Again you are ignoring that the children said later that Abraham made them say those things and that their dad never did those things to them. They said this when they knew they did not have to see Abraham again.

The children were so terrified of Abraham because he had physically and mentally abused them so that they said what he told them to. He drummed it into them.

He woke them in the middle of the night and made them stay up repeating the things he wanted them to say. He punched the boy so hard he is now partially deaf. He slammed the girl into a wall and kicked her to the ground from behind. He hit her on the forehead so hard with a wooden spoon that the bruise was still visible days later on the video at the airport. He made them kneel on the ground while he poured water over them. And you want them to be returned to the mother so she can subject them to this evil person again? The mother who chose him over her own kids.

You ignore that the medical report showed the children had been drugged by Abraham.

You ignore that a member of the public (possibly the taxi driver) was so horrified at his abusive treatment of the distraught girl that the person reported him to the police, for dragging her around London the night before the police were due to take them on a tour to see the places they had made their claims about. He was telling people she was a baby killer and making her repeat things he wanted her to say. This was backed up by video proof which was shown to the mother after she denied it happened. Same with the Jean-Clement recordings. It is Abraham making them repeat things.

You ignore that he had child porn on his phone (which may even have been the children for all anyone knows, as it was never stated). You certainly don't care if it was because you continue to venerate this sick abuser as a saint and would be happy for the children to be returned back to his vicinity for that same situation to happen again. And let's not forget that the mother is equally as guilty for allowing it to happen. The same mother who was earlier reported to child welfare by a neighbour for locking the children out on a balcony all day with no food or water, in their sleepwear.

All the above is backed up by facts. Medical, video and witness statements.

Facts are what convict people, not salacious stories that you want to believe in.

It was Jean-Clement that went to the police with his secret recorded he made with them at his house. Not Abraham.

Also in that session it becomes known that Abraham had been working on this story full time for a whole month with the children, which begs the question of why if there was a suspicion of abuse up to two months prior, instead of going immediately to the police like any normal parent would do, they instead went to Morocco for a month. Was it perhaps to get the evidence that Abraham told Jean-Clement in several phone calls the month earlier that he would need?

Jean-Clement wanted the children taken out of the reach of Abraham, and being a diligent and responsible person also handed over the recordings to the police so they could investigate fully. Abraham nor the mother did that. Ask yourself why.

Here is an example of what disturbed him -

"106. Another significant feature of the audio recording relates to the intense animation generated by Mr Christie when he is urging the children to chant, over and over again, “Kill the babies … Kill, kill, kill … Let’s say it together … I like the sound of it!” The children, unsurprisingly, join in with the chanting and Mr Christie’s evident excitement."

"Let’s say it together … I like the sound of it!" This guy is one sick and twisted piece of work.