your friend.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

theoldones ago

@maggotbait88 dropped a soft admission dortex is his alt. please ALSO refer to this evidence post

wants the age of consent to be 13 and younger: https://web.archive.org/web/20190611051457/https://voat.co/v/whatever/3270549/

Throughout history men have married women younger than themselves. Only recently have feminists implemented and continually raised the age of consent with the help of Jews. This protects feminists who want to ride the cock carousel and fulfills the Jews desire to exterminate white people by narrowing potential mates for men to only washed up hags. If you support a higher AOC you are anti-white

-maggotbait88

then says it ought to be even younger: https://archive.fo/3zVSb

That's a good point it could be lower

-maggotbait88

NSFL pedophilic text copypasta: https://archive.fo/IjUPB

-maggotbait88

more pedo proof: https://files.catbox.moe/ycuzqr.png

profile info: https://archive.fo/TQU9U

116 submissions to SFWLoli, 85 submissions to SFWLolicon, 34 submissions to loli.

(he also moderates a loli sub for posting porn of cartoon kids. v/SFWLoli)

example of one of his loli posts: https://archive.fo/iNsBs

an even more fucked up example of his loli posts: https://archive.fo/QKjDg

thelma ago

Your continual postings are making you look crazy, you know ?

theoldones ago

why do you run defense for pedophiles so much?

i had to ban your ass after you tried posting a picture of a real child at my face

thelma ago

Wahhhhhhhhhhhh.

Free speech.

You hate it, I get it.

That and your crazy ... of course.

theoldones ago

i hate pedophiles, i love free speech, how fucking dare you try to use a great thing to defend a horrible thing.

thelma ago

Can you point to a judicial decision that has stated that anything posted (ie specific to a specific lolli item posted) in the various lolli subs has been deemed anything other than an expression of free speech.

Provide me with a court memorandum of decision.

theoldones ago

"is it legal or illegal"

nigger, this is pedophiles we're dealing with. you spend all day defending horrible people and trying to frame use for federal crimes.

thelma ago

The loli posted on Voat has been asked to be reviewed. Yes? And it appears to been deemed free speech. Yes?

Protect Kids: You agree not to post any child pornography or sexually suggestive content involving minors.

Voat user agreement ^^^^

theoldones ago

also in the user agreement:

YOU AGREE TO NOT POST SEXUALLY EXPLICIT DEPICTION OF CHILDREN

thelma ago

This has already been settled. You just don't like the answer that your group got.

Move onto something else. Or keep posting about convicted defendants like you have been doing.

You appear to be crazy. Arguing and arguing over already settled matters. That's crazy.