A Few Clarifications of the Submission Rules (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Millennial_Falcon

Other important stickies:

Fully Sourced Executive Summary of Pizzagate Evidence

Seth Rich: Building a Case

Please Subscribe to /v/SethRich!

Update on the State of Voat from PuttItOut (please donate to Voat)

Hi all! We have made some minor clarifications and amendments to the submission rules. These changes include:

  • Language from the community-developed definition of Pizzagate has been included directly in the wording of Rule 1.

  • We have also included a link with examples of posts that do or do not pass Rule 1

  • Rule 2 now includes what was formerly a part of Rule 4 (all posts need at least one link)

  • The disabling of "share a link" posts (you can still post a link as a discussion post). The reason for disabling this option is to encourage good descriptions (i.e. attention to Rule 3), which often are not possible with the character limit for titles.

  • Clarification of Rule 3 to state that a good title must establish direct relevance to pizzagate.

  • Amendment of Rule 3 to require descriptions of unembedded links in posts. (It is much easier for users to make sense of a post if you tell us the significance of your links.)

  • Rule 4 has been made much more clear. (It isn't really a rule, so much as it is directing where to post certain posts that don't pass Rule 1). It also specifies that memes and sourced activism/publicity posts are now allowed.

  • Rule 5 (no standalone memes) has been axed, and rule 6 (NSFW posts must be labeled) has taken its place. Standalone memes are now allowed, so long as they support the investigation.

Let us know what you think about these changes!

Best,

The Mod Team

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gambler_joe ago

pizza gate is a drug smuggling ring and you guys deleted my post all the chans ban me for my post twitter ban for my post facebook ban me for my post.

Millennial_Falcon ago

If you think pizzagate is connected to drug smuggling, you need to make a post and explain. No direct connection to drug smuggling has been established.

gambler_joe ago

MAKE A POST SO IT CAN GET DELETED AGAIN

VictorSteinerDavion ago

Then apply more effort to explaining your case and joining the dots in a clear and legible manner to the community.

Making a claim is not evidence by itself and what makes sense to you may not make sense to anyone else.
The issue with domain knowlege is it's sometimes hard to communicate to people outside your domain of specialty.

I don't doubt for a second that drugs are involved, but is it what's actually happening, and ultimately is it more important than the trafficking of children?
This sub is dedicated to the trafficking, use and abuse of children by those in power, considering drugs being highly likely involved it's probably a valuable avenue of investigation.
One you can contribute to, if you apply effort to frame the context in the manner of children trafficking and abuse.