Last night, a user posted a highly-upvoted post on /v/pizzagate attacking David Seaman. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1650713
Seaman posted this response about two hours ago: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1651763
I removed it because there was no verification it was him (so the post violated rule 4). I asked him to repost with some kind of verification it's him. He reposted, but it looked like the same post with no verification (he mentioned a tweet at the beginning this time, but no link, so in my impatience, I didn't notice the mention). So I removed and again asked for verification.
Seaman then tweeted this: https://twitter.com/d_seaman/status/832293244532830208
He included an image of a Voat message (which seems to have never been sent, because presumably he was implying he sent this message to me, since I was the one who removed his post, yet I never received such a message). The only way I was alerted to his tweets about the Voat post was through another Voat user's comment.
In the "message" he imaged in this tweet, he complains that I'm asking for "personally identifying info." LOL. You're a public figure; all we needed was typical AMA-type verification (a photo of yourself holding something with today's date, "Voat", etc). Anyway, the tweet was sufficient verification, so I pinged him and told him he can repost and I won't delete. Yet he still has not reposted (?). Is he trying to set us up as looking unfair to him?
He also complained about us allowing the post that had attacked him. That post satisfied our posting rules. This community is anti-censorship. Again, feel free to repost your post with the same account (@David_Seaman). Please link one of your tweets about the post in the post itself, so other mods will not mistakenly remove it.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I guess the short answer, after reviewing the comments posted below, is NO, David is not "smearing" Voat. He is sharing some facts about what happened here. Most of the community agrees that MF is the one giving Voat a bad name.
cantsleepawink ago
Can you provide the data for your informed statement ?
V____Z ago
"After reviewing the comments" means that my comment stems from my read of all the comments from the community made prior to mine. Go read them.
cantsleepawink ago
Stats aren't your strong point then. ok...
V____Z ago
But straw men are yours. Got it.
cantsleepawink ago
What is it the kids say ? Whatever.....
Neinerr ago
He deleted human abedin ties with terrorist organizations, before the clinton dump
cantsleepawink ago
What ?? Who do you mean ?
Neinerr ago
I am the guy who bring dyncorp to the light! I am the Freed0mfighter, the researcher banned because speaking against the censorship here! Yes, Falcon have deleted my post with the alias Thisisgameover regarding the ties of Huma Abedin with terrorist organizations, so the only way I could bring the information to light it was with the clinton foundation dump