Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
Sure, you're completely right principally speaking. But you have to concede that this is the same group, yet again, that always stirs up trouble for the sake of doing so. SBBH.
They push the limits like this just for fun, like hackers poking software for vulnerabilities. I can't understand why we so frequently entertain the instigators like we do.
Because letting them be the bad guy is the only way they lose. Banning them unfairly only validates everything they rabble rouse about. Letting them speak just lets them annoy a few people and bury themselves in downvotes.
Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
Actually there is nowhere on the site that says @system subs all have to follow the same rules. Aside from that, the user in question was deliberately trying to get banned and caused an over-reaction when she got what she wanted.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
The user was out of order and I doubt that mod even wanted to have to deal with SBBH. Otherwise @Kaydnce would have perm banned them the first time instead of a 24 hour temp ban for spamming memes and low-quality posts and chan memes.
Ignore the fact that the description says "attitude" and consider the context which I laid out in this post. I think the description is bad and SRS is using that to try and pitchfork rally unsuspecting Voaters. The user earned the temp ban, then tried to start drama with the mod. Expert picked a fight she knew she would lose, then went to go cry about it and concern troll everyone into falling for their same routine once again.
That sub had zero issues until SBBH started focusing on it with expert and ProtectVoat a few days ago
espresso_patronum ago
Having the same problem with these individuals on /v/frugal
Mumbleberry ago
Eat shit, censor fag.You slimy soy boy.
Lazmat ago
Do you also enjoy deleting and censoring users?
Mumbleberry ago
Yes, he does;https://voat.co/v/Frugal/modlog/banned
R34p_Th3_Wh0r1w1nd ago
I blocked the gaming subverse today. Ban them all.
voats4goats ago
That's what they want.. block the user not the sub
WhiteRonin ago
My guess is that they just like fucking with you! I doubt the sub has anything to do with your situation.
freshmeat ago
Hi shill.
WhiteRonin ago
Thank you for proving my point.
Seventh_Jim ago
Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
Womb_Raider ago
Sure, you're completely right principally speaking. But you have to concede that this is the same group, yet again, that always stirs up trouble for the sake of doing so. SBBH.
They push the limits like this just for fun, like hackers poking software for vulnerabilities. I can't understand why we so frequently entertain the instigators like we do.
ChillyHellion ago
Because letting them be the bad guy is the only way they lose. Banning them unfairly only validates everything they rabble rouse about. Letting them speak just lets them annoy a few people and bury themselves in downvotes.
WhiteRonin ago
Because we post cool hitler and moronic pics for the fuck of it?
freshmeat ago
Actually there is nowhere on the site that says @system subs all have to follow the same rules. Aside from that, the user in question was deliberately trying to get banned and caused an over-reaction when she got what she wanted.
The user was out of order and I doubt that mod even wanted to have to deal with SBBH. Otherwise @Kaydnce would have perm banned them the first time instead of a 24 hour temp ban for spamming memes and low-quality posts and chan memes.
LurkMoarFaggot ago
Idk, when you're banned for something eddit tier like attitude on a @system sub you're kind of poking the honets nest.
freshmeat ago
Ignore the fact that the description says "attitude" and consider the context which I laid out in this post. I think the description is bad and SRS is using that to try and pitchfork rally unsuspecting Voaters. The user earned the temp ban, then tried to start drama with the mod. Expert picked a fight she knew she would lose, then went to go cry about it and concern troll everyone into falling for their same routine once again.
That sub had zero issues until SBBH started focusing on it with expert and ProtectVoat a few days ago