Further to my previous comment, remember that the children said that they were taken to McDonald's Headquarters ? .....

Apart from the Pizza Express which sits right next to 47 HOLLYCROFT AVENUE MANAGEMENT LTD, just opposite on the other side of the road, there is the largest London McDonalds franchise at 108/110 Notting Hill Gate . ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Athul Patak runs 29 franchises through his Appt Corporation and is also very involved with all sorts of charity work. This self made man was even awarded an OBE by the Queen in June 2015.

Mr. Pathak likes to get involved with politics too. According to this parliamant document REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS (pdf) he has donated to Mike Freer, Finchley MP and to Michelle Donelan, Chippenham.

So I had to have a look, didn't I ?

I came across this forum post which listed the names of MPs that had voted against a whistleblower's bill and Mike Freer was one of those MPs.

There are almost certainly others who are keeping quiet because they are being blackmailed or threatened. These are the people that badly need to come forward while they still can.

Anybody who blows the whistle on this should certainly be granted immunity from prosecution under the official secrets act. This proposal was suggested by Labour MP, John Mann. It was defeated in the house of commons 295 to 233.

John Mann was the MP that handed over a file to Scotland Yard about a VIP Paedophile ring and has been campaigning for an inquiry.

The Westminster child abuse ‘coverup’: how much did MPs know?

But the public was told No change in law needed to protect child abuse whistleblowers, says Tory ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Michelle Donelan is the other MP that Pathak donated to.

And she is affiliated with a most intriguing story ..the 'Tatler Tory' scandal involving David Cameron's Conservative Party.

Further reading here:

• Elliott Johnson: the young Tory destroyed by the party he loved

• Tory suicide victim Elliott Johnson ‘was in gay relationship’ with alleged bully

• Tory women blow the whistle on sex pest election guru under investigation for bullying aide who committed suicide

• The Mark Clarke scandal has exposed the class divide at the heart of the Conservative party

Ms. Donelan is now suffering from ill health Conservative MP Michelle Donelan diagnosed with Lyme disease after conversation with constituent

I just found a very odd piece of information on Ella's first husband Will Draper. He is a banker that was responsible for bringing Ella to the UK and for introducing her to Ricky Dearman after they divorced. Well, his full name is James William Draper and so I did a search under that name. http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=61402871&privcapId=24373022 . So he is always working for big investment banks.

And then I find that he was at one point also a director of a smaller outfit called : 47 HOLLYCROFT AVENUE MANAGEMENT LTD Address: KATZ & CO, 135 NOTTING HILL GATE, LONDON, W11 3LB

https://hellopages.co.uk/business-report/forty-seven-hollycroft-management-company-limited-london-01023522

Hampstead Children researchers will be familiar with this address because Ricky Dearman used to live at a similar address BUT in Hampstead. (47, Hollycroft Avenue, London NW3 7QJ)

Going back to Draper's company where he was a director from 2000 to 2008, I had a look on Google maps. And right next to it, is a PIZZA EXPRESS at No. 137. (https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.5086107,-0.1992641,3a,90y,152.26h,81.04t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1seIp4oJ4hCtwM1vZZW1TPkA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1))

Currently, there are three directors:

1. Suzanne Perry journalist, (Suzi Perry) who lives in Hampstead, http://www.checkdirector.co.uk/director/suzanne-perry/, http://nativemonster.com/lifestyle/saturday-morning-live-in-wolverhampton, http://imgur.com/a/JPHSD

2. Vincent Sagua, who is British and currently living in the United Arab Emirates, working for a satellite broadcast company https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/mQwzInCYylop_PYfkiOe_sej0fY/appointments, http://yahlive.com/key-executives (Chief financial officer), http://yahlive.com/content/overview

3. Tatian Savkin who works in finance and lives in the UK http://www.checkdirector.co.uk/director/tatiana-savkin/

EDIT: Corrected Ricky Dearman's address from 4 to 47.

https://www.scribd.com/document/336623191/5555-pdf

For the full run down on the medical reports, see here https://www.facebook.com/notes/believe-the-children/what-exactly-did-the-medical-reports-state/303097436752588

And not once have you answered my question. You are not interested in truth. You run from it. Run away rather than face it and answer it. That one simple question that you still cannot answer. Hurl more abuse at me and call me a a liar or a pedo protector or anything that is the usual response to this simple question. I have not lied once. I have shown what is documented and what was said by the children themselves and other professionals. You ignore the lies being told by Abraham and the mother, but transferring that blame to me is much easier than answering that one simple yes or no question.

You are a coward who will not face the truth about what Abraham did nor even admit it, so run away. It is what cowards do. It is what Abraham and the mother did also, rather than face the courts where the real truth would have come out.

It definitely sounds like you are trying to protect and support a verified physical and mental abuser of the children (including his own and their mother).

My only interest is in seeing anyone guilty of abuse of children punished. Your only interest is in protecting the person who actually is verified to have abused them. Not that you have the guts to admit that because you still keep avoiding that question.

Again, you are avoiding the question. It is a very simple one with a simple yes or no answer. So stop changing the subject and deflecting away from answering it.

Yes or no. Do you think the children should go back to the same place Abraham will have access to them?

Great place to start https://hoaxteadresearch.wordpress.com/2016/02/14/video-evidence-abe-blatantly-coaches-kids/

Start researching more info on step father Abraham Christie and mother Ella Draper. There is a reason these children were taken away from her and she is on the run

Thank you for your support, there are many of us contributing to the cause...I am but a link in the chain of great case supporters

I wasn't comparing these children with the other girl. Sorry it offends you but I don't believe these children. From interviews I have seen, together and separate, I believe they were fed this information.

