Ark of Hope is advertising that they are supported by Tracy Beanz, Hagmann Report and others:
https://twitter.com/AbusedKids
wtf is going on??
WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
If you're referring to the pinned tweet, it's not the video of Ark of Hope. It's a video made by No Restrictions Entertainment, and the trio listed, of which Ark of Hope supported the creation of.
Honey Bee Melissa is retweeting Ark of Hope in clear support (29 July);
Ark of Hope's pinned tweet may be for a movie, but they are clearly associating themselves with:
(a) Tracy Beanz;
(b) Hagmann Report;
(c) Asian American Hotel Owners Association;
(d) SGT Report
thereby implying that they are supported by the above people and organisations.
Hi @Piscina, could you please edit your post and add a link to Honeybee_'s tweet of July 29?
Also, could you explain in a sentence or two in which way Tracy Beanz and the Hagman Report support Ark of Hope or Ark of Hope supported the creation of the video, and who did it?
Thank you! :-)
I will give you our 24 hours Grace flair, so that you'll have time to edit, per Rule 2 (Empiricism).
OP is making numerous claims he's linked no evidence of, and when I challenged him on them, he made no edits. Instead, he repeated his claims. His argument consists of saying there is no evidence this is not a fake charity, but not actually providing any evidence that it is illegitimate.
If he doesn't provide the evidence for all of his claims within 24 hours of your flair, this needs to be reflaired Potential Disinfo and pulled for Rule 2.
He claims to be just asking questions to give Honeybee_ a chance to explain
No reason to really explain any more than that.
@Piscina, I suggest you take the rules and the mods seriously here, because if you choose not to, you'd better hope your posts and arguments are airtight. If they're not, I'll dismantle you and everything you've posted here in a way that makes you regret making your account.
I trust my mods to ping me when necessary, but I do not like being pinged.
Since I'm feeling EXTREMELY charitable right now, I'll give you a small dose of what you'll find in response to far more of your content than you would ever imagine.
You wrote:
Despite all your claims, there is not one shred of evidence that points to ArkofHope is a charity.
It is NOT on ANYONE ELSE to prove that ArkofHope is a charity. It is on YOU to prove that it is NOT. YOU are the one making the claim, and attempting to push the burden of proof onto someone else to prove the opposite is dishonest and shows AT BEST a level of stupidity that suggests you can't actually help anyone here, and at worst, that you're a disinfo shill.
This is me being extremely nice. Now get your shit together and stop causing a headache for my mods.
view the rest of the comments →
Piscina ago
Ark of Hope is advertising that they are supported by Tracy Beanz, Hagmann Report and others: https://twitter.com/AbusedKids wtf is going on?? WAKE UP PEOPLE!!
risewithoutfear ago
If you're referring to the pinned tweet, it's not the video of Ark of Hope. It's a video made by No Restrictions Entertainment, and the trio listed, of which Ark of Hope supported the creation of.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16kwmpCpjipGdGCayY825nT9rgzH5xr86/view
Piscina ago
I am talking about the fact that:
Honey Bee Melissa is retweeting Ark of Hope in clear support (29 July);
Ark of Hope's pinned tweet may be for a movie, but they are clearly associating themselves with: (a) Tracy Beanz; (b) Hagmann Report; (c) Asian American Hotel Owners Association; (d) SGT Report
thereby implying that they are supported by the above people and organisations.
think- ago
Hi @Piscina, could you please edit your post and add a link to Honeybee_'s tweet of July 29?
Also, could you explain in a sentence or two in which way Tracy Beanz and the Hagman Report support Ark of Hope or Ark of Hope supported the creation of the video, and who did it?
Thank you! :-)
I will give you our 24 hours Grace flair, so that you'll have time to edit, per Rule 2 (Empiricism).
Vindicator ago
OP is making numerous claims he's linked no evidence of, and when I challenged him on them, he made no edits. Instead, he repeated his claims. His argument consists of saying there is no evidence this is not a fake charity, but not actually providing any evidence that it is illegitimate.
He claims to be just asking questions to give Honeybee_ a chance to explain (without ever actually proving anything NEEDS to be explained), but then when she replies and points out that he completely mischaracterized a post on the charity web page, he deepens the attack.
Not that he didn't make his intentions clear at the very beginning.
If he doesn't provide the evidence for all of his claims within 24 hours of your flair, this needs to be reflaired Potential Disinfo and pulled for Rule 2.
Crensch ago
No reason to really explain any more than that.
@Piscina, I suggest you take the rules and the mods seriously here, because if you choose not to, you'd better hope your posts and arguments are airtight. If they're not, I'll dismantle you and everything you've posted here in a way that makes you regret making your account.
I trust my mods to ping me when necessary, but I do not like being pinged.
Since I'm feeling EXTREMELY charitable right now, I'll give you a small dose of what you'll find in response to far more of your content than you would ever imagine.
You wrote:
It is NOT on ANYONE ELSE to prove that ArkofHope is a charity. It is on YOU to prove that it is NOT. YOU are the one making the claim, and attempting to push the burden of proof onto someone else to prove the opposite is dishonest and shows AT BEST a level of stupidity that suggests you can't actually help anyone here, and at worst, that you're a disinfo shill.
This is me being extremely nice. Now get your shit together and stop causing a headache for my mods.
@think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @Honeybee_