On/around Oct. 30, 2016, three things happened:
- The FBI Records Vault Twitter went crazy, after it had been dormant for a year, and posted about 20 different tweets about Trump, the Clintons, FBI procedures, left behind agents in occupied territory, deputizing new FBI agents, and so on.
All of these Tweets are still online, which is mind boggling to me, because I would have expected Comey/McCabe to remove them:
https://twitter.com/fbirecordsvault?lang=en
-
On CNN, an insider announced a massive Clinton Foundation investigation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiy7BFnubps
-
On the Wall Street Journal, an anonymous FBI insider (again, I'm guessing another/same retired FBI assistant director) announced a massive, year long, five-office investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
This is the source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957
Here's my question to you:
Where is the Reddit thread that explained, in detail, what the FBI Twitter tweets were about? There was a massive, extremely helpful thread on Reddit (The_Donald, I believe) that went tweet by tweet by tweet, explaining what the tweets were about. It spelled out an entire narrative about how Donald Trump was basically deputized by the FBI, as a kind of left behind agent in occupied territory, to bring justice against the Clinton Foundation.
I can no longer find that Reddit thread on google. If you have a copy of it, know the name of it, know where the cache is, etc., I will be very grateful. I think it will be important in trying to understand what is going on within the FBI over the next 20 days.
My working theory is that intelligence people, within the FBI and elsewhere, worked with Wikileaks to leak the Podesta emails. They were planning on an even-more-massive leak (stage 3), and it was called off at the last minute. This stage 3 leak would have gone into child trafficking, Madeleine McCann, and similar things. They aborted this last leak, probably because their internal figures showed that Trump would win the election (and they could dump the leak if he lost). Nevertheless, they did not abort the revelations about the Clinton Foundation investation. All of these events happened on/around October 30: the FBI twitter account goes crazy, an FBI director announces it on CNN, and the Wall St. Journal announces it (the next day I believe). They wanted to leak enough to make sure that HRC did not become President, but they didn't want to leak so much that it caused mass protests, or civil war, like in South Korea.
view the rest of the comments →
MolochHunter ago
I don't know the link you're looking for, but the conjecture i've heard which seems credible is that when Comey announced he was dropping the 'investigation' he was only referring to one of something like 17 separate investigations into Clinton and the Foundation. The twitterspam is alleged to have come from a rogue FBI agent who wasnt confidant how the internal FBI war would play out and their message was to instruct the public to do the investigation and raise the awareness.
As ive said all along, the good faction of the FBI doesnt have the political cover to make arrests, it needs the public to make enough of a furore to make a lack of arrests utterly untenable
My strong suggestion to the FBI is to arrest Mark Taylor, CEO of the NYT who covered up Jimmy Saville's crimes for 3 decades. HIS arrest will do more damage to the fake news propaganda device than anything else. Because otherwise the media is so in the clinton camp that just to arrest clinton/podesta will be made to seem like the fbi has become 'politicised', and an unfortunately large part of the GP will swallow it
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Mark Thompson, not Taylor. http://www.nytco.com/executives/mark-thompson/
And what would the charge(s) be? Fox News already won the lawsuit to make clear that the media lying isn't illegal, so that's out.
MolochHunter ago
i stand korrected. Im assuming between American and UK intelligence they have evidence of Thompson's participation in this ring (notwithstanding the report to the British parliament that a massive cache of saville-related evidence was destroyed).
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Well, yeah, if they've got THAT on him, then by all means. Should have been done already.
MolochHunter ago
already? The FBI can only recommend cases to the DOJ - who has at least 3 heads implicated as potential paedophile mafia. No justice can come of the FBI moving at this juncture
ZalesMcMuffin ago
Aye, there's the rub.
Who washes the washmen?