As promised I wanted to drop a small note about the action of modding a user to various system subs in an effort to purge SPAM. While this action was innocent and done to help Voat users have a more pleasurable experience, it has raised a few concerns and violated a rule we have in place for Subverse transfers.
So let me give you the background of this and then I will tell you what we are going to do.
Background
Voat has been hit with quite a few SPAM waves. Some of these waves are rather sophisticated and know our software base because they know the holes in our logic and can flood Voat with SPAM. When this happens, Voat’s new queues become unreadable.
Users have been complaining about this for a very long time. Other users have offered to help purge the spam but we have turned them down mostly because we have seen what malicious mods can do to subs when they “flip” (anon the sub, post malicious CSS, go on deletion purges, mod alts, etc.). So we let the spam be.
@Cynabuns contacted Voat many months ago and offered to help, but because of our concerns we delayed. It wasn't until recently that we decided to give it a try. Please support @Cynabuns for offering to help. We've already communicated our expectations with @Cynabuns and it should be a good thing for Voat. If not, then we will demod. It's that simple.
What we are going to do
We are going to implement a “Janitor” mod level. This Janitor level will have restricted permissions. This will allow System subs to take on more Janitors to help purge and discourage SPAM while not being able to perform any other malicious actions that we have been fearful of. I’ve already started working on this and @Cynabuns is going to help us test it.
On Rule Violation
I didn’t even consider the System rule violation when I modded @Cynabuns. Since it was a special case I didn’t even check other than to ensure this user wasn’t over the 10 subs. If this was a full mod case (subverse transfer) the bot would have rejected it but I did it manually so was unaware. We will be amending the rule to exclude these “Janitor” positions from this restriction.
On the other concerns
I really appreciate the passion Voat users have towards making sure Voat doesn’t go down the rabbit hole. It shows our users care and that means a lot to us. While we can’t satisfy everyone’s desires and demands we just want to reassure the users with concerns that this action wasn’t a preamble to anything sinister (You’ll just have to trust us until we can prove it).
On Soon™
We will have another announcement soon on a rather exciting development.
Requests
We have received 0 NS/FISA requests.
Nesano ago
Just do what Discord does in regards to permission granularity.
PM_ME_UR_NOODZ ago
PM_ME_UR_NOODZ ago
Omg! For reals???? Did it get downvoated or.... no, you know what it doesn't matter. If spam was ever visible to anyone anywhere then it is absolutely unacceptable and all principles must be abandoned to ensure that it never happens again!
downvoter ago
This is so great I'm gonna going to be sick!
HorusTheAvenger ago
NICE! Thank you...
SaneGoatiSwear ago
it's all good alduin, crisis averted. voat is well handled and on the up and up :)
profanion ago
Are there any measures for users to be able to to de-janitor users in case of abuse?
Alois_sticklgruber ago
Glad you care. Keep up the good work
Disappointed ago
Not long ago you promised users would have some input into who would be modding system subs.
https://voat.co/v/announcements/729257 The second top comment here shows that any level 2 can just request one of their buddies to mod and build up a little power base that is almost impossible to remove because you admins are reluctant to remove abusive mods.
Now we have janitors who can just put their hand up behind the scenes, without the userbase having any knowledge and sometime later they are modding subs and deleting comments at their discretion.
Edit: Fixed a link
cynoclast ago
When you get one you won't be able to say this. You need a proper warrant canary.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
see the new one... but putt's saying they'll only do it once.
why won't they keep the new one permanent?!?
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1322376
Mick ago
People have been offering to help you since the day I joined Voat and you and Atko ignored every request. Is it any wonder some mods, me included, gave up giving a shit about this place?
6468744? ago
Technically, your own profile says that you submitted there 4 times, but I see your point.
