Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
Sure, you're completely right principally speaking. But you have to concede that this is the same group, yet again, that always stirs up trouble for the sake of doing so. SBBH.
They push the limits like this just for fun, like hackers poking software for vulnerabilities. I can't understand why we so frequently entertain the instigators like we do.
Because letting them be the bad guy is the only way they lose. Banning them unfairly only validates everything they rabble rouse about. Letting them speak just lets them annoy a few people and bury themselves in downvotes.
view the rest of the comments →
Seventh_Jim ago
Mods of default subs should have to justify censorship much more strongly than non-defaults. The posts in question were gaming related; mocking faggots that are ruining gaming as a hobby is relevant content.
The mod was out of order, and his unverified justification of "talking to a few regulars" is insufficient for the action taken.
Womb_Raider ago
Sure, you're completely right principally speaking. But you have to concede that this is the same group, yet again, that always stirs up trouble for the sake of doing so. SBBH.
They push the limits like this just for fun, like hackers poking software for vulnerabilities. I can't understand why we so frequently entertain the instigators like we do.
ChillyHellion ago
Because letting them be the bad guy is the only way they lose. Banning them unfairly only validates everything they rabble rouse about. Letting them speak just lets them annoy a few people and bury themselves in downvotes.
WhiteRonin ago
Because we post cool hitler and moronic pics for the fuck of it?