Root of Corruption - Part 13: "Eh... what's up, Doc?" | Origin of the enemy. (pizzagatewhatever)

submitted ago by argosciv

Root of Corruption: Index / Table of Contents / Overview

Previous:

ITT: (see Preface)

Definitions:

I'm going to try to avoid shortening things here, continued in 8 comments, sort oldest first.

Preface

Alright folks, this is it... the one you've been waiting for, yada yada.

What I'm going to do, is lay it all out for you on the topic of why Satanism was never to blame, it's all what you do with it, plenty of you will disagree like crazy already, but, if you're willing to read, maybe it won't seem so bat-shit...

Bonus: Yes, this is also the crypto-jew thread.

Bonus 2: O9A, MS-13, ISIS/IS/ISIL et al(Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, etc)

All of that said, I was going to put together a "Map of Fuckery" for this post, a nice lovely visual aid... funnily enough, someone beat me to it with just about everything I had in mind on it & then some. Unfortunately, as expected, a few inaccuracies are present & some details are missing. I'll share it here anyway for your viewing pleasure and so that, if you have questions about anything on it, you can ask them(after you read the entirety of this thread) and I can attempt to share what I know, if anything, about a particular node. I will say though, ask a stupid question, expect a stupid answer...

Disclaimer: There are many things on the following image, which I don't necessarily agree with in terms of wording/implications, but, everything is pretty much right where it needs to be.

"Map 1" (herein referred to as "m1")

There's some things on there that I know nothing about, I will freely admit that right now - my focus is at the top sections primarily; I'll start things off by addressing a couple of the inaccuracies which have been covered(sometimes ad nauseam) in previous Root of Corruption entries.

We'll get the easy stuff out of the way first...

Vlad II Dracul and Vlad III Dracula were not the enemy; Dragon worship is not a product of BANK OF ENGLAND(ca. 1694)/CITY OF LONDON; The Vlads, being members of The Order of the Dragon, fought against the enemy for much of their lives, unfortunately failing and instead having to surrender many a time and resort to peace bargaining:

Yes, that's the easy stuff because I already covered it... if that much reading is too hard, you're in big, big trouble ahead...

So, before I get into the nasty stuff where I explain who the real enemy is and why, we need to address a vital, but, missing detail from m1:

"Shamanism"

Shamanism is about as old as religious/spiritual practice gets, indeed, it is almost certainly older than everything in the green "ET" section of m1 and possibly even older than the implied roots of said section(top-left-most corner).

The wikipedia entry for Shamanism is extensive, I will pull up the relevant pieces here - do not try to have a whinge at me about ritual sacrifice, it's a primitive and outdated practice; any rational person will agree that it is absolutely not necessary in this day and age - whether human or otherwise. Over time, rationally minded persons and civilizations, as they grow, evolve beyond the need for such acts - moreover, when it comes to animal sacrifice, Shamanism displays utmost reverence for the animal and nothing is wasted - nature does the work with the remains.

Can you really say that the tempered and comparatively rare animal sacrifices made by primitive Shamans, are any more grotesque than the amount of slain animals that nobody eats and are otherwise discarded in today's world? Interesting part though, most countries that 'process meat' for mass consumption, do indeed find as many viable uses as possible, for all parts of the animal... they even go to efforts to reduce the animals' suffering, just like the Shamans...

But wait, who is it that won't allow the stunning of say, cattle, before they're to be slain? I thought so...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamanism

Shamanism is a practice that involves a practitioner reaching altered states of consciousness in order to perceive and interact with a spirit world and channel these transcendental energies into this world.[1]

A shaman (/ˈʃɑːmən/ SHAH-men or /ˈʃeɪmən/ SHAY-mən) is someone who is regarded as having access to, and influence in, the world of benevolent and malevolent spirits, who typically enters into a trance state during a ritual, and practices divination and healing.[2] The word "shaman" probably originates from the Tungusic Evenki language of North Asia. According to ethnolinguist Juha Janhunen, "the word is attested in all of the Tungusic idioms" such as Negidal, Lamut, Udehe/Orochi, Nanai, Ilcha, Orok, Manchu and Ulcha, and "nothing seems to contradict the assumption that the meaning 'shaman' also derives from Proto-Tungusic" and may have roots that extend back in time at least two millennia.[3] The term was introduced to the west after Russian forces conquered the shamanistic Khanate of Kazan in 1552.