I'm just saying that you're not seeing the full picture of the constant attempts to discredit PV if you just look at /hot, and that we are not anywhere near as bad as SRS. We help regular users resolve issues with moderators (just from helping with the discussion, we've gotten bans removed, rules cleared up, and users happily submitting posts and comments again), we call out bad users who are trying to start baseless witch hunts against good moderators (both of my v/news submissions are reposts from people who didn't follow the rules, got angry enough about it to rant about "I've been censored!" on PV or whatever, and then got called out for not even glancing at the subverse's sidebar or the moderator tag and comments on the post), and we always give even the worst moderators a chance to explain themselves (the open discussion post to she during the AskVoat controversy, the 3 repeated posts that increasingly called on eggnogg to explain why he was deleting something that didn't break the subverse rules, the discussion post that asked alllie to explain their censoring actions, etc.).
You want to know how trustworthy a moderator is or a community is, look at the logs for their subverses. The only thing that ever gets deleted on PV is spammed shitposts, and even then only if it's a duplicate.
We have tried to answer the questions brought up by everyone who posts a question on PV. Some are willing to listen to our response, some say nothing after their initial post, some try to guide the responses in the same direction that the question was originally biased, and some get angry enough to start spamming when we don't agree with their views (notably Amalek and his belief that he, to paraphrase some of his rants, "is never ever ever guilty of ever spamming anywhere, ever", and thus should be bathed in upvotes everywhere he goes on Voat {rather than banned for spamming} because he thinks he is smarter than everyone else on Voat).
Throw in all the alt accounts used by the powermods and trolls (both on Reddit, and on Voat with Techius, MH101, and Amalek), and we might suffer from a bit of confirmation bias if we think that you're just another troll account, but we do still mean well.
Ina_Pickle ago
I agree that I don't know all the details. I spend most of my time in places other than PV and SDBH. I don't even know (nor usually care- no offense) who most of the regulars are in those two subs. I am just basing my opinion from what I've personally experienced, which has been a mixed bag with both groups.
I guess the biggest issue I have with PV is that it claims to be working for Voat, yet has a very apparent Us versus Them mentality going on in the comments sections. I believe protecting Voat is something all of us should be working for. It is all of our responsibilities, not just a clique in one subverse.
Then I see things like someone from PV getting special privileges and it throws up a huge red flag, because while PV may think they are working in Voat's best interests, not everyone agrees with the methods or sometimes the goals.
So I guess thanks, for working towards keeping Voat a free speech zone. However, I am not quite happy with the fact that a regular in a subverse that already likes to moderate content (yes, I know you say it is abusive content) has someone gathering control of multiple system subs and now widespread power to delete whatever.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
i am not a troll.
this comment was not 100% disinfo. it was 95% disinfo. wow, slipping!
weezkitty ago
Suggest a better solution to deal with hordes of spam.
plake1 ago
the mods that have contacted me have been incredibly offensive. I do not know from what criteria you work, but these guys have no business having that much power when they only abuse it.
The problem is understandable, but the mods that have contacted me, and been SO OFFENSIVE, should never have been mods in the first place
(and my biggest offense has been not agreeing with their opinion).
edit: Just saw this on your profile: if you feel you've been downvoted by one particular user just PM me so I can see how prevalent this issue really is. While that is an intelligent approach, this goes on in spades. And I know you know this. Mods have been no help, and many are the problem. They even use the info to argue their positions - that is abuse of confidential information. (not specifying you, though)
auto_turret ago
Are.. are we all going to die?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
THIS USER, @ADHDFERRET HAS POSTED DOZENS OF COMMENTS AND SPENT OVER 10 HOURS WRITING THEM IN THE PAST WEEK THAT ARE ENTIRELY FILLED WITH DISINFORMATION TACTICS AND FALLACIES.
HE HAS DONE NOTHING BUT ATTEMPT TO ATTACK MY CHARACTER AND ASSOCIATE ME WITH NEGATIVE CONCEPTS, WITH A NUMBER OF INSULTS THROWN IN.
