THIS is #PizzaGate - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hxWDyjUAoQ

I like the idea of this post. We need to put our heads together and collaborate with one another to figure out the universal definition of Pizzagate. This should be stickied at the top of the sub, so it's the first thing new visitors see when they arrive, and it should also be the go-to for any discussions irl, when speaking to non-believers or other folks that may be on the fence.

To start the conversation, first we must concisely and clearly state our position, (definition for all practical purposes) and then be ready to present known evidence if the conversation should continue.

We'd got obsesed with Comet, and that was their plan. At least that was worthy for them. Think about it, if we would have found something at Comet, they would have blamed James of everything. Its true there is a lot of movement of kids, but if we dont follow the money now that we can see it, tomorrow will be too late. In fact, it is already getting kind of late, their narrative are wining, their fucking shills are dividing and shitposting... we'd got carried for the pizza, when it all should be about the kids, and the corruption. Even if there is something, who cares in this damn world about a pizza guy? I mean, yeah, he is powerfull, he has contacts... but people doesn't want to belive. Sometimes is better to stay quite, keep working, let them talk, and wait for your moment for giving explanations. we wanted to win inmidiately, but you cant expose some dark organization that's been hiding for centurys in one month.

We got to noisy. pls dont call me shill, just my honest opinion. at least we gathered a lot of info, seed is planted.

The idea that pizza is a code for some sort of organized pedophilia ring is a big part of it,.How far it actually extends is another aspect that I think is important. This could be something that goes on in every community in the US. Freemasonry/Satanism are also important factors.

My personal definition of Pizzagate would only include the human trafficking and pedophilia aspect. I believe that the deep state is involved in many criminal enterprises, including drug trafficking, sex trafficking (Pizzagate), arms dealing, and election theft.

I suggested this yesterday, maybe we should change the name to Pedogate or something, think how normies think, what would they click on.

I'm working on a video that explains what exactly pizzagate is..trying to keep it under 10 minutes showing the circumstantial evidence pointing to pedophilia/human trafficking and what exactly prompted the investigation. MSM is spinning this story so hard =/

I think the fundamental principal of your argument is a valid one. There needs to be a clear and concise definition of what 'Pizzagate' is. Problem is, the various different groups researching this getting on the same page and, unfortunately needs to be political (simply, other politicians are going to use any and all of what we've come up with to discredit so when contriving a definition that needs to be structured with that in mind).

Only human trafficking and pedophilia though? So if Hillary was convicted of selling classified information or arms trafficking, that would not make you say "Pizzagate was real?"

Organized child abuse involving DC officials.

Well said.

Focus on getting an explanation for the bizarre "art" the Podestas admire and collect. Show examples. Ask why the "news" doesn't even try to make a feeble excuse like its just art, and the Podestas have eclectic tastes. Nope, instead they just call it "fake news". Something's fishy. Need Tony to explain his fascination with that artwork and so many others with the same tastes. Imagery if everything, show people the artwork, including Heavy Breathing performances and videos.

Really? Which denomination of Pizzagate are you, again? No way.

Human trafficking.

I think the key term here should be the "Gate" aspect. "Watergate" was a hotel, and that was what spawned all subsequent "gates"; the term "gate" simply became a catch-all suffix to imply scandal of one kind or another. Watergate was just the tip that some other iceberg was attached to. The hotel room break-in was just axiomatic of the paranoia that ran through the Nixon Whitehouse. So to, I see this weirdness with the "pizza" stuff as axiomatic of the notion that there are rings of pedophiles that run in high circles.

I think it's important that we do not allow ourselves to be deluded into thinking the rich and influential automatically equal depraved. There are plenty of decent trailer-park dwellers that do not beat their kids, and likewise, there are genuinely benevolent wealthy people. But I agree; focusing merely on this pizza joint is going to derail the focus on a genuinely real problem. For myself, I think that at the very least, the people revolving around this pizza place are weird, and suspicious. But until we find that one piece that is the "smoking gun" (which has now become a hackneyed phrase), it's better to just follow the evidence wherever it takes us, and not force everything into this one narrative.

Just my two-cents anyway.

I think a key point is suspicion. I would define it as:

An investigation based on verified email leaks published by Wikileaks that numerous high-level government officials in both major political parties could be heavily involved in illegal activities ranging from child abuse and human trafficking to bribery and money laundering.

It's not remotely comprehensive but it's true, and doesn't smack of insanity, which is the entire design of the media definition. To make it sound as extreme as possible and make sure there's no implication whatsoever of nuance.

My definition is the same as yours but I was reading the wikileaks before the election. For someone new I would present it as an investigation into child porn and child abuse for profit or blackmail by people in washington. Some people may be too sensitive to child abuse issues and in that case emphasis some other aspect such as the covert arms trafficking, war mongering and global extortion or drug trafficking, or just tell them to read the wikileaks and think for themselves.

This is a standard bias. They can't imagine caring with less than 100% certainty, therefore anyone who cares must be 100% certain.