You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Empire_of_the_mind ago

These numbers are what ends the corona virus scam. The reason you're not seeing a large increase at this part of the year, like you might normally, is that the people who would have died from flu/pneumonia this winter already caught it earlier in the year - all that happened this year was the winter seasonal flu and cold death spike was moved to earlier in the year.

Helena73 ago

Just going to copy and paste what I wrote earlier from the identical post in GA and other similar posts and Im frankly Im getting tired of people not looking closely at the numbers. Anyone who is not a lazy turd can spend 5 or 10 minutes looking at the charts cited here and see that the numbers of total deaths ARE WAY UP. Just look at the numbers people. 5th grade math.

Compare completed data from cdc each week compared to the previous 3 year average (percent expected deaths)

March through Sept. 2020: 1,828,350

The previous 3 year average (March through September only): 1,524,444

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/index.htm

From mid march to mid september total deaths all causes is up 17%. Deaths for weeks past september are incomplete and artificially low. When you adjust for a long term trend of about 2% annual increase of deaths, you still have over 15% more deaths than expected.

See my more detailed math here.

https://voat.co/v/theawakening/4135945/26573927

Even the CDC page the OP linked to shows that 12 month tally for July 2019 to June 2020 to be over 3 million. And that is a 12 month interval that only includes 4 months of the epidemic.

https://files.catbox.moe/m3gm3h.jpeg

THE 2020 DATA IS NOT COMPLETE. Hello!

Not only is the month of December missing from the OPs number but the months of November and October are grossly incomplete as they state on the CDC page. Even numbers from September and August are still not complete. Its the government.

The final number will be over 3 million. 3.1 or 3.2 maybe.

Go ahead. Challenge my math. Try to find an error. Just please fucking do the math.

Rexyl ago

I agree with this post completely. I've been looking at similar posts about provincial and national numbers that declare deaths are down and they always end up being bullshit. Now that being said in Canada deaths ARE up by about 5,000 but they were also up 5,000 from the year before last year, and the year before that...

Not that we don't have a ton of obese people up here but perhaps it's the result of higher obesity rates in the USA. Or just completely made up numbers, at this point I don't know if I can believe anything that federal organizations are reporting.

Helena73 ago

Its just demographics. The boomers are getting to that age I guess. An analyst pointed out there has been an average 2% rise in deaths every year for the past several years. In the US anyway.

Deaths will be way up in northern cities in the US and Canada until April. The virus will then go away in the north for 6 or 8 months. Very pronounced seasonal fluctuation up north.

I started giving my pet old person low dose ivermectin (8mg / week) and quinine (liter/day) which hopefully he will keep up for 4 months. And he’s being discouraged from running around the neighborhood off leash till then. We live in the worst hit area basically in the world, and we know several people who died at this point. I try to impress upon him that he just needs to lay low for the winter when the risk is 10 or 20 times higher than the rest of the year.

I dont know if I trust anything the government does anymore but I do trust total deaths all causes reasonably well even if I don’t trust them to categorize cause of death properly. A 17% increase in deaths all causes seems reasonable to me

Empire_of_the_mind ago

I actually do know the real numbers and noticed the CDC's claim that recent death numbers lag 1-8 week, along with the claim that most weeks of the year are +100%. (Note that I don't think CDC data is worth much to begin with). The real point of highlighting these numbers is psychological - most people have no concept of how many people die every year and they're easily manipulated by various figures thrown at them - this effect is why they've been inflating deaths attributed to the novel coronavirus? It may seem important to you but the difference between 3.1 million and 2.9 million is not enough to convince people to shut down their entire society. A plague showing 2x death rates or more is what you'd need for that.

Further, virology and disease are all rather questionably linked. The world does not work the way medical science tells you it does - they're no more correct than people using leeches to bleed disease a few centuries ago. Once you lose the hubris of present-moment bias you'll see that worshipping the medical industry is retarded.

Finally, I don't care if 200k fat people die this year or next, it's only a matter of a few years difference and the health care system is going to save a mint after this year. A novel coronavirus, practically by definition, is going to pluck the low-hanging fruit from the tree. It's going to cull the weakest of the herd. Aside from a few people who got extraordinary viral loads introduced through unusual circumstances this virus only impacts people with completely ineffective immune systems. Imagine the degree of ill health needed to fully compromise an immune system against a virus from a common class you should've been exposed to dozens of times prior in your life.

