(11) @kevdude - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 74661 (Waited till we hit 10 users before I added myself to the list. I hate this motherfucker)
HE IS NOW ACCUSING ALL THE PEOPLE ON THIS LIST OF DOWNVOTING HIM. DO YOU THINK HE SPRAYPAINTS SWASTIKAS ON HIS OWN GARAGE AND THEN BLAMES WHITE PEOPLE? https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2929314/15724062
go away fatty, you were banned for vote manipulation. funny how NO ONE defends you here, not even your addict buddies come to your aid anymore. oh well, have another drink to drown the pain
racist Whites should be chemically castrated to prevent racist offspring.
Easily turned against you, never allow your government to decide who can reproduce and who cannot, much like the police state built to keep niggers in line, it can easily be turned against those who it is meant to favor.
If you want to see them face real justice, do it yourself. Government intervention is almost always overkill, and they always want their cut.
This law sounds good on the surface, but realize that if it passes no man will be able to be alone and near a child. Every nigress with a child and a friend will hunt down lone males and threaten to call the police on him unless the man pays up. In court it would be his word against 2 others.
Condition of parole. I've never been in the situation of experiencing parole, but if parole is optional, then it's not forced, so serve your sentence and be done with it.
Communists don't have points or principles, only pretenses meant to enable them to commit crimes.
Much like when they attacked GWB correctly, and then apologized for Obama continuing the exact same administration, they don't really believe in anything other than their statist overlords.
They will make any noises they think will enable them to get their way like the children they are.
Defending rights has always meant defending bastards.
Don't want the feds in your phone? Guess you defend a bastard with kiddie porno.
Don't want refusal to answer a question (ie, silence) used against you in court? Guess you defend a bastards who gunned someone down.
These cases make precedent, which is then used against everyone.
It's great until they start using chemical castration for any rapist, which is the natural progression. Then when some random bitch who you had a drunk hookup with can ensure you never have a kid because she regretted it.
No, the precedent that a crime can result in castration. If the left gets back in power, they remove castration for pedos and instead claim it needs to be performed on any man over a certain T level, or a man who makes bad comments on the internet, because of toxic masculinity and obviously these dangerous men are a danger to women, so castrate them.
I'm actually curious as to whether she has a credible argument on the constitutionality (or lack thereof really) of such punishment for such crimes or if she is simply using the word as a magical incantation. I mean I think I could construct such an argument, but I am doubtful it would prevail when fully tested in the court system. I have a feeling she has no clue and just thinks using those words gives her feelings power.
Cruel and unusual punishment. 8th amendment. We don't mutilate people for any other crime so it's definitely unusual. With the way the public is easily whipped into a fury over sex crimes, giving the government the power to castrate people because a mother dislikes someone and invented a story is incredibly dangerous.
This may seem a bit extreme, but personally I think the law should consider the nature of the offense. For example, in Canada, 16 years old is considered an adult provided no photos are taken, the 16 year old consents, and the actual adult isn't in a position of authority (teacher, doctor, coach, etc.).
I think a man attacking and raping a 4 year old girl should have a more serious punishment attached to it than if a 15 year old boy has sex with a 19 year old girl consentually.
That's fairly close to what I think. Granted I don't have enough data to put forth accurate numbers.
I think clearly a hard line at any age where one day either way is stupid. 17 years 11 months 30 days and 18 years 1 day is a crime in many places despite Whole two day age difference. There should be some provision for similar age with a lower limit. Then another limit for dissimilar age, 18 is close though perhaps not exactly right.
No matter the details like any law it is only effective with equal enforcement. There are tons of niggers and spics that should be in jail for pedophilia under any law.
Nothing in the constitution about this topic. at all. In fact Im pretty sure founding fathers who wrote the fucking thing would have thought of pedo criminals as lower than murderers. So fair trial, then capital execution. Cool constitution bruh.
dude, I'm not that Amanda chick, so I have no fucking clue what she was going on about. I just know OP is a fucking idiot that jumps to conclusions. If you want to act like you can read minds go for it, you'll just look stupid.
