I think I know what the problems is with non-believers. Their definition of Pizzagate is different than ours. We need to formally define our definition of Pizzagate. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by anon123

After arguing with a non-believer today I realized his definition of Pizzagate is narrowed such that when someone says "Pizzagate is real", they mean there is 100% certainty a pedo ring involving high level government officials is running through Comet Ping Pong. I said not necessarily. Yes there could be that, but Pizzagate deals with any of: human trafficking, drug trafficking, illegal arms dealing, contract killing, pedophilia, money laundering, selling classified information, treason, ect., and deals with: Clinton Foundation, Soros, Obama, Biden, other high level government officials. Is that our definition? What is your definition of Pizzagate?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

kekistocrat ago

I think the fundamental principal of your argument is a valid one. There needs to be a clear and concise definition of what 'Pizzagate' is. Problem is, the various different groups researching this getting on the same page and, unfortunately needs to be political (simply, other politicians are going to use any and all of what we've come up with to discredit so when contriving a definition that needs to be structured with that in mind).

anon123 ago

Exactly. I think MSM will have a much easier time defending themselves if we define our cause to only involve Comet Ping Pong and pedo rings. To me, Pizzagate is a much broader conspiracy that CPP and pedo rings are just one branch of that conspiracy.