Is it really? NR makes a post lying about v/GreatAwakening, and ultimately it's mod @srayzie, indicating it's somehow comped over a mere ping list. A ping list has nothing to do with moderation of the subverse or how the subverse is ran. She created the ping list to get the attention of users who may miss what she feels are important topics.
The proof that said ping list is somehow bad, was because two users had "toast" in their name, but lacked the detail all of the evidence before it had. It was simply a move of "dazzle them with bullshit" in my opinion to convey a lie.
NR's own words in regards to that article is, "I choose my words very carefully." Multiple have no asked him to clear up the outright lie he used, and he refuses to address it other than that statement I just gave.
Just from that alone, he was given multiple opportunities to come clean. If I were to take NR by their word alone, he deliberately sowed doubt and discord with super flimsy evidence. We can only speculate why as he refuses to actually address the issue.
Just recently he made a post on gab about FoT. I know next to nothing about the drama going on there, but I did look at the evidence that was presented for this. The topic is about FoT trying to buy influence.
His evidence is a cropped picture, showing someone else offering FoT influence for a few concessions. FoT comes back with a money related comment - probably a joke, but one can't be sure since all we have is a cropped picture cutting out the rest of the conversation that took place. He uses that cropped picture as evidence someone is trying to buy favor, when in reality that isn't what happened.
If I were to assume that FoT's comment about shekels was infact real and the cropped picture is the entire conversation, it doesn't make what FoT wrote any more nefarious. What you then see is a negotiation between two parties, where "your side" comes to him first, offering said influence.
Just from looking at these two things from NR very recently, it looks very suspect. First it's flimsy evidence that doesn't show anything is compromised, and the second thing is something being taken out of context and twisted to fit a narrative much like the MSM does.
I'm not asking you to like the hyperbole of "lying kike". I'm just asking you to consideration these two actions as of late. If NR is a force for good, why is he purposely lying and then not engaging in further discussion about it when asked?
what on earth are you talking about? i couldn't give a fuck about what you just wrote about, I'm down for NR because he has provided good information on many many many occasions. anything else is noise that is not going to distract me from the final goal. bye.
view the rest of the comments →
rymetymeuk ago
Bullshit
kneo24 ago
Is it really? NR makes a post lying about v/GreatAwakening, and ultimately it's mod @srayzie, indicating it's somehow comped over a mere ping list. A ping list has nothing to do with moderation of the subverse or how the subverse is ran. She created the ping list to get the attention of users who may miss what she feels are important topics.
The proof that said ping list is somehow bad, was because two users had "toast" in their name, but lacked the detail all of the evidence before it had. It was simply a move of "dazzle them with bullshit" in my opinion to convey a lie.
NR's own words in regards to that article is, "I choose my words very carefully." Multiple have no asked him to clear up the outright lie he used, and he refuses to address it other than that statement I just gave.
Just from that alone, he was given multiple opportunities to come clean. If I were to take NR by their word alone, he deliberately sowed doubt and discord with super flimsy evidence. We can only speculate why as he refuses to actually address the issue.
Just recently he made a post on gab about FoT. I know next to nothing about the drama going on there, but I did look at the evidence that was presented for this. The topic is about FoT trying to buy influence.
His evidence is a cropped picture, showing someone else offering FoT influence for a few concessions. FoT comes back with a money related comment - probably a joke, but one can't be sure since all we have is a cropped picture cutting out the rest of the conversation that took place. He uses that cropped picture as evidence someone is trying to buy favor, when in reality that isn't what happened.
If I were to assume that FoT's comment about shekels was infact real and the cropped picture is the entire conversation, it doesn't make what FoT wrote any more nefarious. What you then see is a negotiation between two parties, where "your side" comes to him first, offering said influence.
Just from looking at these two things from NR very recently, it looks very suspect. First it's flimsy evidence that doesn't show anything is compromised, and the second thing is something being taken out of context and twisted to fit a narrative much like the MSM does.
I'm not asking you to like the hyperbole of "lying kike". I'm just asking you to consideration these two actions as of late. If NR is a force for good, why is he purposely lying and then not engaging in further discussion about it when asked?
kneo24 ago
@GoogleStoleMyBike @Crensch, @Kevdude @Trigglypuff @ExpertShitposter
Did I miss anything?
rymetymeuk ago
what on earth are you talking about? i couldn't give a fuck about what you just wrote about, I'm down for NR because he has provided good information on many many many occasions. anything else is noise that is not going to distract me from the final goal. bye.
SandHog ago
Just like Alex Jones!
kneo24 ago
I just gave a summary of what this whole thread is about, Rabbi.