You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

srayzie ago

Was the image link “Our Potus on Fire” here before the post was deleted? If so, I think in the future, a post like this should not be deleted. The link is showing others that Trump was going to be on 60 minutes. However, it would be better if more than an image link was provided. I think it’s still acceptable tho.

@MolochHunter

@ArtistiqueJewelry - The mod may not have known that an image link showing that Trump would be acceptable. He has no reason to want that censored.

Since when have I ever censored you? OWI got banned after several warnings when he attacked you. I have always been fair with you when attacked. So I think it’s rude to act as tho this subverse censors “more than Facebook.”

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

@MolechHunter srayzie, I was saying that Immediately when I got banned.

I see others speak their minds, generally in a disrespectful manner, yet they get by with it. I stand up for myself and. . .

I was making it Clear that facebook allowed this to run when I posted it last night because they didn't remove it; therefore, it was Fact that it was deleted here, but not there.

I can't change fact. I have always called a spade a spade and yes. . .this makes many hate me! Used to it, but I don't like muddied facts. I want it straight no matter how putrid!

Quite used to the pig lot and putrid. . .Still Preferred to the Fake Facade and expected ego stroking or ignoring the Facts in order to "fit in!"

No thanks!

This poses a problem for those who want and Do straddle the fence! Rules should Not be Posted, nor a pretense of adhering to them. . .if there won't be an effort to follow through.

Thus Obama's "fake line in the sand." Thus the tampering and efforts to Destroy our Constitution. . That's anarchy. . .exactly what controllers want!

If there isn't to be a Standard of law or rules. . .they shouldn't be posted!

All should have to abide by the Same Said rules or the bias is Glaring!

We've all stayed silent too long while taking abuse! We don't like it when we see the same methods still being employed.

Yes, I thought it was unfair Because others on this board, prior to reddit joiners, wasn't saying you, have falsely accused me, called me vile names and viciously attacked, been verbally abusive when I have Never called names or attacked Anyone. Never prompted, never trolled, even succumbed to giving them upvotes as practically mandated Only for me, not for them. I have engaged and been kind to the haters. Never reciprocated and from what I could see, was not demanded of them as it Was for me! I don't think it should be demanded on either side BTW, just pointing out the blatant dichotomy.

I was always told in so many words, "that was just how it was," after people attacked then tattled on me when they couldn't bully me to do their bidding.

Also told I better buck up and be willing to take the abuse in so many words, that it was like a type of boot camp and that's just how it was. Breaking people in.

Okay.

I get that. . .the unfairness comes in where they can break the rules set forth stating that posters weren't allowed to attack others. . but I Wasn't allowed to Say a word about it or stand up for myself without being given stipulations when I was the One Attacked. . .not them!

Stipulations of being forced to engage on other posts, even though people didn't have to (nor should they be forced) on my posts. Very totalitarian as many times I get zero responses to comments and that is fine (I don't want people forced).
Not sure why I was being singled out and Forced in order to submit research, when this was a board claiming to be about Q and Q encouraged people to go deeper. . .seek out info as we have More than we Know. Odd, or is it?

OWI attacked numerous times and had a posse after me. They even called you out at the end. Yes, you stood up then and weren't bullied when he began attacking you in the same manner. I realize you also stood up for me when he once again as the attacker tattled on my and tried to get me to submit!

I knew that wasn't anyone's direct fault on here. He wasn't removed until he attacked the mod.

Mods are busy, so probably had no idea how much havoc he reeked. Understandable as I Only pointed it out After he, as the attacker tattled and expected me to be punished for His actions. I thought that was what we were all fighting against as Patriots.

No this mod who deleted wasn't part of the posse as I initially thought. . .I was given false info concerning the name ( he was named, but acknowledged these were low level character people) and I acknowledged that.

Took responsibility for it, though many in charge have Never taken responsibility for errors and misjudgements. Not saying this particular mod. The mod stated it needed a link. I was happy to comply.

I simply noted initially that there were Others allowed to post what I would consider Opinion posts. . .I had no issue with them myself, once again, **Facts are simply facts.
Pointing out a discrepancy as to me it was plain and simple.

He came back and explained, I fully understand the position he is in.

There seems to be an issue of the attacked and messenger always being despised or called a whiner if they stick up for themselves. Not saying directly from you, but has been allowed by the abusers. Just another tactic to silence.

Quick to jump. . .yes. . .because of the constant double standard and abuse on here. Not saying from mods. . .posters allowed because the mod didn't want to censor them no matter how verbally abusive and how many unwarranted, non instigated attacks they threw my way. I was told over and over my attackers had good hearts, but all of a sudden, once they attacked the mod. ..the story finally changed and they were suspended.

Once again. . .only commented on them after said attackers tattled on me.

There may have been One time where I finally said something about E_C's attacks prior to his tattling for not caving in to his demands.

As for this. . .I also feel that no matter how hard I work or jump through mandates. . .I Have been expected to deal with a lot of abuse, not from everyone, I pinpointed the trolls from shareblue early, but I am always like John crying in the wilderness. People don't listen Until it happens to them. Understandable that this is human nature.

