You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Honeybee_ ago

The article by Corbett about the "child love group" was an article AGAINST the ban being lifted in the Netherlands, not for it. https://goodmenproject.com/good-feed-blog/dutch-courts-lift-ban-on-child-love-group/

And Strongbow, where's the reference for him using Blackhorn333?

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

Can you give us a PDF to an FBI criminal complaint form? I really want to get PG evidence to them asap.

think- ago

Yes, he asks to support an initiative to re-ban the pedo group. So this in fact is a counter-argument against @Piscina's claim that they are pedos.

I understand why @Piscina got triggered by the Ark of Hope NGO, and think it's good to looked into them, like we did with so many other anti-child trafficking organizations. It seems that Ark of Hope provides info, and offers chat rooms for survivors of abuse. This might be shady, since it offers the opportunity to collect money without in fact doing any real work apart from setting up a website and put some info about sexual abuse on it.

However, I don't see any proof that they are a pedo group, and while they might be a fake charity, this also would need to be proved. It's good to look into them, but more research should be done before before claiming

perhaps signal to other pedos that they are in the same business

Re the 'notinmyworld' site: Yesterday they showed a pic of two white rabbits when I accessed the site - this pic is gone now, instead it shows two eagles with a chick. (Strange.)

Considering they also show an owl on their main page, this organization should be researched.

TL;DR: I think it would be good to look into 'notinmyworld'. What I don't understand is why @Piscina didn't give @Honeybee_ the benefit of the doubt before questioning her motives in public, and even doing a post about her.

Why not wait until Honeybee_ would have replied to Piscina's Twitter message beore doing a post here?

Why instantly assume bad intentions?

@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall

Piscina ago

I have been @ing HB for days on twitter. No response until yesterday with a rude ad hom attack. She has an attitude of 'us and them' which in itself is distutbing.

TrishaUK ago

Well said @think-

think- ago

Thanks, Trisha.

TrishaUK ago

OMGoodness, has anyone watched this talk for Pro-Paedophiles? Their agenda seems to make us 'normal people' feel bad if we exclude or judge them because they are 'born like that and cannot help it' - so sick of this push to normalise child abuse. They state Paedophilia is NOT the same as Child Abuse? ------- **TED Conference by Mirjam Heine (ff 6:20 mins) The Paedophile Agenda - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8p5ijTfdPM** (though this Pastor makes a lot of sense so whole video is worth watching) @Honeybee_ @think- @Vindicator @Podge512 @Carmencita

As of January 2018, over 2600 TED talks had been posted.[16] Every week 5-7 new talks are published. In January 2009, the then number of videos had been viewed 50 million times. In June 2011, the number of views totaled 500 million,[56] and on November 13, 2012, TED reached its billionth video view.[18] Chris Anderson in an interview in March 2012: A snippeT about TED is scary, so far as the amount of people they 'reach' spreading this crap.
It used to be 800 people getting together once a year; now it's about a million people a day watching TED Talks online. When we first put up a few of the talks as an experiment, we got such impassioned responses that we decided to flip the organization on its head and think of ourselves not so much as a conference but as "ideas worth spreading," building a big website around it. The conference is still the engine, but the website is the amplifier that takes the ideas to the world. - from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TED_(conference)

carmencita ago

I have read about the TED push pedo normalizing their sick agenda before. Only real dummies will believe it which is what worries me. We have far too many dummies now. Dunces.