Their mother telling the little boy that when his seed touches his sister he can get her pregnant? To wash his hands so his seed doesn't make a deformed baby with his sister? That teachers, parents, his father and children were ALL in one handicapped bathroom molesting them?

Not only does their body language seem way off for an abused child, there are too many details given in their stories (rehersed) without prompting from the psychologist.

I am a mother of 5 children with a BA in Psychology-minor in child/adolescent development. We will have to just agree to disagree on this one. Have a great day :)

Edit: Also adding that I am a survivor of child sexual abuse as well.

This was already addressed in that the mother had given the children suppositories for their constipation and was therefore the most likely cause.

The scarring was not what it was made out to be and was well within the norm. It was not sign of long term abuse. That was the conclusion of the peer review.

Wow. No surprise at the avoidance of answering my question.

It is the thing you are most scared of - facing the reality of the situation those children faced.

You would rather fight to allow the children back into the same house as that evil prick than admit he abused the children and would also continue to do so.

He was already cautioned for beating up one of his own kids. He put his children's mother in hospital once and has been jailed for violence, drugs and dishonesty 37 times to date.

You are the one who is pathetic for turning your blind and biased eye to the abuse he did to them. You would enable him to do it again. You refuse to condemn what that man did and pass it off as a little bruise and two cuts. He would be so proud of you.

The children said whatever Abraham forced them to say. The police had no legal right to examine the accused when the children told them they had lied. Why should any of those expose themselves on someone else's say so? Why do you not ask those people that question and let them answer it for you.

The simplest explanation is not a double one. It is the whole story of what the children said from start to finish. The were in the beginning scared and tortured by Abraham and once out of his 'care' they told how he had used his own methods to make them say those things. They did not want to ever go back to him again. Nor to their own mother while he was still with her. That is the words of the children which again you ignore.

Now be so kind as to answer my question.

I have informed myself and watched the videos of these two children. I also have a BA in Psychology minor in child/adolescent development, a mother of 5 children and I'm also a survivor of sexual abuse.

I do believe this child was abused https://youtu.be/72OznY9ByZo

Let me remind you of what is the truth -

"the physical injuries described by the children as having been inflicted by Abraham Christie were, indeed, caused by him. I reject as baseless Ms Draper’s suggestion that instead Mr Dearman was responsible. A straightforward conclusion given that neither child had seen him for about three months at the time of Dr Hodes’ examination and subsequent police photography. Those photographs clearly show recent rather than healed injuries."

And seeing as the children had been in Morocco for weeks with Abraham and Ella, how else were those fresh injuries caused?

You get that strong feeling because your confirmation bias only allows anybody that questions allegations to be classed as on the side of the alleged perpetrators, rather than a person who actually seeks the real truth. You dismiss fact but believe fiction. Attacking anyone that disagrees with you and your view is your only defense because you never answer the hard questions.

How were those freshly examined, photographed and catalogued injuries caused? The bruise on her forehead. The cut on her chin and the one on her leg. Answer that.

I have looked into this case and in a more indepth way than most people have. Most people do not investigate nor question the original story. They also will not confront the hard questions about Abraham and choose to ignore them or think of him as the children's savior.

Let me ask you one question. Would you be happy to let the children back into same house as Abraham to live?

I am in no way connected to this case but did spend a lot of time investigating all the evidence and reading it thoroughly.

The police did investigate but found nothing where there was supposed to be something. No secret rooms and no places that were as described by the children. They toured round with them in a car and when they confronted the children over the lack of finding any single one thing, the children admitted they lied because Abraham made them with violence.

Again, Dr Hodes was not supported in her findings by her peers. All injuries on the children were recent and therefore COULD NOT have been by the father who they had not seen for 3 months.

You also fail to mention Dr Sturge's assessment of the children. Part of that is in the Judge's summary and is well worth reading. 144 onwards.

I am neither naive nor stupid. Both of those traits belong to people who refuse to accept that the only person proven to have hurt the children was Abraham, and their mother, who allowed him to do so.

Oh rats. I signed the petition, but just as I signed it I noticed a check box that said I would be kept informed about this and other similar petitions, so now I guess I'm going to be getting more spam.

Signed! Great way to forge forward.

thank you!

Signed

The UK gov has FOREVER been stalling, sabotaging, subverting any attempts at exposing paedos in positions of power. It seems to be endemic.

Here is a good graphic which explains it https://sli.mg/sCzV9c

Check this out - "The Pedophocracy" - https://wikispooks.com/wiki/The_Pedophocracy

there is a link at the bottom to the full book http://www.whale.to/b/pedophocracy.html

I will try to promote your petition.

A good way would be to hijack popular hashtags on Twitter etc and tie in the fact that these things get squashed

"The Hampstead Children Petition - don't let the Government silence child victims of Satanic Ritual Abuse - #PedoFiles #Hampstead #SRA #PizzaGate" then the graphic above

Signed!

Been interested in this case for a while, I definitely believe those children. Signing petition now.

This story turned out to be a hoax because the mother's boyfriend had been the one who had forced the children to say those things.

He had child porn on his phone and was physically and emotionally abusing the kids. Did a runner with the mother when the police were about to arrest him.

I did not know there was a global petition. Thanks for sharing.