The Elpida Home for Refugees: The Rockefeller Connection

1-3 – Recap/Previous Posts

4-6 – This Post

1) This all started a few months ago with a video by Jamie Dlux in which he shares some research he had found on Dan Schneider and other Hollywood perverts. Most of you probably already knew about Schneider's past and were shocked when you saw the @dillonthehacker clip in which Schneider is said to have “cauterized a star of David onto the forhead of babies,” and “sold Miranda Cosgrove into slavery!” If you found yourself watching all of the videos on Schneider's websites, you may have come across this one that not only contains, but draws focus to, a boy-love symbol. (There's a video about this on my YouTube channel and previous post on this.)

2) There's a mind-map connecting all the Hollywood abuse scandals to Viacom and Paramount. In it, you will notice that Clinton Inc. is connected to several of them. It is starting to seem like the Clinton's are actually more entrenched in this community than many have previously thought. Here's a video (and previous post) summarizing the links between the Clintons, Frank Giustra, 3 of the original investors in Digital Entertainment Network (DEN), Alphy Hoffman, and possibly Dan “Radcliffe” Schneider himself. Giustra's Radcliffe Foundation is what led to the (re)discovery of the Elpida home.

3) You may have seen this picture of Amed khan and Frank Giustra in front of a triangular boy-love symbol on a glass door. That is one of the doors at the Elpida Home. Here's a post about Khan's background with links to lots of images and video showing the inside of the home. The images don't contain any red flags per se, but some aspects of them are worth questioning given what is really being investigating here. Here's a video and post about that too.

4) And finally, we come to the subject of this post and video. Two people who worked on the ground at Elpida are co-founder Amed Khan and project manager Mike Zuckerman. Khan is a former employee of the '92 and '96 Clinton/Gore campaigns before getting involved in the International Rescue Committee. Zuckerman is a self-described cultural hacker that works to re-imagine urban spaces in order make them more organized and efficient. He is a member of the Institute for the Future. Both the International Rescue Committee and the Institute for the Future partner with the Rockefeller Foundation and have members (Katharine Farley and Berit Ashla, respectively) who are tied to other Rockefeller interests (Rockefeller University and Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisers, respectively). I also linked Institute for the Future partner, Humana, to Doug Band, another one of Bill Clinton's close associates. Band and Clinton used Band's company Teneo to help sell America's interests via Hillary's State Department. When you consider Khan and Zuckerman's ties to Rockefeller interests, along with those concerning the Clinton/Giustra/Band alliance, you begin to realize something that is getting close to the truth: that wealthy families really are setting up foundations, charitable missions, and refugee camps around the very people that were displaced by the wars they had a hand in starting*. Not only that, they now expect that these charitable endeavors, aught to be profitable so they don't have to donate to them year after year!

5) Why do the wealthiest and most prominent philanthropists need to turn a profit on their foundation or charity? There are many different types of philanthropic work that needs to be done in the world. Some people donate their money to research, or to saving wild, and in these cases, it would not be that unreasonable for a person to desire a profit from funds invested. However, the fact that the Rockefeller's, the Clinton's, and the Giustra's of the world are looking to profit from helping the refuges of war that they helped cause seems downright evil.

6) Is this it? Is this how elite pedophiles, who supposedly run the world, procure their victims? Are these humanitarian organizations being used as front for something truly sinister, such as human trafficking? Or is this exactly what it seems to be; honest philanthropy aimed at financial sustainability? Am I looking too far into the people and the symbols and the coincidences? I don't know how easy or hard it would be to find any reports of wrongdoing at Elpida, but at this point, I can't tell if I am more anxious that I'll find it or that I won't. I think this means it's time to start fresh with a new topic altogether.