Chemical castration isn't permanent. Neither is it cruel or unusual. Child rapists are incarcerated to prevent them from raping more kids in addition to it being punishment. Chemical castration will allow them to lead normal lives without public fear they will rape again. It is more humane than incarceration and cost the public less.
I doubt pedos even existed at that time in the way they do today. Like imagine trying to show the founding fathers a picture of a gay pride parade. They wouldn't be able to understand it.
Honestly, given the way we define pedo today, there were probably many more in the past. It's actually modern law in civilized countries that prevent the union or interaction between adults and children. In every single country of the world that doesnt engage in western values, they still fuck children (think Arabia, Amazonian tribes, continental Niglets).
The idea that we on the right shouldn't jump to conclusions like the left does is a good idea.
We shouldn't jump to conclusions.
Look, I'm an asshole sometimes and a troll, but we should all make a minimal effort to try to continue to improve our side of the political spectrum, share ideas, and conquer the Left.
These "hurr durr" comments are embarrassing and unproductive. All it demonstrates is that you are seemingly incapable of considering someone else's viewpoint, so you resort to a verbal attack.
Don't be like the Left; be better than the Left, brother
or she is just defending the constitution? will chemical castration even make them less likely to offend? If you think just removing someones balls stops them from being a predator then you must have a very low opinion of men. could be that the pedo just becomes more effeminate, gets a sex change and then starts abusing little boys instead, which isnt a solution.
"As a condition of parole" So not forced and totally optional. So not part of sentencing. So not cruel and unusual punishment, which is what she would refer to if citing the constitution directly.
You have no clue what she is referring to. Thats the point of me calling out OP. She could have not grasped the "As a condition of parole", or thought something else. Its just stupidity trying to act like we can read minds.
What parts of the constitution would apply to the situation?
GO ASK HER, PUSSY! STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW SOMETHING YOU DON'T KNOW!! What the fuck is up with you punk ass's just wanting to assume things. Wait let me guess you didn't grow up with a daddy did you? Mine taught me that to assume something just makes an ass of u and me.
That women(?) just wrote one word. OP and you assuming to know what exactly she meant and her full intentions by using that one word is idiotic. If OP had balls he would have asked her.
Government sanctioned castration can easily be turned against the people it is meant to protect, especially considering how many likely pedos are in government.
Normie-Vision ago
dk, i just know that they are liars and manipulators.
fuck @kevdude would write shit the same way about myself, 95% was straight out bullshit.
watch come now, and bring the "if you 10 people i'll leave post" Its funny because I knew he would fall for it. I wanted names from the goon squad.
@seanbox is so brain dead to this day he still calls me sane
@madworld stole a sub verse from me
@puttitout turns a blind eye to PV downvoat brigades
Also @kevdude has asked be to brigade a verse for him
Also this site is filled with shit alts
-dial_indicator
below is the goon squad
(1) @SeanBox - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 9566 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15719769
(2) @MadWorld - Member for: 3.3 years / Comment Contribution Points: 9923 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15719966
(3) @argosciv - Member for: 2 years / Comment Contribution Points: 1334 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720111
(4) @LivingRedInBlue - Member for: 1 year / Comment Contribution Points: 651 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720138
(5) @Professorballs - Member for: 1.8 years / Comment Contribution Points: 297 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720151
(6) @dan_k - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 5377 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720480
(7) @VicariousJambi - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 7846 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720111
(8) @hungry_mungry - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 2359 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720973
(9) @HillBoulder - Member for: 1.8 years / Comment Contribution Points: 8631 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15720927
(10) @Shekelstein6M - Member for: 2.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 21182 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15721180
(11) @kevdude - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 74661 (Waited till we hit 10 users before I added myself to the list. I hate this motherfucker)
(12) @BLOODandHONOUR - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 35090 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15721795
(13) @I_Always_Lie - Member for: 12 months (1 year) / Comment Contribution Points: 2978 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15721750
(14) @Crensch - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 33318 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15721473
(15) @Javik2186 - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 4908 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15722183
at this point he claims everyone on this list is a "Q-tard" https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15722476
