I think I know what the problems is with non-believers. Their definition of Pizzagate is different than ours. We need to formally define our definition of Pizzagate. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by anon123

After arguing with a non-believer today I realized his definition of Pizzagate is narrowed such that when someone says "Pizzagate is real", they mean there is 100% certainty a pedo ring involving high level government officials is running through Comet Ping Pong. I said not necessarily. Yes there could be that, but Pizzagate deals with any of: human trafficking, drug trafficking, illegal arms dealing, contract killing, pedophilia, money laundering, selling classified information, treason, ect., and deals with: Clinton Foundation, Soros, Obama, Biden, other high level government officials. Is that our definition? What is your definition of Pizzagate?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2impendingdoom ago

My definition is the same as yours but I was reading the wikileaks before the election. For someone new I would present it as an investigation into child porn and child abuse for profit or blackmail by people in washington. Some people may be too sensitive to child abuse issues and in that case emphasis some other aspect such as the covert arms trafficking, war mongering and global extortion or drug trafficking, or just tell them to read the wikileaks and think for themselves.

anon123 ago

I think instead of waiting to see how they react to specifically child related issues, we could just say up front that Pizzagate is about any of: human trafficking, arms trafficking, extortion, drug trafficking, war mongering, child porn, child abuse. I think that would make it much more believable.