This post is an advisory to users that your username is connected to whatever you write in anon subs.
What you write can be seen by one or more devs who’ve been given that special access. But what you may not know is that they can and do use it against you as they’ve done with me in the past and as recently as yesterday. And one or more of those users who have this ability are part of SBBH.
Some history: One of the SBBH members had a hissy fit with me over a year ago and is probably the same user who would “miraculously” happen to know it was me when I would write certain things in anon subs in the past. I’d write something and they’d make a snarky remark revealing that they knew were talking to my account. It wasn’t a huge deal but it made me aware that my username could be seen by one or more users with this special access.
Back to present day: I’d never bothered to get caught up in SBBH drama until about a week ago when I started needling them in anon subs with a comment here or there regarding their questionable activities on voat.
It didn’t take long for one of them to take the bait and clearly refer to me when making this remark about my recent comments:
http://archive.is/eBPYZ
My account is exactly 2.7 years old. Whoever wrote that comment was a fool; for so obviously ‘giving away’ that they could see it was me writing those comments (showing their hand), and to give such a sensitive shit over what I wrote (notice it took anti-SBBH comments for them to get fresh and reveal themselves).
Let this story be a warning to any of you that this ‘special access’ to see which user is writing “anon” comments creates an unfair advantage and in the wrong hands can be used against you. At the same time, these privileged few are able to enjoy the ability to hide in anon subs themselves.
@PuttItOut, users will never be free to “have their say” in anon subs until everyone but you is stripped of the ability to see who’s posting what in so-called anon subs.
--
Edit: Hey, cool! My post got a "Speculation" flair. Perhaps the first in voat's history in v/Whatever.
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
Your post is misleading and filled with incorrect statements.
No one has access to any area of voat but me, there is no such thing as special access.
NeedleStack ago
Well shit, like I said in this earlier comment, if I was mistaken so be it - and that it would take only word from you for me to believe I was mistaken.
But your comment is coming off as accusing me of making something up intentionally. You know, A LIE. Which is not what I did or would do.
Everything I said I experienced was what I perceived it to be. I didn't post from a place of misleading or implying. And I'm not going to correct my wording because it was what I thought to be true.
I'm seriously put off by the way you responded. I'm not just some shithead. I actually care a lot about this place and have done a lot of work in subs and with other members across voat for nearly 3 years but whatever, I guess my bringing up a valid concern boils me down to being an asshole huh.
If it's happening as a bug and it will get fixed, great!
This post blew up larger than I thought it would but good came out of it; commenters bringing up a lot of important stuff we need to square away as a community anyway (brigading, witch-hunts, vote manipulation, site security, etc.). Those issues are way more important than any bug I brought up so kudos to you if you can get this house in order.
ThorssonTrump ago
Dudicles ago
Regardless of who fuzzywords is, he or she at one time (along with just about everyone from SBBH at the time) rage quit Voat and helped sabotage a bunch of subs he or she was a mod in by removing other mods, wrecking the CSS's, on top of spam posting everywhere on Voat. That simple fact alone should have meant fuzzy should never be allowed anywhere near anything to do with running or working on Voat.
Considering he or she did (just look at the badges), I think that says a lot about the administrative leanings here. And considering that bringing anything like that up gets you attention from certain users, says another thing.
ThorssonTrump ago
wooot?! i had stopped voating at that point; i missed that! damn. any archives? i'd love to see that tantrum.
it's a he that thinks it's a she, btw. mental health issues, obviously.
Dudicles ago
I don't have any archives, but I did a search on DDG and found this interesting thread.
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/551987
ThorssonTrump ago
nice, i remember that.
fun fact: fuzzywords admited it was @she a while back. also, someone linked to a medium post by @fuzzywords with the same profile pic as the voat account which linked to a blog which didn't have whois protection (real name, address) and from there, one could find out that fuzzywords was openly a: transvestite, autistic, and a militant SJW.
so
TLDR: an autistic tranny SJW was the biggest coder of voat for a whole year - - the same year that all the TSA-reddit level censorship was coded into voat (limits, account restrictions for negatives, downvoat bot tied to voat's api, etc)
it's not gone, just on another account, btw. the same organized paid criminal militant sjw shills own and operate voat on behalf of their kike overlords. :( that's why i've spent the last half year making a new voat that won't be infiltratable like all these other social networks. that part is done. just a few more months of coding out and we ought be deploying :)
stay tuned for all the mountains of salt and tears.