I will say, that although giving ultimatums, srayzie did stick up for me at times. Bear in mind. . .I had done Nothing to warrant the False Attacks, verbal abuse and vicious name calling. Never called names back nor verbally abused the attackers prior nor after.

She stuck up for me right before IWO started attacking her in only Some of the ways he and his posse attacked me. They even went over to reddit right before it was taken down and did the same.

Generally don’t talk about it, because I realize people are busy, too much to do, but if I am called out. . .will state it like it is.

I realize I am Not the only one who deals with this.

I do feel if I stick up for myself I am called out, even though others stick up for themselves While being abusive!

I am Far from abusive. Since I felt I got it wrong about the mod. . .I apologized. I keep my statements respectful.

I have Never treated anyone in the manner I have been subjected to or expected to tolerate. Yes, life's not fair, but Others have been given a license to abuse many times.

No one has EVER apologized to me . I also know that is the right of the mod to pick and choose who follows the rules. Not saying MH was doing this as he is just following orders and I do support and believe rules should be followed. ..by all.

I was told even though I was not the attacker nor initial tattler. . .the attackers were tattling, which caused the mod to place ultimatums on me. . .engage more with others (though others don't always respond to me, they are Not forced to engage with me nor do I think they should be) or was told I shouldn't post and I am limited if wanting to post my own research. Which is fine as new rules were made to appease the attackers.

When I stuck up for myself prior to the incident where IWO was abusive with me, then later with a mod. . .I was told perhaps this wasn't the site for me (that was prior to abuse with mod).

Now, I don't know what was said in private to IOW, but I do know that he had free reign Until attacking a mod in the same manner he had been doing to me for months.

That was only One. There are others who are still allowed free reign. They know Q group is watching now since the Reddit board moved over here, so people are conducting themselves in a different manner I noticed.

I do grow weary of the double standards. Fine if people are allowed free reign, then mandates should not be placed on the attacked. The attacked didn’t instigate the problem! Preposterous and that is my opinion I realize.

This is actually moot now, as I understood the mod's position on this particular post and the fact the mod is striving to do what is expected.

Once again. . .I also apologized.

Is there any other issue? And yes, the image was there, so perhaps the mod just wasn't clear on the expectation.

Image was there and same info as in deleted post except for the addition of two links.

I understand wanting deeper research. I do that all the time, yet I am attacked for doing so Much of the time. Not on other platforms as much, just here (not saying by you directly).

Once again, simple fact.

They called off the censors on me on FB, so my statement concerning Zuck was apt. For now. . .more has gotten through there than I am allowed to put through on here.

As you said before when I've stuck up for myself against attacks and verbal abuse. . .I am free to go elsewhere.

I believe my response was, "I never said I was going anywhere!"

I had also apologized if I had caused the mods any trouble.

No one has ever apologized for being wrong about the abusers and allowing them free reign.

I would have said nothing, but if I am called out. . .Tired of sitting by quietly and just Taking it. It's what many of us have done for years.

Not just Sheep No More, but also Silent No More! If this causing me to be Blacklisted, posts flagged, me hated more. . .So be it!

I've been there before, nothing new under the sun!

Rather have Truth, the whole truth than fake or tampering with the rules to suit the buddy system!

A spade can't be a heart. . .people will twist, fence straddle, appease and attempt to shape into a heart. ..Still a Spade!

Crensch ago

I see others speak their minds, generally in a disrespectful manner, yet they get by with it. I stand up for myself and. . .

And, generally speaking, the mods of PG and GA are some of the most attacked users on this website. You can be yourself, but you'll have to learn to navigate better if you don't want some retaliatory remarks to your words.

No One has saved me. He was gotten rid of because he attacked you. Fair enough. . .

Having been around for this, him attacking you WAS the last straw for @srayzie, and him attacking srayzie was just another Tuesday for her.

Yes, I thought it was unfair Because others on this board, prior to reddit joiners, wasn't saying you, have falsely accused me, called me vile names and viciously attacked, been verbally abusive when I have Never called names or attacked Anyone.

You don't get brownie points for being nice here.

And your word there, "others" makes any argument of fairness look retarded. There's nothing fair about Voat

Never prompted, never trolled, even succumbed to giving them upvotes as practically mandated Only for me, not for them.

What is this? Mandated by whom?

I have engaged and been kind to the haters.

Why? Why would you do that?

Never reciprocated and from what I could see, was not demanded of them as it Was for me!

Source for this?

I was always told in so many words, "that was just how it was," after people attacked then tattled on me when they couldn't bully me to do their bidding.

1) That's exactly how Voat is.

2) What? Do you ever source your claims?

Also told I better buck up and be willing to take the abuse in so many words, that it was like a type of boot camp and that's just how it was. Breaking people in.

Voat doesn't care about you or your feelings. Voat cares about who has the best support for their position.

I get that. . .the unfairness comes in where they can break the rules set forth stating that posters weren't allowed to attack others. . but I Wasn't allowed to Say a word about it or stand up for myself without being given stipulations when I was the One Attacked. . .not them!

Do you understand that the comment before yours was roughly 6 lines of text, while the above-quoted is probably some 30 lines down of your comment? And that might be OK if you provided relevant context for your words but right now it seems like you're on some kind of ramble.

@srayzie once told me that she loves your work.