The term "shamanism" was first applied by Western anthropologists as outside observers of the ancient religion of the Turks and Mongols, as well as those of the neighbouring Tungusic and Samoyedic-speaking peoples. Upon observing more religious traditions across the world, some Western anthropologists began to also use the term in a very broad sense. The term was used to describe unrelated magico-religious practices found within the ethnic religions of other parts of Asia, Africa, Australasia and even completely unrelated parts of the Americas, as they believed these practices to be similar to one another.[4]

Mircea Eliade writes, "A first definition of this complex phenomenon, and perhaps the least hazardous, will be: shamanism = 'technique of religious ecstasy'."[5] Shamanism encompasses the premise that shamans are intermediaries or messengers between the human world and the spirit worlds. Shamans are said to treat ailments/illness by mending the soul. Alleviating traumas affecting the soul/spirit restores the physical body of the individual to balance and wholeness. The shaman also enters supernatural realms or dimensions to obtain solutions to problems afflicting the community. Shamans may visit other worlds/dimensions to bring guidance to misguided souls and to ameliorate illnesses of the human soul caused by foreign elements. The shaman operates primarily within the spiritual world, which in turn affects the human world. The restoration of balance results in the elimination of the ailment.[5]

Beliefs and practices that have been categorised this way as "shamanic" have attracted the interest of scholars from a wide variety of disciplines, including anthropologists, archaeologists, historians, religious studies scholars, philosophers and psychologists. Hundreds of books and academic papers on the subject have been produced, with a peer-reviewed academic journal being devoted to the study of shamanism. In the 20th century, many Westerners involved in the counter-cultural movement have created modern magico-religious practices influenced by their ideas of indigenous religions from across the world, creating what has been termed neoshamanism or the neoshamanic movement.[6] It has affected the development of many neopagan practices, as well as faced a backlash and accusations of cultural appropriation,[7] exploitation and misrepresentation when outside observers have tried to represent cultures they do not belong to.[8][9]

Terminology

Etymology

The earliest known depiction of a Siberian shaman, drawn by the Dutch explorer Nicolaes Witsen, who wrote an account of his travels among Samoyedic- and Tungusic-speaking peoples in 1692. Witsen labelled the illustration as a "Priest of the Devil," giving this figure clawed feet to express what he thought were demonic qualities.[10]

Pause for a moment.

Nicolaes Witsen

Nicolaes Witsen (8 May 1641 – 10 August 1717; modern Dutch: Nicolaas Witsen) was a Dutch statesman who was mayor of Amsterdam thirteen times, between 1682 and 1706. In 1693 he became administrator of the VOC. In 1689 he was extraordinary-ambassador to the English court, and became Fellow of the Royal Society. In his free time he was cartographer, maritime writer, and an authority on shipbuilding. His books on the subject are important sources on Dutch shipbuilding in the 17th century. Furthermore, he was an expert on Russian affairs. He was the first to describe Siberia, the Far East and Central Asia in his study Noord en Oost Tartarye [North and East Tartary].[1]

Nicolaes is worth looking into, but, let's continue for now.

Shamanism: Terminology cont:

The word "shaman" probably originates from the Evenki word "šamán," most likely from the southwestern dialect spoken by the Sym Evenki peoples.[11] The Tungusic term was subsequently adopted by Russians interacting with the indigenous peoples in Siberia. It is found in the memoirs of the exiled Russian churchman Avvakum.[12]

The word was brought to Western Europe in the late 17th century by the Dutch traveler Nicolaes Witsen, who reported his stay and journeys among the Tungusic and Samoyedic-speaking indigenous peoples of Siberia in his book Noord en Oost Tataryen (1692).[13]

~~

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

argosciv ago

(2/8)

Before we can put Nimrod in his place, we need to take a look at "the enemy" of Jews/Israelites;

Amalek

"Amalekites" redirects here. For Amalekites in the Book of Mormon, see Amalekites (Book of Mormon).

Pause for a moment to have a giggle at the fact that Mormons tried to muddy the waters on this one... Amalekites did not fucking build Jerusalem.

Please be sure to read the entirety of the Amalek wiki entry, I'm going to cut to the chase after a brief overview.