HE DOES NOT PARTICIPATE IN MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION, HE IS AT BEST A TROLL AT WORST A SHILL,
WHILE HE HAS THE FREEDOM TO SPEAK,
LET IT BE KNOWN THAT THIS USER DOESN'T SPEAK ENGLISH, HE SPEAKS DISINFORMATION.
SOURCE: ALL OF YOUR COMMENT HISTORY TO ME IN THE PAST WEEK.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
the greatest proof you'll ever get of a gag is SPECIFIC avoidance of the subject.
all we can do is infer
do you not understand this?
lol i've posted a few mega posts that went front page about it, FILLED TO THE BRIM WITH SOURCES
fucking shill tactics from a v/niggers mod.
ftw.
CivetGenet ago
Not really throwing a tantrum, pointing out the truth. I don't care about my score/karma/whatever but this problem of downvoating without saying anything is all over the site. That lack of engagement is an issue, it just leads to restricted accounts and less discussion. I dont need people to upvoat me, I dont care if they downvoat me, but that many fucking downvoats on a factual statement is just ridiculous. Refute it!
6468344? ago
I see that you have posted on v/soapdoxbanhammer, the same place that regularly floods /new of v/protectvoat with shitposts (attacks against the users, "questions" that the OP already has an answer they are trying to "guide" the "discussion" towards, pages upon pages of low-quality "memes", literally posting images of shit and claiming that it's PV users, etc.) and tries to defend moderators guilty of abusing their powers to censor users (she, eggnogg, alllie, HenryCorp, etc.).
If you don't want the regulars at v/protectvoat to assume that you're just there to insult, derail, and attack, then it would probably be a good idea to stop having all the SDBH regulars from proving that stereotype every single time they post on PV.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
try harder, this comment is 100% disinformation tactics.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
you know i'm literally taking all this flak to get to the bottom of what happened to voat, to make sure it's a place that still fully supports free speech, so subs like v/niggers - which you mod - can stay solid online, and have a home.
where there is hate, there is freedom
and yet you have spent hour upon hour writing nothing but disinformation tactics and fallacies at me.
why ferret?
i thought you of all people (a mod of v/niggers!) would be FOR free speech, and FOR asking questions to the admins about curious ongoings... to make sure voat stays a platform where we can ALL "have our say."
i guess i was wrong about you.
now go get your badge from puttitout for shittalking me.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Decided it was easier lubing up and spreading your cheeks for them to fuck you in the ass more so than defending yourself and your freedom?
HarveyHarveyJones ago
He also said he didn't reply because he didn't have an answer.... SO DISCUSS THIS SHIT WITH YOUR FELLOW GOATS!! His reply (or lack thereof) should strike a chord with a lot of users.
SackOfSteel ago
Voat is definitely compromised dude. Their code isn't even open source anymore and now Puttitout has just empowered the mod and brigade cabal. They've also been acting out of character and are refusing to answer questions and our canary is a joke.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Maybe something transparent since all this shit is see through.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
They owe all their users answers.
SackOfSteel ago
Fuck off. /ProtectVoat does exactly that. It looks out for Voat, not Voat's users. You guys justify censorship. You are the brigaders and mod cabal. Fuck off.
ScreaminMime ago
Why aren't the regular Mods taking care of this problem in their verses and simply recruiting other Mods to help them if they need it.
A notification that there has been a post in a verse you are modding would help.
Ina_Pickle ago
Except it isn't off topic. People are still donating to keep the site active. Yet there is a possibility that Putt and Atko are not even in control of their own accounts. The Putt and Atko from a year ago would never have allowed something like Cynabun to happen. much less with their blessing.
I didn't know about the warrant canary issue, but it appears to be just one more piece of evidence that Putt and Atko were compromised.
Ina_Pickle ago
Ah yes. Buns. And when inevitably she does cross a line, we can expect something to be done about it months later. I wouldn't have thought that this time last year. But a pattern of complaints has been emerging recently. If it takes months for admin to correct actual problems with the site, then it will likely take longer to remove a rogue mod they personally put in place.