I didn't really look, but if your work is anything like these comments, it's nonsensical and absurd; zero context provided, just a stream-of-consciousness response that doesn't seem to show even the slightest concern for anyone trying to understand your words. I'm almost certain I would have to read your mind to understand what you're writing here.

In fact, every single response of yours in this nest shows ZERO quoted text to which you're specifically responding. Are you just a soapbox hero? Here to make no-context statements that cause readers to go cross-eyed before getting through even a quarter of your comments? Is all of this designed to look like legalese?

Did you know that vague claims like "they attacked me" on a forum mean exactly nothing without context? People read (or try to read) what you write. Are you writing so they understand you, or are you writing because you love seeing your thoughts show up in text?

So many questions, and so incredibly much wrong with what you're writing here - and I can't bring myself to read through all of your comments in order to address your actual points more than I already have.

Bottom line:

Formatting matters. So does context. Try a little harder to communicate your thoughts clearly, or nobody will read enough of your words to care about you.

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

You state,

You can thank @srayzie for me using the kid gloves here. Whatever you see of my words that you think is rude or mean, just know this is me being nice; not a single person on this website will care if it hurts your feelings.

Has she requested you “have a talk with me?” Though I already gave her her props, told her all the positive and apologized Immediately to MH?

Regular patriots would have seen this as moot since I apologized to MolechHunter for jumping the gun and believing one of the share blue trolls, allowed free reign for a year (that’s only under one name. . .they all have Many).

For Context and Verification please refer to this link https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2789691

Under a reply to srayzie

Also see my apology under MolechHunter’s response addressed Ms Artistique.

If anyone should have been triggered or had a right. . .it was him.

MH did the right thing, accepted deserved apology and took the high road. On to following The Plan.

I respect that immensely!

Needed for unity. Not ganging up on because someone pointed out Rules were Not followed due to the Buddy System, and no responsibility is taken so attacks ensue on the messenger.

After srayzie pinged others in the mod group. . .I also pinged them because I am used to hearing Both sides of a story.

srayzie explained it was not the buddy system she was only pinging them because they were mods and needed to be aware. Yet, here you are.

I took her at her word. Even gave her all her props for her hard work and what she likely puts up with; therefore, not sure what this is about or why you feel compelled to ”be brought in,” whether of your own accord or her confiding in you, or asking you. Her freedom and right btw, so don’t try to turn this into another distraction please. It is fine to have friends and support.

I then received one triggered response and a regular response simply asking why I pinged.

I don't need kid gloves, as of course I noticed she referred to my questioning and responses as a tantrum, though I never call names or belittle.

So the pretense that there is No Ganging up seems false. Just stating what I see.

People don’t like it that I attend to the facts because then I’m not reacting to their attempt of inciting responses fueled by anger.

So for context. . .are you a mod on here? Not being sarcastic, genuinely asking because otherwise. . .what was the reason for her to tell you to use "kid gloves" if you didn't decide to address me on your own?

You already admitted you don't read my material. . . so clearly you have been brought in, even though this was already addressed.

You state,

Having been around for this, him attacking you WAS the last straw for @srayzie, and him attacking srayzie was just another Tuesday for her.

I didn’t ask to be attacked by one of the unhinged share blue posers allowed free reign.

I didn’t allow him to run rampant for a year.

I wasn’t the one allowing him to also attack srayzie. She was the one who chose to allow him to continue breaking the rules, “he had a good heart.”

Bottom line. . . this is an ego situation where the Facts cannot be denied, and I am being put on a Mod vote trial for daring to point it out.

Anyone with logic and common sense can see What is going on here.

The facts are there and clear. . .he was breaking rules even by her own admission and you, of the abuse.

It stated right in the rules something to the effect of

Posts/Comments that are just insults, name calling and off topic are not welcome. It’s ok to disagree but be respectful of one another. 

You state,

And, generally speaking, the mods of PG and GA are some of the most attacked users on this website. You can be yourself, but you'll have to learn to navigate better if you don't want some retaliatory remarks to your words.

I wasn’t the one who called him out . . .he wasn’t the Only one.

I was fine taking care of myself against the attacks. There were countless attack and evidence of a posse who put together including mods that were pointed to who had also attacked.

He drew her in and even You in at one point.

Need verification? Archived post here,

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2596650

Crensch response image Here

You input a prior statement I made,

No One has saved me. He was gotten rid of because he attacked you. Fair enough. . .

That Is a Fact!

Just look at the timeline! By your own admission and hers, he was attacking was it “every Tuesday?” Don’t even try it. Yes, I know that was for effect.

Even some on reddit, I’m small time so not saying a lot, but people who are Genuine Patriots saw he and others go over there and try their ploys there.

It has been verified the vicious attacks and even srayzie didn’t like it or she wouldn’t have made these posts.

So don’t try to pretend I can’t hold my own or requested help. Wasn’t requested.

Already let srayzie know I appreciated it and if I had a p.o. box, does’t matter if we disagree, I would send her a gift. Not One bit sarcastic.

Fact remains. ..she ditched him when he started calling her the C names and attacking her. Not My Fault this unhinged person ran rampant like a demon.

Evidence there were compromises from account posters, other tells, and still are. . .TheAwakening.