Amalek (Hebrew: עֲמָלֵק‬, Modern Amalek, Tiberian ʻĂmālēq) is a nation described in the Old Testament of the Bible. The name "Amalek" can refer to the nation's founder, a grandson of Esau; his descendents, the Amalekites; or the territories of Amalek which they inhabited.

The Old Testament describes the Amalekites as a tribe which lived in ancient Israel and in the land called Moab, in what the Romans called Arabia Petraea (Moab and the desert of Sinai), a region depopulated in the fourteenth century BC and then occupied by Edomites.

According to the Book of Genesis and 1 Chronicles, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz and the concubine Timna. Timna was a Horite and sister of Lotan. Amalek appears in the genealogy of Esau (Gen. 36:12; 1 Chr. 1:36) who was the chief of an Edomite tribe (Gen. 36:16). Amalek is described as the "chief of Amalek" in Genesis 36:16, in which it is surmised that he ruled a clan or territory named after him. In the chant of Balaam at Numbers, 24:20, Amalek was called the 'first of the nations', attesting to high antiquity.[1] Rashi states: "He came before all of them to make war with Israel".[2] First-century Roman-Jewish scholar and historian Flavius Josephus refers to Amalek as a 'bastard' (νόθος) in a derogatory sense.[3]

According to the Old Testament, the Amalekites inhabited the Negev.[4] They are commonly considered to be Amalek's descendants through the genealogy of Esau. This is probably based on the association of this tribal group with the steppe region of ancient Israel and the area of Kadesh (Genesis 14:7). As a people, the Amalekites were identified as a recurrent enemy of the Israelites.[5]

Etymology of Amalek

Amalek may mean "dweller in the valley".[6] In some rabbinical interpretations, Amalek is etymologised as a people am, who lick blood,[7] but most specialists regard the origin to be unknown.[8]

Amalekites in the Hebrew Bible

The Amalekites appear to have lived a nomadic or seminomadic lifestyle along the fringes of southern Canaan's agricultural zone.[9]

In Exodus 17:8-16, Amalek makes war against Israel in the wilderness. Joshua is tasked by Moses to lead Israel in battle, and Moses watches from a hillside. When his hand is raised, Israel prevails, but when it is lowered, Israel falters. So Moses keeps his hand raised the entire battle, even having assistants hold him up, so that the battle will go to Israel.

According to 1 Samuel 30:1-2, the Amalekites invaded the Negev and Ziklag in the Judean/Philistine border area towards the end of the reign of King Saul, burning Ziklag and taking its citizens away into captivity. The future king David led a successful mission against the Amalekites to recover "all that the Amalekites had carried away".[10]

In 2 Samuel 1:5-10, an Amalekite tells David that he found Saul leaning on his spear after the battle of Gilboa and killed him and removed his crown. David has the Amalekite put to death for his action in killing the anointed king.[11]

Exegesis of origins

The Bible portrays the Amalekites as descendants of Amalek, a grandson of Esau,[5] who derive their origins from Edom (Genesis 36:11–12, 15–16). In exegesis of Genesis 14:7, the use of "Amalekites" seems out of place in a passage that concerns the days of Abraham. Bible scholar David Noel Freedman considers the anachronism to be an editorial insertion.[9] Rashi explains that the writer was making a reference to the country which was afterwards inhabited by the Amalekites. C. Knight elaborates this concept by making the comparison: "Caesar went into France" because Gaul was afterward occupied by the Franks, as Gaul is present day France.[12]

Alternatively, during the Islamic Golden Age, certain Arabic writings claimed that the Amalekites existed long before Abraham.[13] Some Muslim historians claimed that the Amalekites who fought Joshua were descendants of the inhabitants of North Africa. Ebn Arabshah purported that Amalek was a descendant of Ham, son of Noah.[12][13] It is, however, possible that the name Amalek may have been given to two different nations. The Arabians mention Imlik, Amalik, or Ameleka among the aborigines of Arabia, the remains of which were mingled with the descendants of Joktan and Adnan and became Mostarabs or Mocarabes, that is, Arabians mixed with foreigners.[12]

