On/around Oct. 30, 2016, three things happened:
- The FBI Records Vault Twitter went crazy, after it had been dormant for a year, and posted about 20 different tweets about Trump, the Clintons, FBI procedures, left behind agents in occupied territory, deputizing new FBI agents, and so on.
All of these Tweets are still online, which is mind boggling to me, because I would have expected Comey/McCabe to remove them:
https://twitter.com/fbirecordsvault?lang=en
-
On CNN, an insider announced a massive Clinton Foundation investigation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiy7BFnubps
-
On the Wall Street Journal, an anonymous FBI insider (again, I'm guessing another/same retired FBI assistant director) announced a massive, year long, five-office investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
This is the source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957
Here's my question to you:
Where is the Reddit thread that explained, in detail, what the FBI Twitter tweets were about? There was a massive, extremely helpful thread on Reddit (The_Donald, I believe) that went tweet by tweet by tweet, explaining what the tweets were about. It spelled out an entire narrative about how Donald Trump was basically deputized by the FBI, as a kind of left behind agent in occupied territory, to bring justice against the Clinton Foundation.
I can no longer find that Reddit thread on google. If you have a copy of it, know the name of it, know where the cache is, etc., I will be very grateful. I think it will be important in trying to understand what is going on within the FBI over the next 20 days.
My working theory is that intelligence people, within the FBI and elsewhere, worked with Wikileaks to leak the Podesta emails. They were planning on an even-more-massive leak (stage 3), and it was called off at the last minute. This stage 3 leak would have gone into child trafficking, Madeleine McCann, and similar things. They aborted this last leak, probably because their internal figures showed that Trump would win the election (and they could dump the leak if he lost). Nevertheless, they did not abort the revelations about the Clinton Foundation investation. All of these events happened on/around October 30: the FBI twitter account goes crazy, an FBI director announces it on CNN, and the Wall St. Journal announces it (the next day I believe). They wanted to leak enough to make sure that HRC did not become President, but they didn't want to leak so much that it caused mass protests, or civil war, like in South Korea.
party1981 ago
Thank you!
Searcher88 ago
I thought the same. I believe there were some deals made and that's why they didn't release the 3rd dump. A little more patience is needed, we have to see what develops after the inauguration.
party1981 ago
Yes I agree.
tudda ago
Steve Pieczenik had a few videos he put out between nov1st and nov 4th. Essentially, the intelligence community staged a counter coup against Clinton and whether she won the election or not, they intended on removing her from power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM
It would also explain why the Intelligence community (outside from Brennan and Clapper) have refused to comment on the Russian hacking stuff, and many ex intelligence officials have come out to dispute the claims that it was Russians, and Wikileaks has had numerous people state that it was a leak and not a hack.
party1981 ago
Yes, I consider Pieczenik to basically be data point number 4 (FBI Twitter, CNN, Wall St. Journal, Pieczenik).
jml1201 ago
Thanks for this...commenting because I want to come back to this.
4thDaGrymReaper ago
Back then I thought it was the reverse order as what was in the Reddit thread you linked to. If we have to find the smoking gun, if they don't already have it, even without the FBIs resources, I think we are at a loss. We can request more info through FOIA, although we have to be very specific about a topic though, and not be so autistic and spam the form by the thousands. I think we are here to find in groups more than what they can find, like by our number of participants, or to push the narrative that this shit is true and need as much attention as we can help with..
Edit: Fixed Formatting
party1981 ago
This is a great reply.
I just gave George Webb a summary of the evidence. We will see what he says.
rippingtheveil ago
real good work, I'm glad I saw this, for this to be exposed will be a blessing com God #savethechildren
srayzie ago
That's really interesting. Why would that Reddit page have a picture of Trump smiling while he eats pizza on the right side?
party1981 ago
That is a good question.
Electionfraud ago
I also agree with this theory. It does seem that the 3rd nuke was imminent. However, I think the election was thrown to Trump. With all party's agreeing to the terms. Remember the tweet that stated '...drop out within 24 hours or else...'. How could the polls be so off? The 3 rd nuke is going to be released. The keys were hacked. I think waiting for after inaugration day.
party1981 ago
Yes. My working theory is:
I could be wrong about all of that. Smart people like Engdahl disagree with me. We will see.
Azagthoth ago
Does Engdahl have any threads or theories you could share? he could be in this very thread but maybe I missed his name
party1981 ago
He has many videos and podcast interviews on youtube. He independently confirms a lot of George Webb's research and conclusions about Hillary Clinton using ISIS to topple countries like Libya and Syria for oil and plunder.
party1981 ago
He has done tons of videos and podcast interviews on YouTube. I recommend watching 1-3. He basically independently confirms a lot of what George Webb says about hillary using ISIS to take over Libya and Syria for oil and plunder. He says that Huma Abedin is clearly some kind of agent or supporter of the Muslim brotherhood. He believes there is basically an emerging new world order that wants to rule the entire globe under fascism and totalitarianism.