This is a simple case of someone not wanting to admit they were wrong about someone’s character clearly demonstrated beyond a doubt until. . .

then being furious when pointing out They chose to befriend said attacker and disregard their own rules.

You state,

Did you know that vague claims like "they attacked me" on a forum mean exactly nothing without context? People read (or try to read) what you write.

Are you writing so they understand you, or are you writing because you love seeing your thoughts show up in text?

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2707165

Really? Are you writing to see your own words or maybe stroke your own ego?

Thanks for the levity! You using mean girls' tactics whisks us all back to high school.

For those of us who didn't just come out of high school. ..they don't work on us. But valiant effort.

Yes it's Voat and you own the boards, Your virtue signaling reeks of progressive behavior that Patriots are fighting against!

Looks like he attacked you also? Don't worry, I'll put your link in for you.

srayzie done with OWIHere

Here's where he got his posse after me and looks like you had issues with him too and commented under my post here,

https://voat.co/v/whatever/2700949/13701840

Appears you had other run ins or info about his activities here

https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2596821

Why Was he Allowed Free Reign for So long when blatantly breaking the rules, wreaking havoc and causing disruptions?

Clear Cabal tactics. Why did it take so long? I believe That is a valid question as he wasn't furthering the cause nor unity.

Shooting the messenger or trying to rearrange the facts to cover ones hide. . .does not work with people dedicated to Truth.

Facts cannot be twisted. Yes, you can all try. . .evidence is there.

Mistakes happen. Trying to get me to take the blame for someone else’s mistake or at least their decision to not comply with their own set forth rules does not make them a bad person.

Should ust own up to it rather than doing this ganging up bit.

Once again, I gave srayzie All her dues, so not sure what more you are wanting from me? .

Not going to lie to appease the mods!

Another phrase you pulled out.

Never reciprocated and from what I could see, was not demanded of them as it Was for me!

Then asked for Source,

I have an email where I was specifically told to interact more, even though I do and many times people Don’t interact with me,

That was a stipulation because the share blue trolls attempted to distract and level false claims. Worked because I was the one given a stipulation that isn’t even in the rules. Yet they were allowed to break the rules for at least a year.

Was also told concerning yet another media matters poser after he Attacked me, not other way around. . .when I defended myself was told I could go elsewhere.

I’m a big girl, I Never Said I was going anywhere, not ran off so easily just because one has made friends with posers known to pull the wool over people’s eyes.

Now if I put that email up. . .I will be ridiculed for revealing info considered confidential where things were said about others.

Not taking the bait!

For your other accusations or if you want to call them your personal observations, . . .

Clear mod bias.

Using the same rules of the elitists where the mods may have Their Say but if the subordinates, posters. . .

dare speak truth and it doesn’t coincide with the picture mods are trying to paint, we will be ganged up on, belittled and attempts made to force submission.

You may say that’s just Voat. Okay then, don’t be triggered when we call out the blatant Buddy System and media matters personnel too easily being allowed free reign.

Thus is needed. . .TheAwakening

If I am banned, when All of you were allowed to speak your mind. . .Proves my Point.

I handled all of you with kid gloves.. I have given srayzie and the mods their due props and taken responsibility.

Mods don't Have to take responsibility for actions. . .Their board, but don't expect us to take the blame for Your actions or lack thereof,

then pretend. . .it is something other than what it is!

I have provided

  • more evidence

  • some of Your Own evidence

Need any more Context?

Crensch ago

Has she requested you “have a talk with me?”

Not at all. You were one of the users she liked, and she banned OWI over his treatment of you.

Though I already gave her her props, told her all the positive and apologized Immediately to MH?

I don't give a shit about any of that.

Regular patriots

I'm a goat. I'm not one of you. I'm a patriot in my own way, and when you try to shame me by telling me what your NPC-patriots do, I'll be sure to get just a little meaner.

would have seen this as moot since I apologized to MolechHunter for jumping the gun and believing one of the share blue trolls, allowed free reign for a year (that’s only under one name. . .they all have Many).

I don't care about what happened between you and @MolochHunter.

For Context and Verification please refer to this link https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2789691

Linking me to your submission that we're already in isn't useful, and only showed you writing this:

I will probably be blacklisted and targeted now as I was last time when I spoke up against attacks and attempts to censorship because I pointed out several other articles that are Opinion, but allowed to stay because of the Buddy system only enjoyed by the privileged.

... like a whiny little bitch, and with zero context.

Under a reply to srayzie

I'm supposed to look for this reply now? Nah. You can link directly to it, or you can keep being a cunt about things; I don't dig around because you hand-waved me to an entire post and tell me to find the relevant parts.

Also see my apology under MolechHunter’s response addressed Ms Artistique.

I don't care about your apology.

If anyone should have been triggered or had a right. . .it was him.

Nobody cares.

MH did the right thing, accepted deserved apology and took the high road. On to following The Plan.

Good for you. I don't really care about taking the high road, so you'd better be in this for the long haul.

I respect that immensely!

Nobody cares what you think.

Needed for unity. Not ganging up on because someone pointed out Rules were Not followed due to the Buddy System, and no responsibility is taken so attacks ensue on the messenger.