Why? Because they would have to admit they were wrong. It's human nature.
In other words, I am not supportive of the decision at all. Except for people who are chummy with this person, not many people here are likely to be comfortable with someone who constantly seeks out power.
doubleherpes ago
I'd like to be a janitor. Very anti-censorship, very anti-spam. And I know some great places to find quality escorts in Punjab! No CC required!
SaneGoatiSwear ago
just a
lilALOT :)CivetGenet ago
Hows it off topic? If Voat is compromised, that's relevant to literally every discussion we have here. And this is an official announcement, the place where an updated canary should be...
Id say its pretty fucking on topic.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Couple of whiny bitches... When you have nothing to rebuttal with in a discussion, you go to name calling. This site was made, as far as i knew, to encourage discussions. Even if it's controversial or something a majority disagrees with, you had a place to go to at least voice your opinion without being shot down simply for being a minority. So what if you two are crazies totally out of line (which your not... Evidence is adding up) i'd rather read that crazy sane goat's thoughts over a pedo's love for harming an innocent child for their own sick pleasure. You know what. Fuck voat. I loved this place when i first heard of it. Love the community. You faggots red pilled me so hard... Nothing left to go back to. But FUCK VOAT! Another prime example of how something beautiful gets manipulated and ruined by the evils of the world.
CivetGenet ago
This place will go the way many other sites have gone. Dying, death, and then relocation. And the new place will be good and sweet and perfect for a while, till it starts dying too. But this cycle doesn't have to be bad, just the natural course of things, so long as we have people willing to help it keep going.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Very true. I'll tag along til the end of days.
CivetGenet ago
I didn't have anything to say back to this, but I see you've been downvoated a ton.
Im bad at formatting, how do I make my letters really large?
The Downvoat button is not the I Disagree button, you numbskulls.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Clearly some people don't want the truth to be spoke.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
actually, the site "runs on donations"
homersimpson made a well put argument against your point a few days ago
that in all reality, without users and user support (financially, spam janitoring, modding, posting content, commenting and having meaningful discussion, etc)
THERE WOULD BE NO VOAT.
you fucking
Cynabuns ago
Only if it reads "Sanitation Overlord" lol
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Yeap... Foreshadowing.
SackOfSteel ago
Shut the fuck up. You guys organize brigades.
6467650? ago
Do you have proof of this accusation, Mr. "6-day-old account"?
SackOfSteel ago
" We are going to implement a “Janitor” mod level. This Janitor level will have restricted permissions. This will allow System subs to take on more Janitors to help purge and discourage SPAM while not being able to perform any other malicious actions that we have been fearful of. I’ve already started working on this and @Cynabuns is going to help us test it. "
Also
" This will allow System subs to take on more Janitors... "
So powermods will be able to recruit their friends (or alts) to be powermods too?
Sounds like this creates a possibility for even more mod abuse.
6467663? ago
From the section you first quoted:
Since they already mentioned that bad moderators adding alts was a problem, I would assume that the Janitor level would not have the ability to add other Level 2 or Janitor mods.
SackOfSteel ago
Incorrect, because somebody in the comments asked Puttitout and he said he didn't know or something like that.
6467711? ago
You literally can't even post a quote or a link to back up your own hatred for the new policy. Just randomly trying to put words into Putt's mouth doesn't help your argument at all.
SackOfSteel ago
If you read the entire thread as well as all the comments you'd know what I was talking about. Hold on a minute.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
welp with that attitude anyone wishing to expose secrets of a large organization just better go home, eh?
who pays the bills? USERS. who gives the time and effort on the code? ADMINS
whose site is it? ALL OF OURS, as "partners" lol olololol.
or have you forgotten what a community is, kev?
because if i remember correctly, a community that cares is a community.
do you not care that voat may be compromised?
fujin ago
Goddamn I keep seeing you trying to start a revolution here and get people in your corner. Are you sure YOU'RE not an infiltrator trying to stir shit up within the community, or have you forgotten what community is SaneGoat.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
yes. i don't want to stir shit up.
