Subverse Rules Feature (Beta 2) (voatdev)

submitted ago by PuttItOut

Subverse rules are a feature Voat is implementing to remove subjectivism from moderator actions such as comment and submission deletions as well as user bans. Currently a moderator simply has to provide a “reason” why they are performing such actions, and seeing that often times this reason is made up on the spot, we are not happy with this. Going forward when a moderator performs such actions they will be required to select a rule violation. This requirement will help to establish the validity of the action.

Rules can be created at a subverse level by a moderator and Voat has some basic global rules, both of which are available as a selection on these moderator action screens as well as all report dialogs (comment/submission reports).

Rules will also be used in all domain and user bans going forward.

This feature is now in beta on the preview site and any testing would be greatly appreciated.

What needs testing:

  1. Subverse Rule creation
  2. Reporting comment and submissions in a subverse (making sure they show up in the v/sub/about/reports page)
  3. Moderator user banning and unbanning (all this code has been changed)
  4. Moderator comment and submission deletions

Test site: https://preview.voat.co/

P.S. The Vote feature is nearly fully implemented on the preview site, meaning you can create them, vote on them, and then manually process them for full lifecycle testing. :)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

freshmeat ago

The fact you and Crensch took that sub over renders anything you say about it meaningless. It's a truth-prison where legitmate posts are removed because of the rules you implemented.

100% of the mods are compromised and likely yours and cresnch's alts so you can still have a public reputation that's not attached to your main.

I can;t prove what you are thinking, that's why we investigate. Due to the actions of the past, nothing you say is credible, and pizzagate is entirely subverted. I notice that the Voat pizzagate community is no where to be found in the larger scene as well so I suppose you have fooled a few people, but most of us have moved on.

Vindicator ago

100% of the mods are compromised and likely yours and cresnch's alts so you can still have a public reputation that's not attached to your main.

You are living in a fantasy. None of the mods in v/pizzagate but me have had much conversation with Crensch or kevdude ever. They were unknown to each other until the past few weeks. They were just regular users. And if you analyze commenting times, you will see that for kev or Crensch to BE millennial_falcon or me, they would have to be online 24/7/365. It's an idiotic claim.

Perhaps why you cannot provide any evidence of this:

It's a truth-prison where legitmate posts are removed because of the rules you implemented.

freshmeat ago

hah, I was wondering who would openly shill like you just did but it seems you are one of the mods in PG.

You are living in a fantasy. None of the mods in v/pizzagate but me have had much conversation with Crensch or kevdude ever.

Proof?

They were unknown to each other until the past few weeks. They were just regular users.

Lmao, yeah kev and crench are just "regular users". I take it you don't venture far from the subversive sub you operate.

And if you analyze commenting times, you will see that for kev or Crensch to BE millennial_falcon or me, they would have to be online 24/7/365. It's an idiotic claim.

It doesn't matter who the exact individual is commenting or posting or censoring, they all have a structured group that follows guidelines, which you are a part of.

Perhaps why you cannot provide any evidence of this:

Looking back at deleted submissions going back over a year would seem to negate your claim. The rules were implemented by redditors, for redditors, to control and subvert the PG community because this is the closest we have ever gotten to ending the freedom pedophiles have online, and that includes the people you protect.

It's why there are 5 pizzagate subverses with split user base. It was intentional.

Just an FYI you cannot stop the impending prosecutions, and in fact putting yourself at the head of it by moderating only implicates you further. Karma is coming hard and quick for you child fuckers.

Vindicator ago

All the smearing, flimsy ad hominem flailing and inability to cite any actual evidence for your claims gives you away. Sad.

freshmeat ago

Yeah everyone is just hallucinating collectively and you are totally innocent.

Vindicator ago

"Everyone"

"Collectively"

Again...no evidence. You should knock off the ganja before trying to debate. It's pathetic.

freshmeat ago

It's a dead thread, but you are right about one point; it should be shown and documented. That is the next post in rPV.

People need to be more aware that PG is compromised here on Voat. Everything aside, you are being defensive and persistent on the topic of pedophiles and guarding them. I know we all have to play the game by the rules here but the fact that this is even a scenario just shows how quickly things are moving. The internet will no longer be safe for you pedophiles soon.

Vindicator ago

Projection, much..."freshmeat"? LMAO

freshmeat ago

LMAO lelelelel

Yes im projecting my thoughts based upon pattern recognition. You sided with pedophiles, you already chose your fate.

think- ago

You sided with pedophiles

How so? I'm curious.

So far everyone who has accused @Vindicator of protecting pedophiles turned out to protect pedophiles.

Not saying you do, but before you go ad hominem like this, you should better be able to prove it.

@Vindicator

think- ago

I'm currently reading your links, thanks.

think- ago

@freshmeat, I won't be able to read everything today, but I will get back to you the day after tomorrow (won't be here tomorrow), and will try to figure out what has caused your concerns.

freshmeat ago

it's not just my own personal concerns. PG is controlled opposition thanks to very users on this website.