On/around Oct. 30, 2016, three things happened:
- The FBI Records Vault Twitter went crazy, after it had been dormant for a year, and posted about 20 different tweets about Trump, the Clintons, FBI procedures, left behind agents in occupied territory, deputizing new FBI agents, and so on.
All of these Tweets are still online, which is mind boggling to me, because I would have expected Comey/McCabe to remove them:
https://twitter.com/fbirecordsvault?lang=en
-
On CNN, an insider announced a massive Clinton Foundation investigation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiy7BFnubps
-
On the Wall Street Journal, an anonymous FBI insider (again, I'm guessing another/same retired FBI assistant director) announced a massive, year long, five-office investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
This is the source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957
Here's my question to you:
Where is the Reddit thread that explained, in detail, what the FBI Twitter tweets were about? There was a massive, extremely helpful thread on Reddit (The_Donald, I believe) that went tweet by tweet by tweet, explaining what the tweets were about. It spelled out an entire narrative about how Donald Trump was basically deputized by the FBI, as a kind of left behind agent in occupied territory, to bring justice against the Clinton Foundation.
I can no longer find that Reddit thread on google. If you have a copy of it, know the name of it, know where the cache is, etc., I will be very grateful. I think it will be important in trying to understand what is going on within the FBI over the next 20 days.
My working theory is that intelligence people, within the FBI and elsewhere, worked with Wikileaks to leak the Podesta emails. They were planning on an even-more-massive leak (stage 3), and it was called off at the last minute. This stage 3 leak would have gone into child trafficking, Madeleine McCann, and similar things. They aborted this last leak, probably because their internal figures showed that Trump would win the election (and they could dump the leak if he lost). Nevertheless, they did not abort the revelations about the Clinton Foundation investation. All of these events happened on/around October 30: the FBI twitter account goes crazy, an FBI director announces it on CNN, and the Wall St. Journal announces it (the next day I believe). They wanted to leak enough to make sure that HRC did not become President, but they didn't want to leak so much that it caused mass protests, or civil war, like in South Korea.
view the rest of the comments →
Electionfraud ago
I also agree with this theory. It does seem that the 3rd nuke was imminent. However, I think the election was thrown to Trump. With all party's agreeing to the terms. Remember the tweet that stated '...drop out within 24 hours or else...'. How could the polls be so off? The 3 rd nuke is going to be released. The keys were hacked. I think waiting for after inaugration day.
party1981 ago
Yes. My working theory is:
I could be wrong about all of that. Smart people like Engdahl disagree with me. We will see.
Azagthoth ago
Does Engdahl have any threads or theories you could share? he could be in this very thread but maybe I missed his name
party1981 ago
He has many videos and podcast interviews on youtube. He independently confirms a lot of George Webb's research and conclusions about Hillary Clinton using ISIS to topple countries like Libya and Syria for oil and plunder.