You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Makingspace1 ago

Here is HIS sentence: "A good example of this, was David Seaman. Due to the anti-Semitic nature and close associations to the alt-right, a good way to discredit him is link his investigation with Zionism. It worked as intended and he fell out of the public eye." He is clearly associating Seaman as being anti-semitic and associated with the alt right which is why he says he was paid to "discredit" him by linking him to Zionism. This is a bullshit sentence that gives his cover away.

SpikyAube ago

How could Seaman be both anti-semitic AND linked with Zionism? Clearly 'anti-semitic/alt right' was referring to the perception of most of the PG investigators, as in, becuase they think everyone in this sub is anti-semitic and alt-right they think they will all buy into/be outraged at, the idea that Seaman is a Zionist.