What Happened With the FBI on October 30? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by party1981

On/around Oct. 30, 2016, three things happened:

  1. The FBI Records Vault Twitter went crazy, after it had been dormant for a year, and posted about 20 different tweets about Trump, the Clintons, FBI procedures, left behind agents in occupied territory, deputizing new FBI agents, and so on.

All of these Tweets are still online, which is mind boggling to me, because I would have expected Comey/McCabe to remove them:

https://twitter.com/fbirecordsvault?lang=en

  1. On CNN, an insider announced a massive Clinton Foundation investigation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiy7BFnubps

  2. On the Wall Street Journal, an anonymous FBI insider (again, I'm guessing another/same retired FBI assistant director) announced a massive, year long, five-office investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

This is the source: http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957

Here's my question to you:

Where is the Reddit thread that explained, in detail, what the FBI Twitter tweets were about? There was a massive, extremely helpful thread on Reddit (The_Donald, I believe) that went tweet by tweet by tweet, explaining what the tweets were about. It spelled out an entire narrative about how Donald Trump was basically deputized by the FBI, as a kind of left behind agent in occupied territory, to bring justice against the Clinton Foundation.

I can no longer find that Reddit thread on google. If you have a copy of it, know the name of it, know where the cache is, etc., I will be very grateful. I think it will be important in trying to understand what is going on within the FBI over the next 20 days.

My working theory is that intelligence people, within the FBI and elsewhere, worked with Wikileaks to leak the Podesta emails. They were planning on an even-more-massive leak (stage 3), and it was called off at the last minute. This stage 3 leak would have gone into child trafficking, Madeleine McCann, and similar things. They aborted this last leak, probably because their internal figures showed that Trump would win the election (and they could dump the leak if he lost). Nevertheless, they did not abort the revelations about the Clinton Foundation investation. All of these events happened on/around October 30: the FBI twitter account goes crazy, an FBI director announces it on CNN, and the Wall St. Journal announces it (the next day I believe). They wanted to leak enough to make sure that HRC did not become President, but they didn't want to leak so much that it caused mass protests, or civil war, like in South Korea.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

party1981 ago

This is such a great point.

This is really data point number 4.

  1. FBI Twitter goes crazy
  2. CNN announces massive FBI Clinton Foundation investigation
  3. Wall St. Journal announces massive FBI Clinton Foundation investigation
  4. Steve Pieczenik, with a White House resume a mile long, announces that there was a Clinton coup and counter-coup.

FWI, the first time I heard about Pieczenik, I thought he was crazy because he said that 9/11 was an inside job. Now I think that 9/11 was probably Mossad/CIA/Clinton/Bush/Soros.

tudda ago

Same here. He's said Sandy hook was a false flag as well. Me and my friends thought he was a nut job. We've ALL changed our minds about him now. If this is a troll/misinfo campaign, it's a damn successful one because it's completely changed my perception of the world

party1981 ago

When I first heard about him, I thought he was a nut job. I was following Wikileaks, Podestas, and pizzagate.

He is adamant that 9/11 was some kind of inside job. Now I think he was probably right about all of it. Sent me down a big fucking rabbit hole of sloppy sniper, MK Ultra, nano-thermite, WTC 7 demolition, etc.

tudda ago

I also did a lot of research on 9/11 after this all started happening.

NRUN65 on youtube has an amazing documentary that lays out the case, and then asks questions which the debunkers have so far refused to answer.

While there are many varying degrees of claims regarding the 9/11 conspiracy, from "the official story is not 100% correct" to "9/11 was an inside job and bush knew and helped cover it up".. At the bare minimum, I don't think anyone can watch all those and not at LEAST agree that the officially story is incorrect.

party1981 ago

Just reading the missing 29 pages of the 9/11 commission report will give a reasonable reader the strong impression that Saudi intelligence was involved.

The problem is that, if you dig far enough, you start to realize that Mossad may have been involved as well. Mossad agents were caught in Hollywood, Florida monitoring 9/11 hijackers, and were caught celebrity with cameras on 9/11. FBIanon said that 9/11 was Mossad. Steve Pieczenik said 9/11 was some kind of inside job.

This is not a conspiracy theory that I ever wanted to believe in.

I find the evidence for demolition of building 7 and widespread nanothermite residue to be highly compelling.