Liberal comes out in defense of the constitution to prevent pedo castration (catbox.moe)
submitted ago by goytoynamedtroy
JPG
Open
JPG
Open
view the rest of the comments →
Folke ago
@Amandaleighbb72 only stated its unconstitutional, nothing about being for it or against. Shouldn't jump to conclusions like the left does.
goytoynamedtroy ago
>hurr durr you're just like them
She is defending pedos by citing the constitution.
Fuck off.
mudbear ago
or she is just defending the constitution? will chemical castration even make them less likely to offend? If you think just removing someones balls stops them from being a predator then you must have a very low opinion of men. could be that the pedo just becomes more effeminate, gets a sex change and then starts abusing little boys instead, which isnt a solution.
abattoirdaydream ago
"As a condition of parole" So not forced and totally optional. So not part of sentencing. So not cruel and unusual punishment, which is what she would refer to if citing the constitution directly.
Folke ago
You have no clue what she is referring to. Thats the point of me calling out OP. She could have not grasped the "As a condition of parole", or thought something else. Its just stupidity trying to act like we can read minds.
abattoirdaydream ago
She said "Unconstitutional!" What parts of the constitution would apply to the situation? Her unknowable reading comp skills are irrelevant .
Folke ago
GO ASK HER, PUSSY! STOP ACTING LIKE YOU KNOW SOMETHING YOU DON'T KNOW!! What the fuck is up with you punk ass's just wanting to assume things. Wait let me guess you didn't grow up with a daddy did you? Mine taught me that to assume something just makes an ass of u and me.
That women(?) just wrote one word. OP and you assuming to know what exactly she meant and her full intentions by using that one word is idiotic. If OP had balls he would have asked her.
abattoirdaydream ago
Lol