i want to know the truth.
i want an ACTUAL platform for free speech. while ALL other major social networks are OPEN about censorship, and the chans have lost canaries/been sold...... voat was the place.
but now, the admins have disappeared, changed, become hostile to users, badged a user for shittalking another, and won't answer simple direct questions about voat.
you tell me.
i want the truth from these admins. when they don't respond, it makes me ask again.
fujin ago
If you feel strongly that way you could choose to change the channel so to speak. Just know that all of your activity (comment, conversations, and then some) are stored and tracked.
When an entity receives a FISA, NS request, etc it's just to make an investigation easier without having to jump through hoops and to be able to use the info in court, however all of this is already being stored and if something were to come up in the future you bet your bottom dollar they already have access to every comment/post on this site.
Have the admins been deleting your comments or interfering on a mass scale and censoring content on here like on reddit? If they were trying to suppress information I'm sure the first thing to go would be eradicating your comments and presence on this site to cover up the conspiracy. I haven't seen it or experienced it personally so to me it still seems like a free speech platform for the most part (which is a fairytale in my opinion).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center
https://nsa.gov1.info/utah-data-center/
https://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/
SaneGoatiSwear ago
look up "soft-censorship," "disinformation tactics," and "list of fallacies"
any time i ask the admins questions about their disappearance, the canary, voat finances, possible partners, why their behaviour changed so dramatically, or about gags/corporate takeovers, they SPECIFICALLY ignore those questions, and i get immediately downvoated to hell. also, puttitout the admin badged a user for massive shittalking comments filled 100% with disinformation tactics and fallacies. wasn't even trying to hide the fact. even admitted it, one of them, at one point (one of the downvoat/shill brigade) that they were totally doing it....
and PUTTITOUT BADGED one of the users for this.
so do i see blatant censorship? of course not, everyone on voat would leave.
but do i see soft censorship? fuck yes.
and yes, i've said before, the u.s., the 5 eyes and others permanently record ALL data going through. this is about SPECIFIC intent, not about general dragnetting.
fujin ago
So why did you completely avoid my question asking if you were an inflitrator? How sure can we be that you're not part of some group like JIDF or CTR or one of the many COINTELPRO cells that exist on the net? You sure are making a big stink of something that these guys have answered and you're beating a dead horse with the canary request, maybe they don't know how to do a proper canary and don't care to do a proper one past the one they've provided because they just haven't received any requests. I've seen at least 3 different versions that they've tried to produce in some way shape or form. It's not like they're legal experts or have tons of money for counsel.
Well look, until you can prove that you're not stirring trying to cause division within the community you will just be one of the other infiltrators that are trying to destroy the community.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
i am not an infiltrator. i am not a shill. i am not amalek. i am not srs, ctr, jidf, any cointelpro group, any gov't, any corp, i never reddited, i am not associated with any org, group, faction, etc et al.
i am literally a lone random goat who can't fucking stand the smell of bullshit.
they have absolutely not answered. they have specifically avoided answering. what planet are you on?
what 3 versions?!
until you prove you're not intending to
fujin ago
Why did you stop replying as soon as I gave you an answer and called you out again?
fujin ago
Am I in la la land? You're quoted paragraph at the end there is EXACTLY what you're doing! You've never reddited and you're on a reddit clone site? WTF is that all about, so you just all of sudden came across a site that's build nearly exactly like reddit by chance. Sounds like a definite infiltrator now stirring the pot.
Here are the three different times Atko has made his versions of canaries, now from my understanding if he were to modify any of these requests the canary would be "poisoned" but you just keep on trying to cause schism and doubt here in the community like you were trained in your COINTELPRO training.
https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/782524/3869500
https://voat.co/v/announcements/163288/437202
https://voat.co/v/announcements/1229666 (where the admins are now writing we have 0 requests after every announcements to try to please complainers like you)
SackOfSteel ago
Lol it's funny watching you unknowingly try to reason with one of the shills and watching him pretend to be unbiased..
