Time for more digging, folks. QAnon started dropping names tonight related to Rachel Chandler, the Epstein sex slave-turned modeling photographer we exposed two years ago. He's urged anons to dig into before (the last time, right before Voat went down for three days last April).
He's made dozens of child trafficking related posts today. You can see them all, here. A couple of notables:
"Ray Chandler = Allison Mack x 100"
"THE STANDARD HOTEL.
RACHEL CHANDLER."
And he dropped a link to a new artist I hadn't heard of:
" http://www.michalchelbin.com/portfolio_in.asp?id=1477&type=100228&sub_title=Strangely_Familiar&langid=1
Connection to Ray Chandler? Are you awake?"
So I did a little digging into Michal Chelbin. She's an Israeli artist who features "art" portrait photography of kids with dead eyes, topless preteens with their fathers in disturbing positions, naked underwater, and groups of topless girls hugging. She says:
"My images are vehicles to address universal themes: family issues, ideas of normality, puberty with its all incumbent pains and distractions, the desire for fame. An example of this is the adolescent girls I photograph, many of them are on the verge of sexual consciousness. They are in this difficult age, torn between innocence and experience. While their bodies might be still that of a child, their gaze sometimes imply differently. I try to create an informal scene, in which they directly confront the viewer. I feel they and their stories represent with most clarity the theme that interests me the most and which is the twilight zone between reality and fantasy. My aim is to record a scene where there is a mixture of direct information and enigmas and in which there are visual contrasts between young and old, large and small, normal and abnormal. My playground lies between the private and the public, between fiction and documentary. For me, the image is just the tip of the iceberg; it’s the gate to a story waiting to be told and which I try to depict in an appealing yet troubling way."
QAnon then dropped the link to the FBI tip line, like he did last year.
I'm not getting the connection between Chelbin and Rachel Chandler, though, other than they are both creepy female photographers with pedo-appeal photography.
While I was Google image searching Chelbin, Google offered up another "art" photographer doing "similar" work, Sally Mann. NSFW -- fully naked preteens. The second photo in the "Family Color" series is a little girl on a couch, naked, with claw marks on her stomach, titled "Dog Scratches." https://archive.fo/z2K05
(NSFW) Mann is apparently a famous America photographer roundly criticized for her naked kid photography, including a kid in a ditch, as well as her book of corpse photography.
The exhibition was divided into five sections that "visually depict[ed] the eternal cycle of life, death, and regeneration."[5]
Mann was inspired to produce the photographs in the book by her reactions to several different events. The first of these was the death of her father; later events that inspired her interest in death were the shooting of a prison escapee on the grounds of her Lexington, Virginia, farm and the death of her pet greyhound, Eva.[2] Mann arranged for Eva's skin to be preserved by tanning and buried her body in a cage in order to prevent the remains from being carried off by wild animals. She later dug up the cage and photographed the dog's skeletal remains.[2][6] A series of photos documenting Eva's decomposition is included in the book.[1][7]
Despite the fact that some critics found the images off-putting, Mann expressed surprise that the book did not garner the controversy of her previous books which featured nude photos of her young children. While giving the book a favourable review, Blake Morrison expressed his surprise that no one had questioned her right to publish photographs of the dead when there had been extensive protests over her images of her children.[2]
Nothing to see, there!?
Anyone care to dig more? I'm short on time at the moment. Neither of these artists came up in a SearchVoat of our archives.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
Chelbin's photos seem to depict many Eastern European children / teenagers. A possibility would be that she takes pics, and someone in the US decides which of the children depicted will be trafficked.
(mere speculation of course)
Chandler runs a modeling agency = many of her models look like trafficking victims. There are many established lines of trafficking from Eastern Europe to the US, partly via Mexico / South America (remember Epstein).
Vindicator ago
Makes me wonder how much Melania knows.
think- ago
You can be sure that she knows a couple of things. Makes me wonder how she felt when they socialized with Epstein.
