@kevdude @Vindicator @VictorSteinerDavion
Post in question
@Millennial_Falcon cited rule 3 for removal, so I'm going to operate as if that's the litmus test here.
All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.
All the title does is list 4 things, one being pizzagate. It insinuates a link, but does not say for sure, or how, or through what new source or info.
Still, possibly acceptable on its own merits if we take the insinuation into account.
EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post
I rest my case.
view the rest of the comments →
ESOTERICshade ago
These links are administrators and board members affiliated with Welcome Trust. The rest of us understood it. The link itself is descriptive. It says what it is. "governance, board, governors, chathamhouse, academy, board."
Rule 3:
We don't think scrapping hours of a person's work is worth it for you to nitpick posts with this much research. This post refers to one of the tops of the food chain at the top of the pyramid. Down from there it spreads out and gets very tedious and complicated. Researchers must be allowed to follow the trails, research, for it to be fully understood. We used to be a crowd sources investigative sub. Now we are a sub that has to attempt to pass Falcon's almost impossible barriers. The diminished crowd speaks for how tired of this people are.
The OP is well known as not being a shill and should be given a little leeway. Its a small sub. If the mod is not familiar with the regular posters by now then the mod is not paying enough attention. Burning off this much time of a good researcher and regular poster is not OK.
You might argue other reasons for people having left and stopped bringing their investigations. This is my opinion and its the one I have.
@swordfish69 @kevdude @vindicator @think- @letsdothis1
Crensch ago
I'm going to respond to you exactly once.
YOU ARE PERSONA NON GRATA. I don't give a SHIT about you, or what you say. In fact, the more you support something, the more likely I am to think the opposite, because every time you show up you are wrong.
twistedmac11 ago
And this is who we have moderating shit? Someone with the temperament of a toddler? Jesus, no wonder Voat is going to shit. You'd think @ESOTERICshade was the mod by the drastic difference in tone. Calm the fuck down.
If you can't deal with some pushback online without having a coronary, maybe you should consider other hobbies. Therapy, perhaps.
Crensch ago
Cool. Show me where I'm wrong, faggot.
twistedmac11 ago
Deflect, deflect, deflect. I'm talking about your temperament, you ignorant fool. Get mad, call names, deflect. Excellent. All actions of a toddler. Smoke a bowl and chill the fuck out. I swear life gets MUCH more enjoyable when you relax.
Crensch ago
Tone-fallacy.
Fuck your feelings. I'm right, you're not. I'm not deflecting shit - your concerns are simply irrelevant.
Degenerate faggot. Using chemicals to change how your mind works.
I'm enjoying the salt here just fine.
Your emotion-based arguments are laughable, and have fuck-all to do with how I run this subverse.
Also, you still can't show me where I'm wrong.
twistedmac11 ago
I rest my case.
Irrelevant to who? You? Sure. The rest of the subverse? No. I know better than to waste my energy arguing with a toddler, though. Your brain simply isn't developed enough to reason with yet.
Crensch ago
Anyone that isn't a walking vagina.
You, and whomever else in the subverse that cannot handle their emotions, are not relevant. You supposedly research child-traffcking and rape, but a guy on the internet gets your panties in a wad?
This post is one of my lowest-voted posts. 1.6 years ago.
All I said was that there's no good reason to believe the Holocaust happened.
So I set out to present my findings about it to Voat. I made a claim, then linked information about it.
Have you seen the front page of Voat?
But MY brain isn't developed. Go cry in a corner, soyboy.