SaneGoatiSwear ago
jesus, dvd faster than i could get to the message and read it!
so....
whose site? because atko and puttitout spent years being nothing but nice to users. to disappear and come back and be so meanspirited to users asking legit questions... then badging a user for shittalking another user....
whose site is it, kev?
because atko and puttitout sure seem to be going through some serious PTSD if they haven't been replaced.
edit:Names whoops i forget, these admins aren't those people anymore, afaik.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
kevdude, what are your thoughts about voat being compromised? surely you've seen the evidence that
the admins disappeared at the same time, for a whole month
when they came back, they acted like completely different people, being mean to users for the first time in the history of voat (me, homersimpson, ramblinrambo), they badged a user for shittalking another user, they won't answer simple questions about the integrity of voat regarding injunctions, gags, corporate takeovers, shitty canary, etc. in public, but they'll talk to me in private but always avoid the questions... but won't talk in public at all to me if i bring any of this up... and more...
you are a voice of reason on voat.
what say you, publicly?
SackOfSteel ago
@kevdude is part of the mod and brigade cabal. I hope you know that.
Pawn ago
tell the cabal to suck mah dick.
Failure ago
The cabal bends to no man! but ill still suck your dick
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
dontdoxxmebro ago
Master of Custodial Sciences! or Dr. Jan Itor!
Cynabuns ago
Thank you for taking the time to check me out, happy to answer any questions too
SaneGoatiSwear ago
right? kev, you give me hope i'm not alone in believing that it's normal to have open discussions about possible issues with the platform we use to discuss...
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
@she, @exisredditus, many others
I did not fight tooth and nail over eggnog at all, I had nothing to do with any of that. I did not even know who mathgrunt was until you started to accuse me of "supporting cancer mods". If I don't say something about a mod, I am supporting cancer mods, according to you.
If I comment on an announcement about mods then my opinion is not valid because I'm pretending to be a crusader against mod abuse.
What the fuck do you want from me? What do I need to do to stop your dick from getting hard every time you see me make a comment about mods?
Crensch ago
micdrop
SaneGoatiSwear ago
lol purge.
no this fucking site is compromised. that's the last thing i ever wanted to say. i love voat. it's home.
but they fucking killed our home
and now any attempts to talk to the admins about 1. finances, 2. the canary missing 6 types of gags in the statement and lacking trap statement, and 3. what happened why they disappeared the same time and why they came back acting like different people and now 4. why the fuck won't they answer any of this directly. the admins both talk to me in private, but now ignore me in public. they won't answer these questions in either setting.
TLDR: what the current canary is: a fucking joke. there could be an injunction, super-injunction, publication ban (and other than some skype message to another person from supposedly--putt "no gags" there still may be gags in general (gov't, corporate, ongoing investigation, we don't know!) and they won't answer.
they just keep saying
SOONTM
PuttItOut ago
I didn't know the answer to this so didn't reply, but my thinking is in system subs all "mods" should be at a janitor level but then again we've had some really good Level 2 mods in system subs.
Cuckbot ago
Still you have a situation where right now someone can recruit a malicious user, alts, advertisers(this is the real problem) to a system sub with no input from users or admins.
What real need is there for level 2 users to be able to recruit other level 2 users that cant be handled via subverserequest if the level 1 goes missing? It's been bought up many times before and considering what happened to v/askvoat and the alt user fiasco v/worldnews(?) it's kinda hard to understand why its still a thing.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
what's the point of no spam, if there are no users?
if everyone knew that voat was compromised
and left.
hey putt why don't you just answer the question?
TAThatBoomerang ago
I don't really have much to say other than really appreciating the transparency.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
what transparency?