It was not only obvious that he was into girls, 'many of them are on the younger side', it seems to have been obvious too that he got girls from Eastern countries, and kept them at his NY town house. I recall reading that someone thought it was totally weird that so many girls from Eastern Europe were at this parties (the kind of parties Prince Andrew attended).
Vindicator ago
Melania socialized with Epstein? Links?
think- ago
Err....@Vindicator? There are photos of Epstein with Trump and Melania. You have seen them. Melania's phone number is in his little black book (IIRC), together with lots of phone numbers of Trump and the Mar-a-Lago staff. Since he was a Mar-A-Lago member.
Do you want me to do a post with photos of the occasions when Trump and Melania were photographed with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell?
Vindicator ago
Sure. I've never seen them. I'm assuming that was after it came out that he was trafficking kids?
think- ago
That was during the time when Trump said Epstein was a 'terrific guy' and acknowledged that many of Epstein's women 'are on the younger side'. :-)
Vindicator ago
So, long before the girl's mom went to the police and people found out he was a pedo.
think- ago
LOL.
IIRC, Epstein's mansion is quite close to Mar-a-Lago. The mansion where he got massages from girls every day several times a day, and raped some of them.
Epstein was a member of Mar-A-Lago.
He and Ghislaine Maxwell felt so safe there, they even groomed one of Trump's towel girls.
Trump said many of Epstein's women were 'on the younger side'.
I think he didn't mean Ghislaine Maxwell when he was saying that. /s
Imo, Trump knew perfectly well what Epstein did.
Trump might not be sophisticated, but he isn't an idiot. He would have been a bad club owner and businessman, if he hadn't known about Epstein's activities.
Do you think he never heard about the 'Lolita Express'?
kestrel9 ago
That's why he kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago. https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2016/04/jeffrey-epstein-sex-slave-lawyer-donald-trump-accusations/ and yes I'm familiar with the Jane Doe lawsuit scam against Trump that turned out to be funded by a huge Bush supporter.
Wouldn't it be easier to start a 'Trump is a Pedo' sub instead of stomping all over people trying to do research? /s
think- ago
Excuse me, it wasn't me who brought up Melania and what she possibly knew.
That was @Vindicator.
I never mentioned that lawsuit here. In fact, I told @Vindicator either in a public comment or in a PM (not sure) that I read the witness statement, and don't believe that the accusations are legit.
Next time you might just want to ask me what I think about specific allegations against Trump.
Nothing I posted on this thread wasn't connected to the OP. The only thing I am sorry about is that I self-censored myself for too long, and didn't dare to write anything that doesn't seem to be regarded as mainstream on this sub. That was clearly a mistake.
But we all learn from mistakes, so that will never happen again. :-)
kestrel9 ago
Why would you censor yourself, unleash it by all means. You think Trump is a complicit part of pedophile Epstein's grooming of young girls, you think Melania is implicit in it and you make snarky remarks about Ivanka having worked for Balazs (which btw, I did find the answer to your question, the truth is not so convicting and presumptive of some kind of guilt as your comment implied) and FWIW, Balazs said he didn't know Trump that well (2017 interview).
There's updates to one of the links you posted, but you're not interested in the real implications you make in light of what logic dictates, so why bother. Summary: In light of the updated info, you're squarely on the same side as Eric Holder, Adam Schiff and Obama. Go figure.
think- ago
No. I said Trump and Melania were socializing with Trump, that's all. I even explained that the reason why Epstein had Melania's phone number in his book was that he was a member of Mar-a-Lago.
Well, would you have a link where you point that out?
Yes, I know. Where did I talk about Trump and Balazs?
Well, if you want to hold against me that I didn't post these updates (I'm not aware of), it might be good to post them.
No, I can't 'figure', because you don't link to the updates.
And if you want to hold against me that I come to the same conclusions as other people about some topics or people or events: I don't care. I'm non-partisan. Sometimes I'm of the same opinon as the writer of a globalist news outlet (I still read The Guardian everyday, sometimes I'm of the same opinion as some ultra-conservatives.