Please help us.
We have a chance to petition the investigating commission in the UK (IPCC) who is now questioning the first investigation (or lack there of) of the Hampstead Abuse case. We believe the children's testimonies and medical reports, we know this is a cover-up.
Plenty of links in the petition. Petition only asks for name and email, not your address. This is a global petition, anyone can sign.
The IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) needs to hear our voices. This case has connections as you all know to CF & Haiti. Please upvoat so other voaters can see and share...Thank you!
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/believe-the-children
view the rest of the comments →
OpenSoulOpenMind ago
Been interested in this case for a while, I definitely believe those children. Signing petition now.
norobotono ago
When you say you believe them do you mean when they first made the allegations or afterwards when the police drove them around all the places they were supposed to have been and none of their allegations checked out and when they were confronted by this, they admitted that the mother's boyfriend forced them to say it all?
ListenUp ago
We believe the children's initial video testimonies, the "Jean-Clement concealed evidence" recordings, the first two police interviews of both children, and we believe whole-heartedly the third interview of Sept. 17 was a coerced retraction by both children. I believe the children more than the adults trying to cover up the case. The harder you try, the more I believe the children
norobotono ago
You are aware it was Jean-Clement who turned him in because he was so concerned about his treatment of the children.
ListenUp ago
Turned Abe into who? Jean-Clement was concerned about the children alright, they'd been getting raped at school. Most people show concern for children getting raped at school. We've been at this for a long time now, this case isn't going away. Ever.
norobotono ago
It was Jean-Clement that went to the police with his secret recorded he made with them at his house. Not Abraham.
Also in that session it becomes known that Abraham had been working on this story full time for a whole month with the children, which begs the question of why if there was a suspicion of abuse up to two months prior, instead of going immediately to the police like any normal parent would do, they instead went to Morocco for a month. Was it perhaps to get the evidence that Abraham told Jean-Clement in several phone calls the month earlier that he would need?
Jean-Clement wanted the children taken out of the reach of Abraham, and being a diligent and responsible person also handed over the recordings to the police so they could investigate fully. Abraham nor the mother did that. Ask yourself why.
Here is an example of what disturbed him -
"106. Another significant feature of the audio recording relates to the intense animation generated by Mr Christie when he is urging the children to chant, over and over again, “Kill the babies … Kill, kill, kill … Let’s say it together … I like the sound of it!” The children, unsurprisingly, join in with the chanting and Mr Christie’s evident excitement."
"Let’s say it together … I like the sound of it!" This guy is one sick and twisted piece of work.
ListenUp ago
Lol, always deflecting back to Abraham...it's your usual tactic. Jean Clement was MEANT to turn over the recording to police, that was THE PLAN. Abraham went to Jean Clement's home to report to him first in order to know how to proceed. The children's testimonies at Jean Clement's home were given to a police officer (Jean Clement) and it was HIS DUTY to hand these recordings over. This was the "initial contact" with police.
"The 3 hour recording made by Jean Clement, Abraham’s brother-in-law, a Special Police Sergeant. On the day the family returned to the U.K. after the children’s disclosures on September the 4th Alisa, Gabriel , Abraham and Crystal, the family dog arrived late in the evening to Jean Clement’s home address. Jean Clement’s wife, Abraham’s sister was asleep upstairs. Ella and Abraham had enjoyed little rest since the children’s disclosures and were both still coming to terms with the situation, so Ella had gone home to relax and shower, and was scheduled to meet up with them all later. The children were calm, alert and happy to be finally free of their burden, yet would still persistently attempt the programmed ‘intimate touching,’ which would trigger more dysfunctional behavior. Jean Clement handed this recorded evidence and private video testimonies to D.I. Cannon of Barnet Police station. D.S. Rogers then concealed this critical evidence in a police property store an hour’s drive away from Barnet Police station in Chingford. The full 2 hr. 53 min. recording gives the listener an extraordinary insight into the Hampstead Cover Up. This recording has never before been published in its entirety." Text taken from the mother's Youtube video titled "Hampstead Cover Up. The concealed evidence - Jean Clement's recording." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnVA4qEnyXI
Here's the transcription of the entire recording...https://dearmandoeshampstead.wordpress.com/2016/04/29/the-jean-clement-recording/
norobotono ago
I mention Abraham because he was the only one proven to have abused the children which every single supported of this story DEFLECTS away from when questioned.
So how about you answer that one simple question - would you be happy to allow the children back into his company?
Yes, lets not forget the dog who the mother cared more about than her own children. She could sneak back to her house for the dog but never once turned up for any meetings or court dates to get her children back.
And people should listen to those recordings to see how that sick pervert bullied the children and what a fantasy land he lived in. He even accuses Jean-Clement's daughter of being involved too didn't he?
So ask yourself again, why did he not go straight to the police station to report it 2 months prior?