Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
Actually there is nowhere on the site that says @system subs all have to follow the same rules. Aside from that, the user in question was deliberately trying to get banned and caused an over-reaction when she got what she wanted.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
The user was out of order and I doubt that mod even wanted to have to deal with SBBH. Otherwise @Kaydnce would have perm banned them the first time instead of a 24 hour temp ban for spamming memes and low-quality posts and chan memes.
view the rest of the comments →
Seventh_Jim ago
Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
freshmeat ago
Actually there is nowhere on the site that says @system subs all have to follow the same rules. Aside from that, the user in question was deliberately trying to get banned and caused an over-reaction when she got what she wanted.
The user was out of order and I doubt that mod even wanted to have to deal with SBBH. Otherwise @Kaydnce would have perm banned them the first time instead of a 24 hour temp ban for spamming memes and low-quality posts and chan memes.