LostandFound ago
Don't forget the wiener emails broke two days prior and it was a shit storm by the 30th .perhaps those inside really thought the dam was about to break.
wellington33 ago
i thinks pizzagate its pretty easy to understand: there's people inside cia/fbi/nsa that knows about it and want to help, but all those organizations are compromised. That's why they leaked it so it could turns into a public investigation. I want to believe that there are good people inside.
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
There are definitely good people inside. I've read a few books by ex-dea, cia, fbi, the authors seemed like patriotic, idealistic, able people who wanted to make the world a better place, and wanted America to be the nation who pulled the world out of its strife, only to find out their masters were capitalising on the strife to get rich and maintain power. They often talked of vendettas launched against them when they complained or tried to change things.
party1981 ago
I completely agree.
doubletake ago
You Folks are Awesome. I get my mind blown everyday when I look at this page. The investigative skills and the motivations of the posters -- just awesome. When this happened I heard that Comey had also been staring at a pile of resignations sitting on his desk. It is a great hope that the rank and file of the FBI and LE in general have had enough of this abomination.
srayzie ago
I'm so impressed by people investigating this too. It's like a bunch of private investigators digging at once. Some of these people trip me out. They know how to dig!
NeedPolyGF ago
Someone should teach members how to investigate efficiently. Or is there already a video or something that does so?
IsThisGameOfThrones ago
Pick one subject that seems spicy and dig the fuck in. I've found very important things that haven't been uncovered just by picking one thing and obsessing over it for a week or so. These people are so sloppy it seems that something always pops up. Don't try to cover everything, just one thing and dig like crazy
party1981 ago
This is such a great point.
This is really data point number 4.
FWI, the first time I heard about Pieczenik, I thought he was crazy because he said that 9/11 was an inside job. Now I think that 9/11 was probably Mossad/CIA/Clinton/Bush/Soros.
tudda ago
Same here. He's said Sandy hook was a false flag as well. Me and my friends thought he was a nut job. We've ALL changed our minds about him now. If this is a troll/misinfo campaign, it's a damn successful one because it's completely changed my perception of the world
party1981 ago
When I first heard about him, I thought he was a nut job. I was following Wikileaks, Podestas, and pizzagate.
He is adamant that 9/11 was some kind of inside job. Now I think he was probably right about all of it. Sent me down a big fucking rabbit hole of sloppy sniper, MK Ultra, nano-thermite, WTC 7 demolition, etc.
tudda ago
I also did a lot of research on 9/11 after this all started happening.
NRUN65 on youtube has an amazing documentary that lays out the case, and then asks questions which the debunkers have so far refused to answer.
While there are many varying degrees of claims regarding the 9/11 conspiracy, from "the official story is not 100% correct" to "9/11 was an inside job and bush knew and helped cover it up".. At the bare minimum, I don't think anyone can watch all those and not at LEAST agree that the officially story is incorrect.
party1981 ago
Just reading the missing 29 pages of the 9/11 commission report will give a reasonable reader the strong impression that Saudi intelligence was involved.
The problem is that, if you dig far enough, you start to realize that Mossad may have been involved as well. Mossad agents were caught in Hollywood, Florida monitoring 9/11 hijackers, and were caught celebrity with cameras on 9/11. FBIanon said that 9/11 was Mossad. Steve Pieczenik said 9/11 was some kind of inside job.
This is not a conspiracy theory that I ever wanted to believe in.
I find the evidence for demolition of building 7 and widespread nanothermite residue to be highly compelling.
followthedolla ago
look in to the DC capitol hill renovations. being done by the same company that rigged the WTC's. im so goddamn afraid that theyll pull something biblical on inauguration day, like blowing up the whole capitol dome along with everyone in a 5 mile radius.
party1981 ago
Webb is worried that they will try to assassinate Trump, perhaps with La Raza shooting Stinger missiles at his plane.
I have no idea. It is so terrifying that I try to just ignore it and hope and pray.
The most reassuring sign is that Trump must be well informed, and he seems very happy and calm. We'll see.
ZalesMcMuffin ago
It probably was. It damn sure wasn't as simple as OBL, in the cave, with the boxcutters.
Fatsack ago
Someone oughta take things into their own hands and assassinate McGabe and Comey
NeedPolyGF ago
Only a satanist leaning person would suggest such things, like assassination.
Fatsack ago
So every person in history ever who ever contemplated murder worships Lucifer in their spare time? Good logic.
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Inciting murder? Isn't that, y'know, illegal n stuff?
Fatsack ago
It's not inciting if nothing happens. And as far as linking that action to my random internet comment, I'll take a jury trial. If they actually considered me a threat though, it wouldn't be processed through the legal system anyhow, they'd just assassinate me first. That's the kind of people they are.
party1981 ago
I don't want the NSA to put me in Gitmo, but I actually find myself weirdly attracted to this idea.
