You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

arigold ago

i didn't even read your post, but i don't have to. STOP REACHING..... the further out you try to get the more ground we lose.

You guys don't have to take my word for it......but I seriously suggest staying away from the following:

DO NOT try to connect Hollywood, Mainstream pizza chains, Sandy Hook, 9/11, Boston Bombings, ISIS, random people who like pizza that have no relation to the podestas, Papa Johns, Oscar Meyer, Flat Earth, Mandela Effect, JFK Assasination,

Don't use the following terms: Illuminati NWO

we need to solve pizzagate before we try to make it connect to even bigger conspiracies.

CynthiaGlass ago

You aren't going to "solve pizzagate" with blinders on. There are real tentacles from Corrupticut to the District of Corruption. And they are very convoluted. My research uncovered connections via "charities" set up (by people connected with SH) for Haiti, Dominican Republic and Uganda, with links to the deeply corrupt AmeriCares and the Clinton Foundation. Clinton is all over Sandy Hook, and with Clinton comes organized pedophilia. Telling other researchers what they can and can't say, words they can't use, etc. is censorship. It has no place in an open inquiry.

doubletake ago

good stuff. heard Lionel the other day saying Conspiracy Analysis is what we're doing. Much more respectable. associated with science, forensics, deductive sherlock stuff. Also a great reply when somebody accuses you of being a CTer. they'll have to stop and think about it.

Pizzagatethroaway499 ago

Just to let you know also, I didn't try to make this connect and I know some connections are far reaching! I just kept stumbling onto the same clues that took me back to Sandy Hook and I guess since I had just discovered that it is probable orchestrated "operation" it was fresh on my mind. The Covenant House connection was first and then as I was researching the Sandlers because of the handkerchief connection and the email from Podesta's assistant to Herb Sandler the day after Maddie McCann went missing. I saw exactly how influencial Herb Sandler was to the transition and White House appointees. He sent him lots of emails during the time of the transition! Then as I was looking at some of them I stumbled on Tara O'Toole and when I saw what she did with Homeland Security and the two operations she produced I thought of what the Newtown employee said about Homeland Security being involved. The clues led me there I was trying to make it work. Trust me, it scares the hell out of me.

voatcaesarpizza ago

Don't use the following terms: Illuminati NWO

Fucking amen to that. Certain words and events just make people dismiss you right away. They won't listen to you if you start going off about the New World Order and how you think Sandy Hook was a hoax. The latter will even make them resent you.

This subvoat is the center of the investigation because it's more accessible than 4chan's /pol/.

We must consider our image to new users and potential recruits. I'm not saying don't make connections, but be very careful how you guys word things.

Pizzagatethroaway499 ago

Please read above what I said to arigold. And my point is exactly that when I wrote the post! The fact it turns people off to say it was a hoax! I thought that was so far reaching nobody could possibly pull that off and do I would dismiss the person but the clues took me back there! It's also weird how Alex Jones was all Sandy Hook this and that and now there is a guy who was just locked up a few days ago for investigating it and he hadn't said a word! And guess what, I wouldn't even know about it if I haven't been threatened online!

voatcaesarpizza ago

I watched the documentary and they make some decent points, but also make some bad points. The google cache is really the smoking gun they should have focused on more prominently. Something fishy happened there, that's for sure.

Pizzagatethroaway499 ago

That's not what FBIAnon said.

voatcaesarpizza ago

Why do we put so much faith in FBIAnon? He didn't provide a shred of proof, even going so far as to say he lied to us for "plausible deniability". Most of the stuff he said was vague enough anyway that they have the same basic legitimacy as a horoscope. All he had to do was drop one solid connection in his "suggestions", just one smoking gun, but he didn't. Or all he had to do was prove he was who he said he was. He could have figured something out, surely.

Pizzagatethroaway499 ago

I'm not sure but he seems to be correct so far. He started talking 7/2/16 before DNC leaks or Podesta emails.

graboid0 ago

FBIanon in one of his message said "tuesday at 11am"

Which coincides with the FBI archive vault twitter account becoming active again.

There might be only so much proof he can give...