Many here will remember this controversial thread, https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1472300 which exposed a deeply infiltrated shill in our midst. Not only did the thread end up getting deleted, but the archived pages as well: https://archive.is/rVyim :
Tony Podesta | Facebook https://archive.is/RySHI :
Page Not Found | Facebook https://archive.is/4nxUo :
Chilling eating a cucumber from the garden. - Oliver Friendly | Facebook https://archive.is/FMSvJ :
David Halperin - A new generation of leadership.... | Facebook https://archive.is/SBxIp :
These pages were from the Facebook accounts of Tony Podesta and his friends. They contained some very suspicious images and comments about children and babies, which had been compared to the content of the Comet Instagram in their outrageousness. It is important that everyone here is aware that archive.is is vulnerable in this way.
I have checked the NSFW box as I anticipate someone will repost some of the pictures that were deleted in the comment section.
view the rest of the comments →
tjarco ago
This is such a weird post for various reasons
*1. Why is it labelled NSFW? There is no gore or nudity in any of these pictures, it's just babies and our creepy bias make us believe there is something, but there is nothing NSFW
*2. this same content was posted on v/pizzagatewhatever 3 days ago, mods encouraged to post here. https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/1561690
*3. three days ago I re-archived the last David Halperin link and commented that on original thread, the re-archive it's still up http://archive.is/F1fOe.
*4. first link to Tony Podesta facebook leads to a guy named Nicolas Friendly, wtf is this? Is this person related to anyone PG?
*5 second link, if you open archive and open original source it shows this picture https://i.sli.mg/BLpj31.png who is Oliver Friendly and is he related to PG?
*6 3rd link - chilling eating cucumber is actually being found when following second link - 3rd link is another David Halperin link, again who is David Halperin and why is he connected..
In conclusion this is such a weird mess of a post, I suspect disinfo or maybe (going full conspiracy here) this is to discredit archive.is - archive some personal FB pics, file claim yourself, make it look like archive.is is scrubbing) Considered the fact that all original pages are still accesible, or have been rerouted in which case I ask @Alpo are the links still showing the things you tried to archive?
Mods should not encourage this to be posted here as connections with PG are very unsubstantiated!
EDIT: the discussion between Alpo & me below clear up a lot of these questions!
Alpo ago
I will try to address the points you have raised.
I explained why it was labelled NSFW in the post. I thought it likely that someone would post the photo of the toddler with the cucumber in the comments here, and that is not something that anyone would be likely to want to be seen looking at while at work.
I originally thought to post this content in the main pizzagate section, but feared it would be deleted due to not following the strictly adhered to rules, so I posted in in /v/pizzagatewhatever. The response there, including your own response and a suggestion from a moderator, compelled me to repost it here, following the moderator's recommendations.
The fact that your re-archiving of said page is still existent doesn't tell us much as of now. It may disappear today; it may remain up permanently. It's very likely that the party that had the original archive pages deleted was unaware of your re-archiving of it, or has not had time to take the appropriate legal action yet.
I don't know the answer to this - I just know the archived page was deleted. I was not the person who originally posted this content. I have now placed the part that came from someone else in quotation marks.
Same as above
There is no question mark at the end of your sentence, and the points you are bringing up go into the area of what caused the original post (which was deleted) to be controversial. This is a big part of why I posted this in /v/pizzagatewhatever first instead of here.
Please don't blame me for following a moderator's recommendation, and for wanting the community at large to be aware of the vulnerabilities of archive.is. If this post is deemed inappropriate by the multitude of moderators here, I am willing to accept their judgement.
pepe16 ago
Smart people know that archive.is responds to DMCA requests -- that's why it's always a good idea to download any interesting archive. That's an important message and if people don't know this in general -- spread it.