Helena73 ago

It may seem important to you but the difference between 3.1 million and 2.9 million is not enough to convince people to shut down their entire society.

Yeah I get that but most of the quarantine/lockdown/social distancing measures were misapplied and largely useless —therefore unnecessary.

The only places where quarantines/school closures/cancelling large social gatherings ever made sense was with northern cities, december through march. The virus doesn’t spred very rapidly in southern warmer states. The virus doesn’t spread rapidly in rural areas. We didn’t need to apply quarantining and social distancing in those places. Prophylactic hydoxychloroquine, ivermectin, doxycycline could have been given to high risk populations. Urban “hotspots” could have likewise used population wide prophylactics to curb the spread. Lots of useful measures could have been implemented to prevent spread in targeted areas while protecting targeted high risk groups.

But no, it seems there are two equally stupid camps:

1. commie karens drunk with power who will punish anyone they can, regardless of whether it helps prevent the spread of covid, who assiduously prevent the elderly from gaining access to life saving drugs

2. Obtuse scamdemic partisans who, because they perceive the epidemic has been used as an excuse for a commie power grab, deny the existence of the virus altogether or when cornered claim “fat old people deserve to die”

Is there any other perspective besides these two options? Is there? Is your only defense against a tyrannical communist crackdown: “old people are low hanging fruit— fuck them”

Hundreds of thousands of old people were needlessly infected and this continues everyday. They are taken prisoner and held in a hospital broom closet, left to die alone, forbidden from seeing family members in their last moments. Its an atrocity. All you can say is fuck fat people. Maybe you should rethink this view.

Further, virology and disease are all rather questionably linked. The world does not work the way medical science tells you it does - they're no more correct than people using leeches to bleed disease a few centuries ago.

Agree. The healthcare system has become hopelessly corrupt. Its run by lawyers and commie social workers and bean counters and insurance salesmen. The ranks of healthcare workers are filled with midwits who don’t understand how to read a medical study critically, who follow protocols blindly and bring not an ounce of common science to their day-to-day decisions. Follow protocols, cover your ass, rinse repeat. I fucking get it. Im not impressed with state issued credetials and a whiff of scientism.

My tools are research and a bullshit detector. But I don’t deny a medical crisis exists because its inconvenient to a political narrative. One out of 500 people have died in my state. Of covid. Out of all people in the state. That could double this winter.

That could happen everywhere in the next couple years. Demand prophylaxis and otc antivirals instead of minimizing the problem.

jammicsmith ago

Even numbers from September and August are still not complete. Its the government.

Yep, just like votes. They need to see what they need first. Then they'll report whatever they want to justify fucking us.

Helena73 ago

Well look, doctors and coroners have to write out the death certificates. Then the CDC has to enter them. These are bureaucrats. It is not new that the numbers are incomplete. I saw the same thing when I looked at this chart 8 months ago. The note on the CDC page states that a study from 2016 determine the period prior to the latest 8 weeks was at least 75% complete, indicating that they didn’t just start holding back death data.

Really you guys need to account for the fact that most bureacracy is a total clusterfuck and it is a rare thing for them to be able to accomplish anything in a coordinated manner.

jammicsmith ago

doctors and coroners have to write out the death certificates.

Wow. That sounds really complicated. I'm sure glad we trust doctors with guiding us through this deadly pandemic when they're so overworked (or incompetent) that they can't get death certificates written with 8 weeks.

Helena73 ago

What do you want me to say to you? That doctors aren’t very responsible and don’t prioritize this paperwork sufficiently? I have no idea.

That bureaucrats are lazy and inefficient? What difference does it make.

This is how long it takes. Its a bureacracy

Waaahh! Bureacracies are slow. Maybe being super sarcastic to Helena will change that.

Whatever.

FarPointPatriot ago

Statsfag here. Can confirm anon is 100% correct. What is out of place is the normality of the daths by natural cause % increase in conjunction with all causes total. The % increase is almost identical. Your would expect, in a pandemic, for rate of increase of natural causes to diverge as "covid" or what ever pushes the total higher. This is not the case deaths increased normally in almost all categories. BOTTOM LINE .... NOT A PANDEMIC AT ALL.

Helena73 ago

What is out of place is the normality of the daths by natural cause %

How are you calculating “natural cause”? You mean total - covid deaths? What table are you looking at?

