You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

9579143? ago

EDIT: I agree with go1dfish in that it would be better to use an existing cryptocurrency if this or something like this were to be done at all.

Putt what would be the feasibility / potential benefits of creating VoatCoin and incorporating it into the Voat system / framework somehow? We have goats who could probably do the legwork of creating the currency and then you could add features surrounding it -- doing so might encourage a larger percentage of the userbase to get involved with cryptocurrency, be able to donate without obstruction, and might even attract others to Voat. It doesn't have to be like reddit gold -- it could be as simple as a secondary upvote that transfers 1/100 of a cent worth of VoatCoin to the wallet of the person receiving the upvote. Everyone on Voat would want to have some VoatCoin. Just a thought that could be expanded upon.

@bikergang_accountant @Fred-Stiller-OnAWire @go1dfish (sorry go1dfish, I think this is the 3rd time I've pinged you in recent days)

go1dfish ago

Please don't. There are plenty of great cryptocurrencies already.

If this sort of thing interests you check out this post instead:

https://voat.co/v/voatdev/1923981

I would like to see some cryptocurrency integration with Voat, but not a Voat specific cryptocurrency.

bikergang_accountant ago

People really need to stop calling bitcoin distributed. It's just copied. If you want a distributed voat, which I think you do, there are distributed content networks that are much more viable than any blockchain system. When people hear distributed they shouldn't automatically think of blockchain. You could actually attach it to Freenet. It's just a distributed content cache, with cryptographic sharding, and multi layer proxy like tor. It's somewhere between DHT, tor, and bittorrent.

Also you could just fork it and set up your own seed servers and it would be 100% incompatable with the other network, sort of like starting a altcoin is as easy as selecting a private key, a seed server just get's people their first 1 or 2 peers. It's really light weight to set up a seperate network because if you have a seperate pool of peers you have a seperate network.

Ok, it wouldn't be 100% incompatable because someone could intentionally leak peers into the other network, but it would be interesting to use a global key as part of the cryptography making the content intentionally incompatable (if you have a hash of a file, and peers from another network you still can't utilize the key so seperate key space).