You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

norobotono ago

This story turned out to be a hoax because the mother's boyfriend had been the one who had forced the children to say those things.

He had child porn on his phone and was physically and emotionally abusing the kids. Did a runner with the mother when the police were about to arrest him.

ListenUp ago

No it wasn't Abraham that wore a big "fancy dildo hat" nor was it Abraham that was accused of putting plastic willies up a child's bum, that was Dearman accused by his children. Your strawman tactic is old and used but the children blatantly said Abe & Ella did not harm them like Dearman did. The children had been so used to Dearman's abuse, they didn't even know it was wrong, they thought everyone did it. Until they told their mother and she said it was wrong. Here's a direct quote from the children's testimonies transcribed here " But then, we understood, that when my mum, my mamma, found out about it she told me that its wrong to do this kind of stuff so then I, then me and Q had still been used to, but then we had understood that its wrong.
"

norobotono ago

You pick and choose what went on and totally ignore the real facts in favour of what you choose to believe.

The injuries you think were caused by the father could not have been because they hadn't seen him for weeks. Meaning any damage had to have been caused by other means. The mother admitted giving them enemas for their constipation.

The doctor that examined the children (twice) used outdated methods to reach her conclusion and her peers were so horrified by her conduct that they reviewed her work and under intense questioning, had her admit her errors (and bias). None of her peers agreed with her. Are you going to accuse them all of being involved too?

The medical report also showed the results of the physical abuse inflicted on them by Abraham, who had kicked, punched and slammed the girl into a wall. The leg wound was still fresh and scabbed. The girl was partially deaf because he hit her so hard against the side of her ear it damaged her that much. But do carry ignoring all those real facts. You are the ones supporting a proven abuser by supporting him.

ListenUp ago

You cannot say that about Dr. Hodes medical reports. She is NHS specialist in child abuse with over 30 years of service.
Those most perfect reports can be found here http://hampsteadcoverup.com/evidence And an excellent piece by "Crimes of Empire" is here https://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/11/hampstead-leaked-medical-reports-end-all-doubt-about-sexual-abuse-claims/ titled, "Hampstead: Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims"
Again, with your lame strawman theory. I won't even entertain the arguement anymore. I want Dearman and his associates, which by the sounds of it you may be one of them, to be investigated by a real investigation team, not by the officers that were implicated by the children, nor the same ones that re-investigated themselves for the IPCC review. I want non-baby eating cops to stand up and investigate these horrific crimes. I'm saying right here and now, NO MORE! NO MORE! Did you hear me Dearman? NO. MORE. NO MORE PEDOPHILE ABUSE NETWORKS. NO MORE CONSUMING OUR CHILDREN.
Every citizen needs to stand up and join this fight. The sides are clearly chosen. There are 3 sides, take your pick....Satanist. Luciferian. And those of us caught in the middle of this nightmare war of theirs. I know where I stand. I say, FUCK OFF PEDOS!!!

norobotono ago

It was not me that said it - it was a panel of her peers who also are qualified with many years of experience behind them and not one of them agreed with her findings.

The difference between you and me is that you believe anybody accused of being a pedophile is guilty regardless of any evidence that proves not to be true. I want guilty pedos to be punished to the fullest extent too but I also want to know they actually are guilty. Not everybody who has ever been accused is guilty. Some people accuse for vindictive reasons or in cases of custody battles, as was the case here.

You don't care if the person being accused might be innocent I do, and so should any decent person.