On/around Oct. 30, 2016, three things happened:
- The FBI Records Vault Twitter went crazy, after it had been dormant for a year, and posted about 20 different tweets about Trump, the Clintons, FBI procedures, left behind agents in occupied territory, deputizing new FBI agents, and so on.
All of these Tweets are still online, which is mind boggling to me, because I would have expected Comey/McCabe to remove them:
https://twitter.com/fbirecordsvault?lang=en
-
On CNN, an insider announced a massive Clinton Foundation investigation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiy7BFnubps
-
On the Wall Street Journal, an anonymous FBI insider (again, I'm guessing another/same retired FBI assistant director) announced a massive, year long, five-office investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
This is the source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957
Here's my question to you:
Where is the Reddit thread that explained, in detail, what the FBI Twitter tweets were about? There was a massive, extremely helpful thread on Reddit (The_Donald, I believe) that went tweet by tweet by tweet, explaining what the tweets were about. It spelled out an entire narrative about how Donald Trump was basically deputized by the FBI, as a kind of left behind agent in occupied territory, to bring justice against the Clinton Foundation.
I can no longer find that Reddit thread on google. If you have a copy of it, know the name of it, know where the cache is, etc., I will be very grateful. I think it will be important in trying to understand what is going on within the FBI over the next 20 days.
My working theory is that intelligence people, within the FBI and elsewhere, worked with Wikileaks to leak the Podesta emails. They were planning on an even-more-massive leak (stage 3), and it was called off at the last minute. This stage 3 leak would have gone into child trafficking, Madeleine McCann, and similar things. They aborted this last leak, probably because their internal figures showed that Trump would win the election (and they could dump the leak if he lost). Nevertheless, they did not abort the revelations about the Clinton Foundation investation. All of these events happened on/around October 30: the FBI twitter account goes crazy, an FBI director announces it on CNN, and the Wall St. Journal announces it (the next day I believe). They wanted to leak enough to make sure that HRC did not become President, but they didn't want to leak so much that it caused mass protests, or civil war, like in South Korea.
view the rest of the comments →
tudda ago
Steve Pieczenik had a few videos he put out between nov1st and nov 4th. Essentially, the intelligence community staged a counter coup against Clinton and whether she won the election or not, they intended on removing her from power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov5kvWSz5LM
It would also explain why the Intelligence community (outside from Brennan and Clapper) have refused to comment on the Russian hacking stuff, and many ex intelligence officials have come out to dispute the claims that it was Russians, and Wikileaks has had numerous people state that it was a leak and not a hack.
party1981 ago
Yes, I consider Pieczenik to basically be data point number 4 (FBI Twitter, CNN, Wall St. Journal, Pieczenik).