No context. I might care, but without context, I definitely don't; neither does anyone else. Try again.

After srayzie pinged others in the mod group. . .I also pinged them because I am used to hearing Both sides of a story.

Who cares about this? Are you going to tell me your entire life's story? Are you going to narrate to me your internal play-by-play instead of presenting the relevant information without a bunch of bullshit nobody cares about?

srayzie explained it was not the buddy system she was only pinging them because they were mods and needed to be aware. Yet, here you are.

Yes. Here I am. What's your problem with me responding to you? It's not like I just downvoted you and didn't say a word. Do you not like it when your public opinions are made known to others that might not have otherwise seen them? Are you trying to hide something?

I took her at her word.

As well you should. She's a fucking saint, and always thinks people are generally good and nice and want to help. It's too bad she was wrong about you.

Even gave her all her props for her hard work and what she likely puts up with; therefore, not sure what this is about or why you feel compelled to ”be brought in,” whether of your own accord or her confiding in you, or asking you.

I comment where I choose to comment. Sounds like you have an issue with your words being scrutinized. I really do think you're hiding something in your bullshit walls of context-free text.

Her freedom and right btw, so don’t try to turn this into another distraction please. It is fine to have friends and support.

I comment when I want to comment. She's one of the most attacked users on this website, if not the most attacked user on this website, and she went out of her way to make this place inviting for you. I saw that, and I saw your words, and I could only think, "oh shit, this is another one that @srayzie is going to trust that will blow up in her face", so I kept an eye on you.

I don't know if you PMd it to her, but never once did you thank her for finally dealing with OWI; in fact, you thank her with accusations of favouritism, or whateverthefuck it is you've been railing about here without context for 15,000 words in 3 comments. You're an ungrateful cunt that didn't deserve to be treated so nicely by someone so much better than you.

I then received one triggered response and a regular response simply asking why I pinged.

You seem to fancy yourself a writer. Do you know what an antecedent is, you illiterate cunt?

I ask this because you ignore context like a child that just learned how to use pronouns.

I don't need kid gloves, as of course I noticed she referred to my questioning and responses as a tantrum, though I never call names or belittle.

Oh, you're not getting them anymore. Don't regret your words.

And what the fuck would I know or care about her calling your words a tantrum? Kid gloves are for snowflake/SJW/soyboy faggots that can't handle harsh words without pissing themselves. You're clearly an adult, and you're just as clearly low-IQ, and have nothing at all interesting to say.

So the pretense that there is No Ganging up seems false. Just stating what I see.

So you can't handle defending your words, because someone calling you out on your bullshit is "ganging up" on you. Got it.

People don’t like it that I attend to the facts because then I’m not reacting to their attempt of inciting responses fueled by anger.

You seem incapable of presenting facts, much less context to your words. What do I care what other people don't like? It certainly has nothing to do with me or what's going on here.

Fueled by anger? There may be anger here, but it's coming from the fronthole that can't express herself despite writing novel-tier comments with zero context.

So for context. . .are you a mod on here?

I'm supposed to provide context, but you never have to? Kek.

Let's play a little game where you look at the sidebar on the right, and you scroll up or down until you see the mod list, then you understand why I am once again calling you a stupid cunt.

Not being sarcastic,

I don't care.

genuinely asking because otherwise. . .what was the reason for her to tell you to use "kid gloves" if you didn't decide to address me on your own?

I didn't say she told me to use kid gloves, I said you can thank her for me doing so. Do writers normally find themselves lying about what other people have written?

I've said before, srayzie is a fucking saint. She deals with users in her sub with a very light touch compared to almost literally everywhere else on this website. I don't want to be someone scaring away good users (again, what she once thought you were) on her subverse; it'd be terribly rude of me.

I always decide when I want to comment. I saw an ungrateful cunt, so I responded.

You already admitted you don't read my material. . . so clearly you have been brought in, even though this was already addressed.

I only need one comment, but nice try; it's amazing what I can glean from so very little, and I'm usually right. You wouldn't know anything about that, so you'll just think I'm bluffing.

I didn’t ask to be attacked by one of the unhinged share blue posers allowed free reign.

More of your context-less bullshit. I'll ASSUME you're talking about OWI right now, but nobody owes you protection here. Nobody.

I didn’t allow him to run rampant for a year.

You also didn't put together a compelling case to have him removed. Just whine to the mods and make them do all your work for you? You really are a helpless little bitch, aren't you?

I wasn’t the one allowing him to also attack srayzie. She was the one who chose to allow him to continue breaking the rules, “he had a good heart.”

Sounds like you're bitter.

She has sole discretion for what happens here, and her trying to keep it as Voat-like as possible is admirable; she built this subverse herself and went through more than a weak cunt like you could ever imagine to make it work. I know, because I put her through some of that hell.

Nobody gets a free pass from me, and I'm not the only one that doesn't give a pussy pass to frontholes and soyboys.

Bottom line. . . this is an ego situation where the Facts cannot be denied, and I am being put on a Mod vote trial for daring to point it out.

You're getting your words responded to, for once in your miserable, illiterate life, and you hate it. I'm not a mod on GA, so your claim of this is complete horseshit - either the product of a dishonest, or lazy cunt.