TAThatBoomerang ago
Well it's a whole lot more than I'm used to at least.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
well before they disappeared a couple months ago, the admins were super friendly and very forthcoming and straightforward with information.
since they've returned,
they've been mean to users who ask questions, avoid talking to users, have badged a user for shittalking a user, and have given us specific avoidance on certain questions that lead to the fact that there's an ongoing investigation into voat AND that voat has been takenover at the corporate level and now serves a new agenda.
this is jack shit for transparency, although yes, i agree, compared to the last couple months, is more than it was recently.
PM_ME_UR_NOODZ ago
I frequent /new, the spam's not that bad. Janitorial spam removal can be misused as well. Be careful.
Cynabuns ago
I agree that stripping the OP from user-deleted posts|comments should stay.
Leaving-in the OP when a mod deletes a post will allow for the monitoring of spammers, and even abusive users. It would be nice to have that history to show all the post removals for a particular user; it will come in super handy too for tracking which spam accounts are doing the most damage and are worthy for an Admin ban (I will not have this ability as a Spam Janitor, but I have already submitted a few posts to v/ReportSpammers)
Owlchemy ago
Is that the plan @Cynabuns ... we continue to report spam directly to v/reportspammers ... then you'll review and scrub if necessary? I post to many smaller subs where I see it and have begun to report ... will continue to use that avenue, if it's the way you plan to achieve this. BTW, this system should be a big plus IMHO ... I know some have concerns, but something needs to be done before spam gets out of hand and this is as good a solution as any.
Cynabuns ago
If I see and delete spam in one of the subs, and the domain looks repetitious, then I'll make sure that it gets reported to v/ReportSpammers (or I'll check to see if someone else has already reported it). If I happen into a sub that I don't mod or act as janitor, I will go back to the normal routine of downvoting and putting in a report. I have been given no ability to do anything with the info or the reports at v/ReportSpammers - this is an Admin deal to add bans of domains or users as they deem necessary.
Owlchemy ago
Cool, just curious how we could get the spam reports to you for a look see. I'll keep reporting to v/reportspammers which will queue you and admins in. Otherwise, life goes on - LOL. Good luck with your assignment ... it is a needed function.
Cynabuns ago
The spam reports are there for all to see but there's sooooo many now that it really wouldn't help me to see them in advance before I go and do my sanitation scans. Thanks for the luck! :)
SaneGoatiSwear ago
to be entirely fair, you stopped. i stopped. we cease-fired.
i however will not be silent with your behavior.
you can "claim" all you want, but the fact remains,
after i was laughing and moving on from all this,
you woke up every day and downvoated me for a month straight.
don't worry
once i made the choice to ask questions of voat (when the admins disappeared the same time for a month and came back different people),
i've had a steady stream of shills and downvoaters on me for it, because clearly voat is compromised and a team of people are tasked with silencing any dissent on it.
RobotTiger ago
People could likely be downvoating you because your attitude shows you to be a twatwaffle. Wahhh everyone that downvoats me is the same guy that I have animus towards! Conspiracy against me! I'm the most important person and the universe and the only person who's voice matters!
Definitely a twatwaffle.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
I've read for months now that specific groups we're being paid to shill certain sites. Voat was one of those sites. I wish i could find a source rn but imm sure a few searches on voat will pop something up.
Nerobot ago
Easy to get around so why bother? https://voat.co/user/Cynabuns_bot
Cynabuns ago
I use this for testing site issues and working on CSS; my posts and comments are an open book, not to mention that I don't have have enough points to do anything. This is no different than many other users here.
6467428? ago
It is allowing you to mod 11 subs at the moment.
Cynabuns ago
I was trying to keep my work transparent by keeping with my original username. There are some here that have used completely unrelated usernames and that didn't seem right to me.
PuttItOut ago
In code I'm calling it "Content Mass Murderer"
SaneGoatiSwear ago
foreshadowing?
foreshadowing.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
My exact thought....
Cynabuns ago
I get the shirt for this, right, Right?! Aww, c'mon, at least a sticker for my broom then.