Fatsack ago
NSA is on our side bruv. Who do you think obtained and released all of this to wikileaks.
party1981 ago
I'm not sure. Wouldn't be surprised if it was some kind of Snowden inside of NSA.
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
Theres likely a minority in the NSA on our side, but the leadership is chosen by those in power, and anyone who wants to get anywhere in the NSA must prove themselves.
Orange_Circle ago
Some of the good FBI went up against the evil FBI.
party1981 ago
Exactly
Solver2 ago
They claimed that there was information released via a freedom of information act action and the date they were to be released having been reached.
party1981 ago
Yeah, the explanation doesn't really make sense. First, if it was a backlog, we would expect random information. Instead, we have a sequence of ~20 tweets that are all related to Clinton, Trump, investigations, and getting new FBI agents. Second, CNN and Wall St. Journal announced FBI investigation onto the Clinton Foundation on the same day.
MolochHunter ago
I don't know the link you're looking for, but the conjecture i've heard which seems credible is that when Comey announced he was dropping the 'investigation' he was only referring to one of something like 17 separate investigations into Clinton and the Foundation. The twitterspam is alleged to have come from a rogue FBI agent who wasnt confidant how the internal FBI war would play out and their message was to instruct the public to do the investigation and raise the awareness.
As ive said all along, the good faction of the FBI doesnt have the political cover to make arrests, it needs the public to make enough of a furore to make a lack of arrests utterly untenable
My strong suggestion to the FBI is to arrest Mark Taylor, CEO of the NYT who covered up Jimmy Saville's crimes for 3 decades. HIS arrest will do more damage to the fake news propaganda device than anything else. Because otherwise the media is so in the clinton camp that just to arrest clinton/podesta will be made to seem like the fbi has become 'politicised', and an unfortunately large part of the GP will swallow it
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Mark Thompson, not Taylor. http://www.nytco.com/executives/mark-thompson/
And what would the charge(s) be? Fox News already won the lawsuit to make clear that the media lying isn't illegal, so that's out.
MolochHunter ago
i stand korrected. Im assuming between American and UK intelligence they have evidence of Thompson's participation in this ring (notwithstanding the report to the British parliament that a massive cache of saville-related evidence was destroyed).
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Well, yeah, if they've got THAT on him, then by all means. Should have been done already.
MolochHunter ago
already? The FBI can only recommend cases to the DOJ - who has at least 3 heads implicated as potential paedophile mafia. No justice can come of the FBI moving at this juncture
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Aye, there's the rub.
Who washes the washmen?
party1981 ago
This is a great comment.
I found the link - a great VOAT digger posted it here - and I put it in the original thread.
I agree with you analysis on the good FBI versus the bad FBI.
There are actually 100 different ways to blow this investigation wide open. The best would be to find smoking gun evidence that the Podestas were at Freud's house on May 3, 2007.
grlldcheese ago
Forgot about this myself. Thank you for reminding me.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5aqvr4/this_is_the_secret_of_the_fbi_tweets_this_is_what/
This theory is pure insanity. But it's the only one so far that explains EVERYTHING from the inter agency tensions to the time traveler feats of Twitter shit talk.
MolochHunter ago
thats such an awesome post except whats going on with the first few memes in it suggesting epstein & bill were undercover agents ? wtf?
pessimisticsteel ago
The CIA had them and many more on their side.
Read kathy obrians "TRANCEformation of America".
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
Such a fucking good post.
party1981 ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
I just sent this to George Webb. He will provide answers.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
Edit your post and link the reddit thread within
party1981 ago
I did this, thank you!
Baluga ago
Yes that post existed. It seemed to prove the original FBI anon was a true poster. FBI released Tesla files, and those files mentioned FBI investigator Fred Trump, Don's uncle. The tweets were supposedly all FOIA suddenly working, and seemed to suggest FBI investigators had their hands tied but they were able to respond and act on public information, even when they couldn't pursue covert investigation.
draegspir ago
Do you know if there have been any results from those FOIA requests? I was following that and people said they were pooling money together on /r/the_donald to make them (if I recall, they were like $1k per request). They were making requests for pretty much about anything major and minor they could think of.
afterbernerthrowaway ago
I haven't seen any follow-up on the FOIA requests that came out of that thread, though I do know people were structuring their requests to include language essentially asking for the fee to be waived because the request was for the greater public interest.
Baluga ago
I do not know.
derram ago
https://archive.is/kMbvL :
https://archive.is/xb3N0 :
This has been an automated message.
party1981 ago
George Webb answered my question on Youtube with his explanation:
No disrespect, but I don't think even polling people are very good at polling. I think the explanation is simple. Hillary wanted to take the fight to Comey, and Comey reminded her of the Marc Rich file and released it to the vault. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/us/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-anthony-weiner.html?_r=0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTNPN0snwEU (first two comments)
farmmama10 ago
I am definitely keeping my eye on this thread. Great reminder!