I’ll just drop this right here. You guys can come to your own conclusions.
@FastJack posted the conversation he had with Putt. I’m glad because he comes out looking like an asshole and Putt proves that he’s trying to give them a chance to clean up their sub.
For those who have not seen, I made this post trying to get Q’s attention, and reached out to the QRV mods. I explained in the post what’s been going on.
DON’T FORGET TO UPVOTE GOOD COMMENTS AND POSTS & DOWNVOTE ALL SHILLS!
Personally, I think they want it to fail so that they can blame Voat. You know what’s going to come next right? Shills are gonna say Q is comped. 🙄 USE YOUR UPVOTES AND DOWNVOTES. Starve the shills!
If Q were a LARP, would all this be happening? Would we have all these shill attempts? Would Q subs be under attack worse than ever before?
PANIC IN DC! 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
view the rest of the comments →
DanijelStark ago
First thing first ... anonymous subverse is like another level of freedom for all the trolls , shills or any cancer that wants to latch onto ... the anonimity doesnt serve to protect anyone ( and why should it protect anyone on VOAT ? ) or to make opinions objective ... but the anonimity serves a function of giving a breathing space and fertile ground for anyone who wants to hide into .
Thats a crucial mistake #1 of whole QRV subverse . Thats why I had very little contribution there and ultimately completely blocked the whole subverse , as it has become a pointless place .
Again - if there would be OFFICIALLY ENDORSED Q VOAT subverse , it MUST NOT be anonymized .
Qureaucrat ago
anon is needed.
DanijelStark ago
Why would it be needed ? I have put my reasons above why it absolutely shouldnt be ...
Qureaucrat ago
yes i can understand your viewpoint and agree to a degree. As i say above, im split on the issue. Allow me to share this perspective. Lets say your walking down the sidewalk in soapbox park. you stop in to listen to a few soapboxers, and you listen to commentary. You dont know a soul, everyone is effectively anon. The one big difference that i hold against QRV is that i cannot track who says what in the commentary. Ina public square i would at least be able to identify a particular speaker by voice or face, and if the individual spouts off a bunch of non-sense then if that person speaks again I can adjust my bullshit filters accordingly.