(16) @Rotteuxx - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 25482 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15722629
(17) @Fetalpig - Member for: 1.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 5569 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15722829
(18) @carlip - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 16272 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15723855
At this point he claims that all the people on the list are 3 month old accounts with 200 ccp (I updated the list to include user stats) https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2929314/15723704
(19) @Inaminit - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 6361 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15723961
HE IS NOW ACCUSING ALL THE PEOPLE ON THIS LIST OF DOWNVOTING HIM. DO YOU THINK HE SPRAYPAINTS SWASTIKAS ON HIS OWN GARAGE AND THEN BLAMES WHITE PEOPLE? https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/2929314/15724062
(20) @Renatus - Member for: 3 months / Comment Contribution Points: 1084 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15724219 (EXCELLENT WRITE UP IN HIS SIGNING STATEMENT)
(21) @CameraCode - Member for: 9 days / Comment Contribution Points: 273 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15725053
(22) @Intrixina - Member for: 2 years / Comment Contribution Points: 1158 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15725768
(23) @RumpRangerRick - Member for: 2.9 years / Comment Contribution Points: 9003 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15727984
(24) @shewhomustbeobeyed - Member for: 2 years / Comment Contribution Points: 2660 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15728527
(25) @FridayJones - Member for: 3.1 years / Comment Contribution Points: 3108 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15730687
(26) @Hand_of_Node - Member for: 6 months / Comment Contribution Points: 5965 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15736801
(27) @TheKobold - Member for: 3.4 years / Comment Contribution Points: 21965 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15734244
(28) @turbola - Member for: 2.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 329 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15742234
(29) @blumen4alles - Member for: 1.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 607 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15751945
(30) @Shes2fat4me5 - Member for: 1.9 years / Comment Contribution Points: 223 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15752451
(31) @Mumbleberry - Member for: 1.9 years / Comment Contribution Points: 11698 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15753673
(32) @AaronBuurr - Member for: 2 months / Comment Contribution Points: 188 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15762995
(33) @Runway22L - Member for: 2.2 years / Comment Contribution Points: 11987 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15773666
https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15792714
(34) @Splooge - Member for: 9 months / Comment Contribution Points: 4443 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/15797116
(35) @sguevar - Member for: 2 years / Comment Contribution Points: 3445 https://voat.co/v/CostaRicaPuraVida/2957224
(36) @draaaak - Member for: 3.5 years / Comment Contribution Points: 23686 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/16099539
(37) @CognitiveDissident5 - Member for: 1.7 years / Comment Contribution Points: 11697 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/16156275
(38) @King_Leopold_II - Member for: 2 months / Comment Contribution Points: 1483 https://voat.co/v/whatever/2930125/16553685
(39) @drstrangegov - Member for: 2.3 years / Comment Contribution Points: 6613 https://voat.co/v/funny/3060109/17016552
Alcoholics_R_Us ago
go away fatty, you were banned for vote manipulation. funny how NO ONE defends you here, not even your addict buddies come to your aid anymore. oh well, have another drink to drown the pain
ArcturianDeathTrap ago
Imagine showing a 13 year old woman to the Founding Fathers, when the lifespan of people was half of what it is now
BoredomAccount214 ago
Easily turned against you, never allow your government to decide who can reproduce and who cannot, much like the police state built to keep niggers in line, it can easily be turned against those who it is meant to favor.
If you want to see them face real justice, do it yourself. Government intervention is almost always overkill, and they always want their cut.
goytoynamedtroy ago
>comparing pedos to WNs
Yeah....fuck off.
BoredomAccount214 ago
That wasn't the point of this comment, brainlet.
conservativecanuck ago
Your comment changed my mind. I didn't really think about how this could be turned against us, and we all know it eventually would be.
imdrowning ago
There are a bunch of them doing this, gross idiots
newlurkeraccount ago
This law sounds good on the surface, but realize that if it passes no man will be able to be alone and near a child. Every nigress with a child and a friend will hunt down lone males and threaten to call the police on him unless the man pays up. In court it would be his word against 2 others.
WordCorrector ago
They only use the Constitution when it gives them leverage, but ultimately they hate the Constitution and would do away with it if they had their way.
BumpMeansCoke ago
But child castration aka "gender reassignment" IS constitutional? The hell is wrong with these leftists?
armday2day ago
Because it cruel and unusual or just because they like throwing words around with any idea what words mean?
user9713 ago
Condition of parole. I've never been in the situation of experiencing parole, but if parole is optional, then it's not forced, so serve your sentence and be done with it.