Anyone with logic and common sense can see What is going on here.

Yes. You suck at writing.

The facts are there and clear. . .he was breaking rules even by her own admission and you, of the abuse.

And me, what? Look at that sentence above. LOOK AT THAT SENTENCE ABOVE. Do you even know what ellipsis is, or how to use it? Does that sentence make any sense with the inclusion of me and abuse? Pull that sentence apart and what do you have? One of TWO possibilities:

1) you, of the abuse.

2) he was breaking rules -> and you, of the abuse.

What the fuck do either of those mean? ENGLISH, CUNT - DO YOU WRITE IT?

@shizy @Vindicator @think-

srayzie ago

Thank you @Crensch!

I am just amazed at how she’s acting. I have always been extra nice to her. I could tell she was sensitive and I respected that she was a Christian lady. She wrote me crying. @Kevdude has told me that I can’t fall for that shit. I try to gear towards newbies. I want them to feel welcome. I remember how freaked out and shocked I was when I joined Voat. I didn’t even do social media. I would get my feelings hurt and cry. So, I have compassion when I see someone struggling, when I believe they are truly here for the right reason.

I used to think I was a good judge of character. But I’m learning so many lessons. From Jerome Corsi and Alex Jones, to regular users. I almost put some names down but don’t want more drama. Anyways, I’m sick of people that see themselves as victims and expect me to have fixed it all for them. She has twisted everything because she got butt hurt. Her accusing me of banning OWI because he attacked me is so off base. I’ve fought with him several times. I deal with assholes on a daily basis. I’m not banning them. All the way up until I banned him, I was defending her. I never expected she would be a judgmental vindictive petty drama queen like this.

Every step of the way, it’s times like this that I learn a lesson that makes me stronger or makes me choose a different approach next time. Dealing with the 3 people I’ve dealt with in the last 2 days, it makes me want to just say fuck it. I just keep getting shit on by people who have no clue how to run a sub. If I jumped in to save people every time they were “picked on”, GA wouldn’t have made it for a month. Kevdude would try to tell me that I needed to stop banning. I would be frustrated. But now, I see he was right all along. Even tho I myself am attacked a lot more, the board itself is running much smoother because I made those changes.

I was once weak here. If I can toughen up, so can they. @ArtistiqueJewelry has lost all respect in my eyes. She’s on her own. Oh and by the way, she started her own Q sub and didn’t even have the decency to let me know. When the going gets tough, you sure see who the Q dividers are. It’s pathetic.

Thank you again.

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

I've lost All respect not for you, but for your lack of self awareness and the ability to control your emotions.

Selflessness and putting your egos aside was needed for a Q board.

None of the behaviors you nor your mod friends demonstrate is supportive of The Plan, nor does it unify.

What it does do is put Yourselves above others. Your ego's are all people can see.

You are not only incapable of sticking to facts, but are far too susceptible to your own emotions.

This is part of what the luciferian agenda has perpetuated upon you as kids, so I Do feel sorry for you. None of us wished this for you.

Kids your age have a difficult time because of all the negative energy coming from devices, lack of experience and low engagement in the real word dealing with facts and posers like those share blue plants you fell for and thought "were your friends."

You not dealing well with someone pointing out truth demonstrates inability to handle frustration. Another side effect of the environment you've grown up in and inability to process, which leads to poor choices and peer pressure of fitting in with someone like IOW. You need to be decisive and quick when someone breaks the rules. That's how it works, why we want share blues cohorts. . . Hillary and Obama prosecuted.

Volatile speech and tantrums from mods just don't make a good Q board. Very disappointed in this behavior portrayed.

I was kind to you and tried to understand when you were feeling victimized, but attacking someone just because they won't do and say what you want is what the other side is about, not what The Plan is about.

Saying I was crying when I Never talked to you on the phone is dishonest. I believe I have proven in standing up to your gang tactics that I am not a cryer nor a retreater as when you tried to get rid of me when siding with your buddy Ian and his other buddies like EC (who did the tattling, not me).

Lying and never admitting one's mistakes. . .a sign of poor character.

I learned a lesson about you. That is how v/TheAwakening knew who could handle their group with integrity and insight.

Only told you about 1 person. Never knew you would throw such a fit over it as You were Supposed to be the moderator.
Odd because your response was a Far Cry from what you are portraying on here now. You confided he had given you and others a lot of troubles. So not sure what the deal is now.

Technically your job to address issues where someone is Blatantly Breaking Your rules. . .you set forth as no one else had made them.

IWO and all others drug You in. I had given up on you doing anything about the share blue posers after the initial question why rules were not followed.

You chose to defend or use me as a scapegoat for getting rid of Ian (it appears you were trying to save face with some of his buddies), even after you and your buddy Crensch said he caused you problems all the time.

He was disposed of After he called you the name your buddy called me.

You can revel in your victimhood over something you didn't nip in the bud, then continue with your mob mods to slam me for your plight, won't change the facts.

Share blue infiltrators, connected to Media Matters with ties to Soros were allowed to run amuck for at least a year under the cloak of your friendship as your words were, "they have good hearts." That is Exactly how charities, 501c3's present themselves too.

You are young so people understand being fooled. No need to attack others for pointing it out.