You are saying deaths from other causes went up too? Covid deaths did not entirely account for “excess deaths” above the expected number. Is that what you mean?

In a previous post, an article discussed that deaths have been increasing by about 2% a year on average due to aging population— which accounts for some of the increase in total deaths. That 2% seems to account for about half the disparity I see between non-covid deaths and expected deaths, after covid is removed. The additional 2 percent or so could be due to isolation, suicide, disruption of normal timely healthcare. Or there could be a errors in diagnosis or death certificates, and those are actual covid deaths.

I suspect March deaths were a bit low (like 1%) because everyone was very compliant with lockdown initially and virtually all economic activity ceased, yet people had not started dying of covid in high numbers. A lot of people got sick in March and died in April.

Hardly anyone died of covid in the northern states like new york, Michegan, etc because northern areas are following a pronounced seasonal trend for covid just like for the flu. The north is nearly covid free for 6 months a year. The sun-belt has less of a seasonal trend for flu and the same proved true for covid. The spread there is slower and year round . But that is why deaths dropped a lot in June.

I don’t think this trend is artificial or controlled.

FarPointPatriot ago

I did not 'calculate' natural cause. That is a category within the CDC data set.

You causative analysis on March deaths is completely fallacious. If your logic were solid, then when PPE was mandated all across the country in late summer, there would NOT have been spikes UPWARD. There WOULD NOT have been a massive UPSURGE in April and May. If PPE was effective in any way, then the numbers (observations) should have moved dramatically outside the standard deviations. THEY DID NOT.

I SAY AGAIN .... NOTHING ABOUT DEATH DATA IS OUTSIDE OF NORMAL. NOTHING.

NO PANDEMIC.

Helena73 ago

I did not 'calculate' natural cause. That is a category within the CDC data set.

Yes okay. Can you tell me where to find “natural cause” on the tables?

You are mixing two signals. North and south tell radically different stories. Northern cities are showing clear seasonal spikes with low infection spread throughout the summer. Just like the flu.

The sunbelt cities had low infections in March and April due largely to the draconian shut downs in spring. But after the restrictions began lifting they showed a moderate infection rate throughout the summer which is comparable to the moderate year round flu rate in those areas ( i.e. no strong seasonal fluctuation).

The surgical masks don’t seem to be doing much in the way of preventing spread so I don’t think PPE is particularly relevant here.

Population density, hours of daylight, temperature, humidity, — these are more relevant factors. Perhaps cancelling school and large gatherings can make a difference in some “hotspots”.

FarPointPatriot ago

go to cdc site. find cdc download data. It's a field in the all deaths table. its not hard. the fact you had to ask proves you have no clue what you are talking about and are only making speculation.

YOU: "The surgical masks don’t seem to be doing much in the way of preventing spread so I don’t think PPE is particularly relevant here."

ALSO YOU: "I suspect March deaths were a bit low (like 1%) because everyone was very compliant"

Helena73 ago

I cannot download data right now. I just wanted a link to a table that showed “natural causes” nationwide by week.

But you refused to include a link. So I hunted around for 5 minutes. I could only see natural causes broken out by state. Which I can’t download.

I guess if you do know where the relevant table is, you absolutely refuse to include a link. You are just one of those people.

I think Ive made the distinction multiple times between full lockdown (no one leaving their houses) and people resuming their normal lives with a thin tissue over their mouths. But you refuse to acknowlege any distinction whatsoever. You can’t separate the two at all, its just all “compliance with scamdemic” but I assure you these are different behaviors with different effects on epidemics.

There is no contradiction here. People stayed home in March and April more than any other months. There were no car accidents. There were no drive by shootings. All non-emergency surgeries were cancelled. This drove down non-covid deaths A LITTLE. Temporarily. And completely halted spread of covid in the sunbelt were it wasn’t really spreading fast anyway.

In May and June people in the Sunbelt started leaving their houses, leading to a modest uptick in cases in the South. Surgical masks probably did not play a significant factor.

But if you want to be perverse and continue to deny any distinction between these factors, carry on with your willful ignorance.

FarPointPatriot ago

Do your own work.

You are pissing away time replying to me instead of actual research ... which I seriously doubt you have ever done.

Your posts are RIFE with faulty assumptions. Read a book.

Helena73 ago

Thats what I thought.