I think I know what the problems is with non-believers. Their definition of Pizzagate is different than ours. We need to formally define our definition of Pizzagate. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by anon123

After arguing with a non-believer today I realized his definition of Pizzagate is narrowed such that when someone says "Pizzagate is real", they mean there is 100% certainty a pedo ring involving high level government officials is running through Comet Ping Pong. I said not necessarily. Yes there could be that, but Pizzagate deals with any of: human trafficking, drug trafficking, illegal arms dealing, contract killing, pedophilia, money laundering, selling classified information, treason, ect., and deals with: Clinton Foundation, Soros, Obama, Biden, other high level government officials. Is that our definition? What is your definition of Pizzagate?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Baluga ago

Organized child abuse involving DC officials.

anon123 ago

Only child abuse though? What about arms trafficking, money laundering, selling classified information, ect.?

Baluga ago

I should include child trafficking as well. All those other things are real and connected to the Clinton Foundation, but I consider them secondary.

anon123 ago

So if Clinton Foundation was convicted of arms trafficking or money laundering instead, would that not make you say Pizzagate was proven to be true? Where do you draw the line for illegal activities that are Pizzagate related and aren't Pizzagate related?

Baluga ago

That's why I draw the line. I'd like the Clinton Foundation to be dismantled, but if that's all that happened and we didn't clean up a major pedo ring I'd say that's not good enough.

As far as arms trafficking goes, it's already in the open: foreign governments gave money to the foundation, money to Bill for speeches, Hillary authorized arms to be sent to foreign governments. Technically each part is legal, but when linked it shows corruption. That's not pizzagate.