You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

I seem to have made a wrong turn. I was trying to get to v/Pizzagate, but it looks as though I've stumbled into v/SoapOpera instead.

Oh, wait.

to distract you all and cause burnout on the mod team

Crensch ago

So, no defense of Gothamgirl? Just an attack on the outing of a liar and word-salad poster that certain other well-liked and respected users here seem to have an affinity for?

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

I've barely had any major interactions with GothamGirl to make a comment on anything about her or if she likes to bed married men or even if FlynnL1ve5 is in the middle of a divorce and looking for a night cap. The entire thing seems wierd as fuck to me that this is even in this sub. Although, this has given me the idea to start a dating site for Q believers. It would be a great way to avoid dating libs...

Crensch ago

As an aside, how would you suggest we deal with these usernames?

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Honestly, I don't have any idea. Just ignore them and hope other genuine members catch on? Even IRL, you can warn someone that so and so is a bitch or asshole, but you usually end up looking like the bad guy, and just have to wait for the person you tried to warn to learn the hard way that you were telling the truth and only trying to help them.

Crensch ago

But on a forum I can link people to this irrefutable evidence of her lying over and over, and then her submissions being horseshit, and her being activated at Jem777's "death".

Forums have their downsides, but easily proving your claims is not one of them. Anytime someone thinks you're the asshole, "Sure, maybe so, here's the link to my evidence, so feel free to prove me wrong!" AAAAND that's all she wrote.

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

If that's what you want to do, go ahead, but it's going to eat up all your time because there's a troll army on the horizon.

Crensch ago

Yep, and they'll be easier to deal with if nobody speaks up on my sticky. Any aged accounts with low contributions or new accounts that post shit against the mods can get a nice pretty flair as being a likely troll/shill army grunt.

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Flairing anyone who disagrees with a mod is wading into treacherous territory. This is still a free speech zone and leaders should be able to be questioned and criticized in a mature manner and respond in kind. Unless of course someone is being especially abusive for no good reason.

Crensch ago

Flairing anyone who disagrees with a mod is wading into treacherous territory.

False accusations is what I meant. Especially the criminal ones.

This is still a free speech zone and leaders should be able to be questioned and criticized in a mature manner and respond in kind. Unless of course someone is being especially abusive for no good reason.

Sorry, worded incorrectly.

I am ALL FOR legitimate criticisms of mods and other users. By all means, bring it on. It's this GG-tier shit that I am beyond sick of already, because it's nothing but wild accusations and manufactured consensus by sock-puppet accounts, both new and aged.

There's a reason I'm in the center of this shitstorm, and it's because I do not do the day-to-day modding. In fact, if things are going well, I stay away as much as possible to avoid bias when and if a legitimate complaint on one of the mods comes up.

I need to watch my words, thank you very much for calling me out on not being specific enough there in a way that others could use against me. I hope you don't mind, I'll be editing it.

Enigmatic_Continuum ago

Hey, that's cool. No worries!