Unanswered questions: Snopes, wikipedia, coporate media claim pizzagate is debunked. Since these claims persist, can anyone show how the "debunkers" addressed any key questions that we have raised? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by reasonedandinformed

This post is being made to expose that, four months after this story first exploded, all we have seen from corporate/social media and law enforcement is an effort to censor, block,and/or ridicule our investigation. Here is a summary of some of our key findings that have not been touched at all by the MSM or law enforcement. Please click on any and all links below to see how neither major corporate media authorities nor law enforcement have actually addressed any of the legitimate concerns raised by pizzagate:

This is just a short list of the many questions that no one in the media has even asked...let alone answered. The echo chamber simply dismissed it as a hoax/false news without any investigative effort, yet they arrogantly attack us for making unsubstantiated claims. Also, ask yourself this: If this is not legitimate, why would the media/TPTB expend so much energy, including paying for CTR shills on this and other forums, trying to prove this is false without any attempt to actually investigate? The answer: Propaganda is inversely proportional to the truth!

Note: I did not even mention the "pizza code" that started the investigation as the code was a helpful pointer rather than the nexus of proof, with the real evidence found once we started digging.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

huhWHAThuh ago

Their definition of debunked is saying no it isn't.

reasonedandinformed ago

That is the working definition used by CTR, such as @PizzaGateIsRetarded, who has been active in this thread. He will selectively try to pick apart individual pieces within the fabric of the evidence, often with glaring oversights or sleight-of-hand, and he will then use it as a tool to discredit the whole effort. Basically, it works like this for them. You have 10 facts or implications. They pick two that they consider the "weakest" (more hypothetical). They claim to refute...but an analysis shows that they themselves are making assumptions in their own claim. It is often on something that is not provable one way or the other. They will deliberately avoid the information that is too hard to disprove or argue. After falsely claiming to have disproven these two items, they then claim the whole thing is debunked. If police departments operated this way, we would never see an arrest. The facts and implications need to form a theory, pursued by investigation to build the case or retire the lead. If the theory is on target, the investigation uncovers more damaging facts (sometimes irrefutable), often needing a subpoena or surveillance to capture the best data. Only then do you have the kind of proof needed to go to trial and convict. The lying debunkers want to stop ANY investigation. They are insiders and know the truth. This is why they are fighting this so hard, and this is why they constantly push the lie that there is nothing here to investigate, move on you obsessed tin-foil hats. The mission of CTR is to dissuade, discourage, and discredit to stop the effort to investigate and cause those not informed to not look. They will supplement this with deliberately-planted lies to misdirect, waste resources, paint us as haters/racists, and/or to be able to point to this bad information as proof that it is debunked. They also use their efforts to help control the results people see when searching and to scrape the front page of results of damaging leads and theories.

huhWHAThuh ago

Yes. zone in on clear facts No investigation starts with all the details clearly established. That's the point of investigation. Their aim is to dissemble and create confusion, and raise issues that need further investigation. Stay clear, move forward, and don't take the bait. They are practiced at their craft.