You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

lopus ago

I always thought that Q was already around when Pizzagate emerged... and maybe "helped" spreading it....

Vindicator ago

Having seen probably thousands of posts of both info and disinfo since October 2016 when Wikileaks dropped the Podesta emails, I would say we have been witnessing a sophisticated communication campaign that began with FBIAnon's leaks on /pol/ in July of 2016, continued with the recruitment of /pol/ and Reddit's r/politics and r/The_Donald for meme warfare during the Republican primary (i.e. the rise of Pepe), exploded with the help of Wikileaks via the Podesta and DNC emails, the dropping of the pedo food codes on /pol/, the release of the pedo logos by the FBI Record Vault, and the creation of r/Pizzagate, was explicitly helped by Steve Pieszcenik on YouTube, and the Twittergate pedo scandal, and then got a rocket boost from the brutal, cross-platform censorship and "debunking" campaign that silenced Julian Assange, booted r/Pizzagate off of Reddit, shut down Sli.mg, Ben Swann, thousands of Twitter accounts, DDoSed Voat, and finally went into full force with the arrival of QAnon, who has confirmed many of the discoveries we made investigating pizzagate.

kestrel9 ago

A lot of planning for Qteam no doubt. Using the controlled opposition too, imo, (Corsi/Alex Jones/Steve Pieszcenik/George Webb).

lopus ago

Exactly. That's what I thought. Pizzagate and Qanon matched perfectly. I was not around, when Pepe started, but I was already researching about elite pedos since 2014. So I was very early into Pizzagate. Q just seemed to continue where pizzagate was "stopped" (by censorship and MSM)....

....coincidences..?

Onetime1 ago

Vindicator, that is an excellent analysis and summary.

I would add that multiple channels have been employed by the Q team in broader efforts to get information out. Sites such as CDAN and Victory Of The Light contain WAY more information than individuals alone would be able to posses.

On a contrary type of view, the people/sites/institutions that put forth the most efforts to demean researchers (noticeable as well as subtle) would be revealing which 'side' they are truly on. This is an invaluable intelligence point when waging a multifaceted, obfuscatory information war.

Thanks, big-time, for your ongoing efforts.

Vindicator ago

It is my great privelege to serve, Onetime1. :-)