There are questions to Validity at this point as You and your "tribe of mods" . are clearly demonstrating the Exact same tactics.

Nice try, they don't work on Patriots.

You attempting to take someone's freedom of speech away, and resorting to these globalist motives when you Don't get Your way is very telling.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt when you said you pinged the others who questioned being pinged to hear my side, when you "claimed" it was because they are mods.

Then you displayed a lack of honesty by bringing in yet another mod buddy from another board.

You should have just been honest. I and other Patriots can respect that a lot more.

THIS is NOT a GAME.

As you mature, you will realize it's best to just own your mistakes, rather than blame Everyone else or someone who you think is below you.

I peg this group at about 26 pretending they are in their 30's. Soros infiltration through a cover.

I see others saw the same thing.

Posers will always expose themselves. Sheep No More.

People who can't control their temper or resort to the base level attacks demonstrated by you and two of your mods, are Exactly why v/theawakening was needed and established.

You should have higher expectations for your actions, if not for the sake of others, for yourselves. You should place the bar higher.

Sad, but not irredeemable.

You may mature with time. That is a good thing. I never view anyone without hope.

MolochHunter ago

Hey. I deleted your post, you objected, I explained, then we made up. Right?

That post wasn't exactly a hill of any great value to die on. So I don't understand why you kept at @Srayzie . Now I guess the damage is done, and too great to overcome

Guess we won't see you around no more

You have something to contribute to the Q movement, but sabotage your self sometimes

take care

ArtistiqueJewelry ago

I apologized right away to you MolochHunter after you explained.

I apologized for Jumping the gun. You were owed an apology as I was used to being targeted while others were allowed to break her own rules. I also listened to him (though not friends at all obviously) when he drew out certain names.

In all attacks and communications from them that came my way. . .I stuck to taking responsibility for my actions. I do not require or expect of others what I don't do myself.

She kept at me BTW. I simply wouldn't back down from the facts. I realize these people are young, and felt that I tried my best to to be understanding while attending to facts. In this world they have grown up in. . .they are programmed to deal with everything on an emotional level, rather than facts and knowledge. They are also programmed to Blame Everyone Else for their Actions. Goes back to personal responsibility and owning ones mistakes.

I didn't realize we were not allowed free speech. I practiced mine without name calling. . .Yes, they have free speech too, but why am I singled out for simply standing up for myself with facts and evidence? Once again, what Q and Patriots are trying to expose. . .the entitled getting their free speech, but we don't get ours!

She sent people after me, not the other way around. 3 to 1 mob style attacks on me. She even lied about that. Claimed she pinged people because they were mods, but later when no one could bait me into behaving like they were, she sent the guy whose name looks like Cern to attempt to bring me down. So she clearly lied because he's not even a mod of her GA board. Clearly all very childish behavior. I realize children will be children, but I am not a coward and don't back down from facts just to appease them.

I don't understand why others were drug in either. Immature and not unifying.

What srayzie did was wrong. She sabotaged herself.

She used the same tactics of denial about the infiltrators TheAwakening group was aware of.

Refusing to take responsibility and blaming me for something she didn't want to acknowledge or nip in the bud, was not my fault.

Her siding with known rule breakers while punishing me was wrong.

If we are to cow down and submit. . .why even attempt to fight against the globalist and their infiltrators?

I gave proof of what was going on as she and her friends continued to using personal attacks, name calling and belittling methods. Part of the script for media matters.

These people demanded proof, when I gave it they became even More unhinged. Good people saw IWO's attacks on me before they removed them due to his ban. I didn't drag her into Any of that, he did when he couldn't get me to submit just as she and her friends are doing now. As stated, I'm not going to lie to appease people. That is Not the Q movement.

I'll stick to being targeted, attacked and hated before I will deal on the level of twisted truth. We are all trying to end that.

That is not the behvavior promoted by Q. Nor is it unifying for someone saying they run a Q board.

I kept quiet about it until she continued to accuse and say things that were not true.

Why was it okay for her to allow people like Ian to break her posted rules, yet force me to cave to his demands? Things don't add up. Me being punished for pointing it out after being attacked is radical.

Once again as when she tried to run me off because the attackers were after me and I didn't tattle, just stood up for myself, she couldn't take their heat so told me I could go elsewhere.

I never said I was going anywhere. Am I banned for free speech or standing up for myself? Is she in charge of All of Voat?

As far as Q, my assignments are not continent on the Voat platform. I do as is needed and help out on many other platforms.
Just as the Q movement and communications continue on the chans and other boards. . .

There are good people here, GA does not make them or break them in the same manner reddit wasn't the end all. It's about the Good people and Genuine Patriots dedicated to honor and We the People.

There are good people here so still not planning on being ran off.

Anyone not programmed can see they are furious because I don't fit the mold, I don't take their bait to be incited, I just deflect the arrows and stick to the facts. This incites them further because they can form no weapon against me.

You take care too. I have no issues with you at all. Should not have lumped you in with the tactics of others. That was wrong on my part.

srayzie ago

I've lost All respect not for you, but for your lack of self awareness and the ability to control your emotions.

Selflessness and putting your egos aside was needed for a Q board.

None of the behaviors you nor your mod friends demonstrate is supportive of The Plan, nor does it unify.