Rainy-Day-Dream ago
tbh I don't mind being on the wrong side of history or any other side as long as it's not the pedo side of history
Crikes ago
Communists don't have points or principles, only pretenses meant to enable them to commit crimes.
Much like when they attacked GWB correctly, and then apologized for Obama continuing the exact same administration, they don't really believe in anything other than their statist overlords.
They will make any noises they think will enable them to get their way like the children they are.
captainstrange ago
Amanda needs to be castrated too.
lord_nougat ago
Amanda? A man, duh!
captainstrange ago
hello nougaty one.
lord_nougat ago
Ahoy, cap'n!
captainstrange ago
https://voat.co/v/Shitlist
Have you seen this? It's next level autism but the shitposting is glorious.
lord_nougat ago
Wow, I gotta get myself on that list!
captainstrange ago
I know, was thinking the same thing!
Shitpost enough maybe. But it's a fairly short list so it has to be something spectacular.
lord_nougat ago
I wonder if merely taking a huge shit on the list would be sufficiently provocative...
captainstrange ago
haha DO IT.
muffalettadiver ago
Demon hypocrites
Mathurin1911 ago
Defending rights has always meant defending bastards.
Don't want the feds in your phone? Guess you defend a bastard with kiddie porno. Don't want refusal to answer a question (ie, silence) used against you in court? Guess you defend a bastards who gunned someone down.
These cases make precedent, which is then used against everyone.
imdrowning ago
you mean the precedent that if you fuck kids under 13 they nuke your sex drive. I will accept this one
Fred ago
It's great until they start using chemical castration for any rapist, which is the natural progression. Then when some random bitch who you had a drunk hookup with can ensure you never have a kid because she regretted it.
imdrowning ago
valid
Demon ago
No, the precedent that a crime can result in castration. If the left gets back in power, they remove castration for pedos and instead claim it needs to be performed on any man over a certain T level, or a man who makes bad comments on the internet, because of toxic masculinity and obviously these dangerous men are a danger to women, so castrate them.
imdrowning ago
hmmmmm, ok you have a massive point there but if they start that shit, it`ll be time to revolt. Can't believe it isnt that time already
Thisismyvoatusername ago
I'm actually curious as to whether she has a credible argument on the constitutionality (or lack thereof really) of such punishment for such crimes or if she is simply using the word as a magical incantation. I mean I think I could construct such an argument, but I am doubtful it would prevail when fully tested in the court system. I have a feeling she has no clue and just thinks using those words gives her feelings power.
Mylon ago
Cruel and unusual punishment. 8th amendment. We don't mutilate people for any other crime so it's definitely unusual. With the way the public is easily whipped into a fury over sex crimes, giving the government the power to castrate people because a mother dislikes someone and invented a story is incredibly dangerous.
drakesdoom2 ago
If you rob a store with a gun you become a felon and have no gun rights.
If you rape a child you are a pedo and your dick gets lopped off.
Seems fair to me.
conservativecanuck ago
This may seem a bit extreme, but personally I think the law should consider the nature of the offense. For example, in Canada, 16 years old is considered an adult provided no photos are taken, the 16 year old consents, and the actual adult isn't in a position of authority (teacher, doctor, coach, etc.).
I think a man attacking and raping a 4 year old girl should have a more serious punishment attached to it than if a 15 year old boy has sex with a 19 year old girl consentually.
Thoughts?
drakesdoom2 ago
That's fairly close to what I think. Granted I don't have enough data to put forth accurate numbers.
I think clearly a hard line at any age where one day either way is stupid. 17 years 11 months 30 days and 18 years 1 day is a crime in many places despite Whole two day age difference. There should be some provision for similar age with a lower limit. Then another limit for dissimilar age, 18 is close though perhaps not exactly right.
No matter the details like any law it is only effective with equal enforcement. There are tons of niggers and spics that should be in jail for pedophilia under any law.
Niggardly_Jew ago
The constitution is shit anyway.
