Please help us.
We have a chance to petition the investigating commission in the UK (IPCC) who is now questioning the first investigation (or lack there of) of the Hampstead Abuse case. We believe the children's testimonies and medical reports, we know this is a cover-up.
Plenty of links in the petition. Petition only asks for name and email, not your address. This is a global petition, anyone can sign.
The IPCC (Independent Police Complaints Commission) needs to hear our voices. This case has connections as you all know to CF & Haiti. Please upvoat so other voaters can see and share...Thank you!
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/believe-the-children
view the rest of the comments →
norobotono ago
This story turned out to be a hoax because the mother's boyfriend had been the one who had forced the children to say those things.
He had child porn on his phone and was physically and emotionally abusing the kids. Did a runner with the mother when the police were about to arrest him.
ListenUp ago
No it wasn't Abraham that wore a big "fancy dildo hat" nor was it Abraham that was accused of putting plastic willies up a child's bum, that was Dearman accused by his children. Your strawman tactic is old and used but the children blatantly said Abe & Ella did not harm them like Dearman did. The children had been so used to Dearman's abuse, they didn't even know it was wrong, they thought everyone did it. Until they told their mother and she said it was wrong. Here's a direct quote from the children's testimonies transcribed here " But then, we understood, that when my mum, my mamma, found out about it she told me that its wrong to do this kind of stuff so then I, then me and Q had still been used to, but then we had understood that its wrong. "
norobotono ago
You pick and choose what went on and totally ignore the real facts in favour of what you choose to believe.
The injuries you think were caused by the father could not have been because they hadn't seen him for weeks. Meaning any damage had to have been caused by other means. The mother admitted giving them enemas for their constipation.
The doctor that examined the children (twice) used outdated methods to reach her conclusion and her peers were so horrified by her conduct that they reviewed her work and under intense questioning, had her admit her errors (and bias). None of her peers agreed with her. Are you going to accuse them all of being involved too?
The medical report also showed the results of the physical abuse inflicted on them by Abraham, who had kicked, punched and slammed the girl into a wall. The leg wound was still fresh and scabbed. The girl was partially deaf because he hit her so hard against the side of her ear it damaged her that much. But do carry ignoring all those real facts. You are the ones supporting a proven abuser by supporting him.
ListenUp ago
So did the police. So do you. Why weren't the Jean-Clement Recordings presented in court or used as evidence instead of concealed in a property storage in Chingford? Why weren't the tattoos and distinguishing marks of the abusers that were in the children's testimonies ever investigated? So many questions, BIG QUESTIONS, still remain in the publics minds....regardless of your MK ULTRA/TAVISTOCK designed "Hoaxtead Research". Why are activists and researchers in the UK silenced so harshly? Asking too many questions were they? You try and shut us up by intimidation, harassment and fear. But what you don't realize, all of that helps us see just how important this case is. Not only for Mr. Dearman and his associates but by the very agencies that helped cover it up.
"22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations. J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.
These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions." from https://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/11/hampstead-leaked-medical-reports-end-all-doubt-about-sexual-abuse-claims/
"The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?
There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.
Dr Deborah Hodes https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx"
Two, not ONE, TWO exams those poor children had to endure, each. I think it is only appropriate that the abusers should have to show their tattoos and distinguishing marks. When I say distinguishing marks, I mean warts, piercings and scars that the children identified their abusers with... https://dearmandoeshampstead.wordpress.com/2015/12/16/the-proof-is-in-the-tattoo/
The church has been refurbished, the website taken down, and Father PC is nowhere to be found, where'd he go? Where'd everyone go? You all scattered like dung beatles. It's what you do...
All your lies to confuse readers to keep them away from the real story....are you sure it was the girl that had her ear hurt? I know otherwise.
norobotono ago
Yes, sorry you are correct. It was the boy that Abraham hit so hard that he is now partially deaf. The girl was kicked from behind, slammed into a wall, hit with a metal (not wooden as earlier thought) spoon so hard it left a bruise on her forehead and a cut on her chin, both of which were still visible on video.
Care to comment on this oh so caring treatment of the children?
The church was searched withing days and unannounced and like the other properties they visited, nothing was found that backed up the story.
The medical report does not back up the claims Dr Hodes made. Why do you ignore the peer review?
Why you do you avoid Dr Sturge's report also?