You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DanijelStark ago

First thing first ... anonymous subverse is like another level of freedom for all the trolls , shills or any cancer that wants to latch onto ... the anonimity doesnt serve to protect anyone ( and why should it protect anyone on VOAT ? ) or to make opinions objective ... but the anonimity serves a function of giving a breathing space and fertile ground for anyone who wants to hide into .

Thats a crucial mistake #1 of whole QRV subverse . Thats why I had very little contribution there and ultimately completely blocked the whole subverse , as it has become a pointless place .

Again - if there would be OFFICIALLY ENDORSED Q VOAT subverse , it MUST NOT be anonymized .

Qureaucrat ago

anon is needed.

DammitMan ago

Why? Anon has produced nothing good and has made it impossible to keep the sub on topic.

Qureaucrat ago

ill concede that im split on the issue. first thought that comes to mind is so that individuals that have actual unpopular knowledge can share that information without losing their voice.

DammitMan ago

But in the free for all that’s become of QRV people have already losing their voice b

Qureaucrat ago

sure if your paying attention to the daily board, if you follow the Hot topics, you bypass the thickest of the shit. For anon to work properly each anon must exercise their vote its those votes that help sort out the trash from the true gems of information that come down the line.

Qureaucrat ago

yes it is. like i said im split on the issue.

DanijelStark ago

Why would it be needed ? I have put my reasons above why it absolutely shouldnt be ...

Qureaucrat ago

yes i can understand your viewpoint and agree to a degree. As i say above, im split on the issue. Allow me to share this perspective. Lets say your walking down the sidewalk in soapbox park. you stop in to listen to a few soapboxers, and you listen to commentary. You dont know a soul, everyone is effectively anon. The one big difference that i hold against QRV is that i cannot track who says what in the commentary. Ina public square i would at least be able to identify a particular speaker by voice or face, and if the individual spouts off a bunch of non-sense then if that person speaks again I can adjust my bullshit filters accordingly.