Welcome to the third part of my series on HighLevelInsider. I will get to the clickbaity headline and it is totally legit, I promise. But you may want to read Part 1 and Part 2 first.
Why did I invest a year trying to investigate HighLevelInsider and his boss, David Brock? Because what they do is inherently very risky and high-stakes. They represent a unique point of vulnerability in the whole corrupt CIA/FBI/NSA/State/Congress mess.
There are something like 17,000 people working at the CIA, 70,000 at NSA, and so on. It's pretty scary to imagine trying to outwit all of them. But as I explained in Part 2, the totally justified lack of trust within the Clinton machine imposes limits on how the disinfo campaign is run. Way too much has to pass through David Brock, or one shadowy person working for Brock. So now you're trying to outwit two people instead of tens of thousands. And this isn't a technical problem, like breaking into a server. It's social engineering. Brock has repeatedly shown bad judgment in regard to boyfriends, he takes psych meds, he's a paranoid mess. Since Trump was nominated, they've both been running flat out. They hold all the key secrets of the pedosadist regime in their trembling, overworked hands. This is where the Deep State is at its absolute weakest. So this is where I focused.
Yesterday, HLI started trying to counter me by using a couple of old alt accounts. They slid Part 2 a little bit, costing it some views. I confronted him (scroll down), and he deleted several threads (here and here) to try and cover his tracks. He's very unhappy about this. He's going to get unhappier still.
This brings us to Obama. Once you identify who is pushing the fake news, and sort through all the varieties of it, you can start to read off the real motives and issues. HLI has left an enormous paper trail, filled with pages of detailed insights, which he now cannot take back. So, do you want to know the truth about Obama? Start with the fact that HLI's main goal is usually negative. He just wants to prevent one particular idea from taking hold (the truth), so sheer confusion will do just fine.
One of the tragedies of the past decade has been that the U.S. government has been badly split on its foreign policy. On the one side, Hillary Clinton has pursued a scarily hawkish line of regime change. Meanwhile, Obama was pursuing a dovish policy of concessions to Iran in exchange for delaying (not stopping) its nuclear arms program. Now, it doesn't really matter if you are a hawk or a dove: Surely the worst possible outcome for America is for two completely corrupt and mutually hostile cliques to drive foreign policy in opposite directions.
The question we want to answer today is: Given that Hillary and Obama have always hated one another and were battling desperately for dominance, why would David Brock instruct HighLevelInsider to tell wild stories about Obama, like him being the "real" Osama Bin Laden? Or raised by the CIA from birth? Exactly how does that benefit Hillary, more than simple silence on the subject?
Keep in mind that the actual blackmail is like a nuclear deterrent. You can't really use it to motivate people to do specific things. Hillary has dirt on Obama, and vice versa, and the career civil service guys in NSA/CIA/FBI have the dirt on everyone, but no one can make it all public.
A subtle benefit of the Obama = Osama story is that it makes Obama seem mysterious and powerful, rather than paralyzed by hostile factions and thwarted in foreign policy. It points away from Hillary and their conflict. It also implicates Obama in events long before his actual rise to power, like 9/11. It creates multiple levels of confusion, entangling Obama with the Bushes and the Saudis when he has no particular connection to either one, and Hillary has plenty. With a little more effort, it can then be extended to entangle him with, say, Mossad, the Rothschilds, or the Bilderbergers. And it burns up attention span that might otherwise be used on much more immediate questions, like how Obama managed to buy five multi-million-dollar houses on his modest Presidential salary. Who paid for those? Well, who paid for Bernie Sanders' new house?
Brock and HLI are aware of these side benefits when they craft their memes. However, they are all secondary to the unbreakable rule of not drawing useful attention to elite pedophilia. HLI will be happy if you speculate about whether Joan Rivers was assassinated for saying Michelle is a tranny. Or if you think that the Queen of England controls Obama using MK Ultra. You can talk about his being secretly Muslim, or born in Kenya, all day long so far as Brock is concerned. The "birther" thing was started by Hillary in the 2008 primary, well before Trump used it. But Hillary has never attacked Obama on sex.
He was almost certainly molested by his mentor as a boy, and later, as a state senator in Chicago, hung out in gay bars getting serviced by older men. At least two of those men, Donald Young and Larry Bland, were murdered to keep them quiet. Jerome Corsi has covered this in detail, as have others. You can watch Larry Sinclair tell his story here.
Many of you already know this story. However, look at it again from HLI's point of view. He has said, over and over, that the blackmail rings control pretty much everyone in Washington. He's exaggerating, and we'll get back to why he does that. It isn't everyone, and it isn't such a good method of control. Bribery and threats are more common. But it would help his role-playing immensely to tell this story. If his only goal was for /pol/ to believe that he really belongs to "Three," and really has a cure for cancer, he'd start with it. Oh my God, even Obama is blackmailed over pedophilia! FBI Anon said Corsi was a good source. Yet HLI never mentions him, and instead tells you an insanely stupid lie that Obama = Osama, because THIS story is the one that is actually true.
This has been a comparatively simple example of turning HLI's misdirection techniques against him. I hope you found it helpful.
Tomorrow: Alefantis tries threats, and when that doesn't work, HLI throws a tantrum.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
1) Ummm...Did anyone ever consider that Osama and Obama were brothers?
2) I concur with your profile on Brock. Spot on. The one thing omitted was "likely suicidal tendencies or inclination".
3) WTF does this have to do with PG? C'mon....conform to the rules or die ; )
SoberSecondThought ago
Oh, this is as PG-related as possible. For the past 15 months, folks have been chasing after Podesta, Brock, and Alefantis. What I am saying is that this guy, HLI, is equal to them in status, and guilty (under RICO laws) of all the same crimes. He has been meeting with them, probably eating meals with them, and the rest of the time spending all day, every day, on /pol/, /v/pizzagate, Reddit, YouTube, and everywhere citizen investigators gather. He has hundreds of alts, and probably a notebook filled with all their passwords that he guards very carefully. He is like a silent partner in the enterprise. This is a big step forward in the investigation, proving that he exists and explaining what he does. And there is more to come.
I know this argument is complicated. That's why I broke it into pieces, and I'm delivering it at a slow pace to let people digest it. Today's argument is not really about Obama. I don't care about Obama. But he makes a good introductory example for how HLI does his work. He has an assigned script. He can say certain things, and he has to be silent on certain things. He pushes us toward safe subjects, and away from unsafe ones.
As a rule, if he says something about Obama, it can only be (a) a lie designed to confuse you and waste your time, or (b) something true but of no interest to Brock or Hillary. For example, I don't know who Obama's real father is. It could be his mentor Frank, who molested him. It could be someone else. I would imagine that HLI/Brock/Hillary are unsure of the truth on this as well. Jerome Corsi has probably done the best job of anyone on this, and he says he doesn't know.
What matters is that despite careful reading of HLI, and Senate Anon, and other alts of his that I have not yet unmasked, I have found no reference to Obama's very tangled sex life. That's not an accident. It is part of a pattern.
We're going to be doing a lot of this kind of pattern analysis in coming days, and what we find is going to be REALLY damaging. But obviously it won't work if people can't keep up, or if I don't tell the story well. So I humbly ask that everyone bring up whatever isn't clear. Thanks.
ababcb ago
SoberSecondThought ago
Nope. Go place them! Seriously, you might catch him talking to HLI. Or yelling at him, more likely.