that time when you regret not having visited the chans enough to get what might be a really insightful comment, and even Urban Dictionary won't give you a clue
lol in this case it was a compliment. The way you put it together changed my assessment of george webb. Seems plausible to me that he is a honeypot to catch leakers. he seems to know everything about everyone like it was his job - like he said he was old mossad.
on the other hand, he was allowed to post videos unmolested for 6 months
still no eric braverman
no neil brown
no marc turi
...
whispers seth rich
MOSSAD HONEYPOT COVERUP!!
Maybe it's a masterful example of the insiders controlling the narrative. If so, he sure earned his paycheck. But I fact checked him and he was and is putting forth true information. But there is deception in there.
The most obvious example is him deleting the first 52 of his videos. On day 53, he said that "all of his videos were gone" as if someone else deleted them. But he later admitted to deleting them because one of his sources, avi braverman?, told him to DELET.
Even if he was not what he seemed, what was the purpose of his videos? Catching leakers seems like a more plausible purpose than to help cover up pizzagate - because he did cover it, and other "brownstone" projects pretty extensively in a couple videos. He also was pretty anti clinton. And not necessarily pro trump. What else could he be doing?
view the rest of the comments →
lawfag123 ago
almonds:activated
V____Z ago
that time when you regret not having visited the chans enough to get what might be a really insightful comment, and even Urban Dictionary won't give you a clue
(and by "you" i meant me)
lawfag123 ago
lol in this case it was a compliment. The way you put it together changed my assessment of george webb. Seems plausible to me that he is a honeypot to catch leakers. he seems to know everything about everyone like it was his job - like he said he was old mossad.
on the other hand, he was allowed to post videos unmolested for 6 months
Maybe it's a masterful example of the insiders controlling the narrative. If so, he sure earned his paycheck. But I fact checked him and he was and is putting forth true information. But there is deception in there.
The most obvious example is him deleting the first 52 of his videos. On day 53, he said that "all of his videos were gone" as if someone else deleted them. But he later admitted to deleting them because one of his sources, avi braverman?, told him to DELET.
Even if he was not what he seemed, what was the purpose of his videos? Catching leakers seems like a more plausible purpose than to help cover up pizzagate - because he did cover it, and other "brownstone" projects pretty extensively in a couple videos. He also was pretty anti clinton. And not necessarily pro trump. What else could he be doing?
YingYangMom ago
Distracting us from PG. That's when he started, isn't it? When PG broke. Common sense.
privatepizza ago
Someone mentioned that his first video aired the same day (or week) that Pizzagate broke.
lawfag123 ago
it was low key with no interest though. not a strong indicator in my mind