What it does do is put Yourselves above others. Your ego's are all people can see.

You are not only incapable of sticking to facts, but are far too susceptible to your own emotions.

You just literally described yourself. You’re first private message you wrote me, you told me YOU WERE CRYING. You act as if it was my job to police the board to make sure nobody victimized you. When I did come to your defense, you weren’t thankful. You thought I had some ulterior motive. That reflects on you. Not me. You are the type of person that one can’t please. It is not my job to go slap everyone’s hand and put them on time outs because they are “mean”. You’re an adult. Stand up for yourself. Maybe people would have had a little bit more respect. People can’t stand being around whiny little showflakes. You sound like you grew up a spoiled brat. I don’t owe you shit. You’ve had freedom to say whatever you wanted. You’ve been able to post your failing steemit posts. You’ve had free speech this entire time. If you can’t be a big girl and stand up for yourself, that has nothing to do with me. I have kids. I don’t need more. I have helped you out of compassion. Look what that got me. You accuse me of having ulterior motives. Geez lady.

You called me a kid? How old do you think I am? 🙄 I have a family and have done just fine running v/GreatAwakening. You have no idea about the experiences I’ve had in life. Since you got butt hurt and someone came to my defense, now you want to act like the other subs were established because Voat needed a Q board with integrity? Do you know how many people would laugh at that?

Girlfriend, you have no clue what’s going on behind the scenes with your new Q sub. But, I’m glad you found it. You will fit right in there! Why not go try to make your own Q sub grow? You obviously thought we needed yet, ANOTHER Q sub to divide the people. But, if you feel that you would do a lot better job than I do, v/TheAwakening doesn’t work out for you, then go for it. It would be entertaining seeing how you handled users that complain, call you names, troll, post shit not related to Q, and show you no respect. You would lose your fricken mind. Let’s see how long it takes you to break. We all need lessons in life. Maybe you need something drastic to make you see that the world doesn’t revolve around you.

You haven’t earned respect here. You have no credibility. All you’ve done is gone ballistic every time someone hurt your poor little feelings. You would write a way too long reply, whining about how unfair you were treated... how you were such a victim. You came to me a couple of times saying you were going to leave and go to Reddit because Voat is too rough. Makes sense now. 🙄

Not only have you not earned any respect or credibility, you HAVE established that you are a hypocrite, delusional, weak, emotional, petty, manipulative, selfish, and don’t have a firm grip on reality. How about, instead of wasting anymore time, making a fool out of yourself by writing such long comments filled with absolute hate filled bullshit, that most will skim over and read less than half of, you should take your bipolar and anxiety meds, your blood pressure pills, calm the fuck down, realize you are looking like a shittier person with every rant you post, call a loved one and put them thru hell like I’m sure you’ve done your whole “victimized” life, and then pick your ass back up, be a big girl, wipe off that mascara, and move on. That’s what normal people do.

You are just one person. One that that is emotionally weak and can’t handle conflict. I have zero respect for you. I don’t give a shit what you think of me. I know my heart. I know why I’m here. I have the support of many others that know that I’m here for the right reason. There are always going to be little cunts that say we have egos or a need to feel powerful. That’s because that’s all you can come up with. I’ve seen the same things said about mods since I joined Voat. You’re like an annoying parrot who mimics what other butt hurt users have said when everything doesn’t go there way. If you’re married, I feel sorry for your husband. You must put him thru hell.

Get back to living life. Go fake and act like a nice little Q following patriot. I hope Q is watching. They should see the weak ones that can’t hang, and try to selfishly cause division because they think the world revolves around them. This movement is a lot bigger than us. The board can’t stop because some narcissistic steemit user, who thinks she’s an amazing author, can’t control her emotions. Trump can’t stand weak people. So, get over yourself. Stop wasting our time.

Yes, I am pinging mods. You also post on pizzagate. When there are overly emotional little manipulators like you, it’s best everyone be aware in case you try pulling the same shit on someone else.

@Vindicator @Think- @Shizy @MolochHunter @Kevdude

Crensch ago

@Empress @ArtofChoke @MadWorld @gabara @ExpertShitposter

I think this is one of my better comments lately - thought you'd enjoy.

Also https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2789691/14505906

Crensch ago

@Trigglypuff @heygeorge @MolochHunter @clamhurt_legbeard @Rainy-Day-Dream

See parent (and parent) and link. Fun reading, IMO.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

Ohhhhhhh my god.

Ain't nobody got time for that much autism lol. I'm still trying to finish reading The Odyssey.

Writing style seems different from previous censorship ranters. New aspie??

srayzie ago

This lady is a freak!

clamhurt_legbeard ago

Yeah, I've seen some walls of text in my time, but we need to get this girl working for ICE.

She'll get that thing built in a week.

srayzie ago

Lol

Crensch ago

It's easier if you just read my responses and glance at the quoted text.

Yeah, new personality of the sensitive "good christian lady" that writes like that SoberSecondThought faggot. Whether totally new aspie, or just a new personality of an old one, I know not.

I've never met someone so bad at writing here, and I have trouble imagining someone being capable of lowering their standards THAT much for a new identity.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

yeah i agree

this is hardcore