By the 19th Century, there was strong support by Western theologians for the idea that the nation of Amalek could have flourished before the time of Abraham. Matthew George Easton advocated that the Amalekites were not descendants of Amalek, by taking the literal approach to Genesis 14:7.[14] However, the modern biblical scholar David Freedman uses textual analysis to glean that the use of Amalekite in Genesis 14:7 is actually an anachronism,[9] a chronological inconsistency of (in this case) a group of people in a misplaced time. Also in the early 19th century, Richard Watson enumerated several speculative reasons for having a "more ancient Amalek" than Abraham.[13]

In the exegesis of Numbers 24:20 concerning Balaam's utterance: "Amalek was the first one of the nations, but his end afterward will be even his perishing", Richard Watson attempts to associate this passage to the "first one of the nations" that developed post-Flood.[13] According to Samuel Cox, the Amalekites were the "first" in their hostility toward the Israelites.[15]

Many nomadic groups from the Arabian desert, apparently including Amalekites, have collectively been termed "Arab(s)". While considerable knowledge about nomadic Arabs have been recovered through archeological research, no specific artifacts or sites have been linked to Amalek with any certainty.[9] However, it is possible that some of the fortified settlements in the Negev highlands and even Tel Masos (near Beer-sheba) have Amalek connections.[16] Easton claims that the Babylonian inscription Sute refers to the Amalekites, as well as the Egyptian term Sittiu. Easton also claims that the Amarna tablets refer to the Amalekites under the general name Khabbatti, or "plunderers".[14]

I hope you have read the entire entry, I'm going to answer a few questions then move on:

Note: Yes, we're entering subjective territory, but, this is due to mistranslations over time including some caused by the literal destruction of information found in ancient cities and even throughout time, caused by book burnings and library destructions, hostile takeovers, war, etc; I am throwing my theory into the mix, in the hopes of bringing an end to the depravity, corruption, lies, manipulation and false accusations, over the ages.

What are Amalekites? Arabs crossed with Israelites... yes, crossbreeding, ie, Amalekites are Arabs and their offspring from raping Israelites; no doubt that Jesuits find their roots in this fuckery, also. Also of no doubt, is that Amalekites engage(d) in child-buggery and 'perfected the technique' of creating mind-slaves(suicide soldiers, information carriers, spies, groomers/handlers(create & 'handle' more mind slaves), propagandists, "crypto-jews", etc)

What is a "crypto-jew"? An Amalekite (or supporter/agent/blackmail/buggery-victim thereof) pretending to be Jewish, while pretending to be of another religion per the requirement of the time, location & agenda; it's a double(sometimes triple)-play.

Are they Satanists? No, they have raped and stolen(metaphorically and literally) from that which we know of today as "Satanism", warping the knowledge(while attempting to redefine it, so as to throw off investigation and/or scapegoat others for their crimes; capitalizing on superstition) and personal tools for their own perverse agenda, spanning the ages - "Satanism" is not the only religion/belief system/culture which has been raped/exploited, they all have - even the ones the Amalekites created...

Rob Zombie - Lords of Salem

Before I move on to discuss Nimrod, I'd like to take a moment to address something important:

You may notice a lot of anger, hatred & call for war/extermination, coming from Judaism, towards Amalekites, mentioned in the wiki entry above - I want you to consider what might be at the root of this attitude and also the age of the writings which called for such extreme reaction. Understand that such rage is exactly what the Amalekites want, they want war perpetuated ad infinitum... consider that... the enemy(Amalekites) does not want to exterminate, they want to enslave and reign supreme.

I personally do not primarily advocate violence as the answer, especially not preemptive violence - however, it's a different world over in the Mid-East theater; I'm in no position to make the tough decisions regarding the most decisive way to end the conflict with minmal loss of life, there are many who are locked into this unending, ancient battle...

In this day and age, though, the battle has spilled into the digital realm; information wars, psy-ops/shilling, civilian investigation, etc - look around at what's happening even right here on voat, over on twitter, you name it...

Maybe there's a way to minimize the amount of people throwing themselves into the meat grinder, if everyone could realize who is churning it for their own perverse amusement/gains?

Rgusraper ago

Are they Satanists?

Biatch don't try to garner sympathy now. Don't give a fuck what you think the definition of Satanism is. Your constant shit stirring is what got you on the shit list, obnoxious prick. We friends now. Got it? How long did you think you could fire shots at people around here and not get some "friends?" May as well keep sucking mod dick now boy.

https://files.catbox.moe/8calzo.gif