Folke ago
@Amandaleighbb72 only stated its unconstitutional, nothing about being for it or against. Shouldn't jump to conclusions like the left does.
KillerKap ago
Nothing in the constitution about this topic. at all. In fact Im pretty sure founding fathers who wrote the fucking thing would have thought of pedo criminals as lower than murderers. So fair trial, then capital execution. Cool constitution bruh.
Folke ago
dude, I'm not that Amanda chick, so I have no fucking clue what she was going on about. I just know OP is a fucking idiot that jumps to conclusions. If you want to act like you can read minds go for it, you'll just look stupid.
Fred ago
Amendment 8
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
BoredomAccount214 ago
Capital execution isn't what is proposed, chemical castration is cruel and unusual punishment, come on dude.
We all hate pedos. (All, except for the closet pedos obviously)
But completely forgetting to think and mirroring leftists just because of how disgusting we find them is foolish
Magi ago
Chemical castration isn't permanent. Neither is it cruel or unusual. Child rapists are incarcerated to prevent them from raping more kids in addition to it being punishment. Chemical castration will allow them to lead normal lives without public fear they will rape again. It is more humane than incarceration and cost the public less.
Folke ago
So is a bullet.
Niggardly_Jew ago
I doubt pedos even existed at that time in the way they do today. Like imagine trying to show the founding fathers a picture of a gay pride parade. They wouldn't be able to understand it.
conservativecanuck ago
Honestly, given the way we define pedo today, there were probably many more in the past. It's actually modern law in civilized countries that prevent the union or interaction between adults and children. In every single country of the world that doesnt engage in western values, they still fuck children (think Arabia, Amazonian tribes, continental Niglets).
KillerKap ago
They would kill it with fire immediately.
Niggardly_Jew ago
That's interesting, because the founders liked the Greek / Romans.
goytoynamedtroy ago
>hurr durr you're just like them
She is defending pedos by citing the constitution.
Fuck off.
conservativecanuck ago
Enough with the "hurr durrs"
The idea that we on the right shouldn't jump to conclusions like the left does is a good idea. We shouldn't jump to conclusions.
Look, I'm an asshole sometimes and a troll, but we should all make a minimal effort to try to continue to improve our side of the political spectrum, share ideas, and conquer the Left.
These "hurr durr" comments are embarrassing and unproductive. All it demonstrates is that you are seemingly incapable of considering someone else's viewpoint, so you resort to a verbal attack.
Don't be like the Left; be better than the Left, brother
mudbear ago
or she is just defending the constitution? will chemical castration even make them less likely to offend? If you think just removing someones balls stops them from being a predator then you must have a very low opinion of men. could be that the pedo just becomes more effeminate, gets a sex change and then starts abusing little boys instead, which isnt a solution.
abattoirdaydream ago
"As a condition of parole" So not forced and totally optional. So not part of sentencing. So not cruel and unusual punishment, which is what she would refer to if citing the constitution directly.
Folke ago
You have no clue what she is referring to. Thats the point of me calling out OP. She could have not grasped the "As a condition of parole", or thought something else. Its just stupidity trying to act like we can read minds.
abattoirdaydream ago
She said "Unconstitutional!" What parts of the constitution would apply to the situation? Her unknowable reading comp skills are irrelevant .
Folke ago
GO ASK HER, PUSSY! STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW SOMETHING YOU DON'T KNOW!! What the fuck is up with you punk ass's just wanting to assume things. Wait let me guess you didn't grow up with a daddy did you? Mine taught me that to assume something just makes an ass of u and me.
That women(?) just wrote one word. OP and you assuming to know what exactly she meant and her full intentions by using that one word is idiotic. If OP had balls he would have asked her.
abattoirdaydream ago
Lol
theoldones ago
ask her if gun control is unconstitutional and watch fireworks happen.
AntiMason ago
Muh muskets?
J_Darnley ago
Always ask if the first amendment applies only to the printing press.
Haywood_Jablomeme ago
Puckle gun.
goatmensch ago
Nothing cruel or unusual about it as far as anyone who isn't an absolute degenerate is concerned.
BoredomAccount214 ago
Government sanctioned castration can easily be turned against the people it is meant to protect, especially considering how many likely pedos are in government.