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Ok, I'm done, I just wanted to voice my concerns about this feature and I can not be bothered to deal with you.
The issue is not exclusive to cynabuns, other users will be able to mod an infinite amount of subs and delete anything they like. This is not a "me vs you" debate, I'm trying to shed light on how bad this could get, if you don't want to talk about that, then that's fine.
>conveniently forgets my criticism of mods on multiple system subs because it doesn't fit the agenda
piratse ago
@puttitout, there may be a solution that can please everyone. But I'm sure it has its own flaws. If you insist on janitors, and you are super busy, you should try something ALONG THE LINES of a checks and balances. If someone wants to delete a ton of user s or goes on a delete spree, there should be another level of mods that monitor that, and they can be messaged by users concerned about censorship. Those mods would relay to you any issues that need to be addressed by the site owners. They don't have the power to ban mods, it's just a community over watch, that when they message you, you know it's serious. Here's how you keep that in check, those users must have X amount of time on the site, X amount of comments and/or submissions and X amount of upvotes. Here's the kicker, to prevent abuse, those are limited time permissions. 6 months, year, whatever. Think of it like your state Rep. Except they can't be voted back in. On the main page could be the user names of the current overwatch team and mod team. You would only need a few people each time. One term. Just a thought.
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Mods can be contained to 10 subs. These new mods can't be contained to 10 subs, they can mod any number of subs. Which is why this is a terrible idea, and would be seen in a different light if the moderator in question was a different user.
lbruiser ago
Can we have another t shirt run? Also can we have posts that haven't been voated on show up on frontpage feed?
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
If you would have a problem with it being me in the same position, then don't support the position in the first place. If you think anyone can abuse it, why would you think it is a good idea?
I'm not even getting into the pepe stuff, I have said countless times that I posted 1 picture of a pepe to your sub, let's not get personal.
DigitalRefugee ago
Perhaps @Cynabuns could make an introduction to detail who they are and what their competencies are, as well as their vision for Voat.
Cynabuns ago
Well, my user history is an open book, literally. I've been here for almost 1.5 years and have watched the site, and all the improvements, grow like mad. I am a mod at v/cakes, v/introductions, v/gifs, v/lego, v/protectvoat, and I have a sub, v/cynabuns, where I play around to work on other subs' CSS and I test out site issues that others have reported. I upvote almost everything and downvote spam like crazy. My vision for Voat is to see it stay free of infectious mods who don't share the same values as the site and that it remains free for everyone to have their say (I was not paid to say this, lol). I enjoy the community and the ability to have conversations like adults. I call this place on the interwebz my home. As for my janitorial role, only posts or comments that are very clearly advertising spam will be removed; if there's any question as to whether something is or isn't spam, it stays and the votes will have to handle it. I'd rather err on the side of leaving something be than to accidentally delete something.
DigitalRefugee ago
Very good. Carry on.
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Yes there is a janitor mod there now. They are deleting spam at the moment, but I'm not talking about what they've done in the past couple of days, I'm talking about what's going to happen in the future if this becomes a common feature on the site.
It is strange to see you defending something that could breed the kind of problems you talk about potentially happening on Voat. I wonder if you would be doing the same if it was myself in control of 5 system subs.
DeltaBravoTango ago
You're alive!
6466718? ago
Nowhere does it say that existing 2nd level mods will be restricted from recruiting other lvl2 mods with full power. Currently they can do that.
Codewow ago
l2 mods on a system sub would likely be reduced to janitor positions.
6468823? ago
That would be common sense.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
@puttitout what about this? l2 mods being able to pull in more l2 mods...
is that an issue?
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Why the downvoats? You didn't even voice an opinion on whether you agreed or disagreed on this being an issue...
weezkitty ago
People shouldn't worry about such things. Spam is a big problem in system subs and if the mod situation doesn't work, it can be undone
But I can see where the concerns come from considering the cluster fuck that happened over on reddit. Just remember, the big problem with reddit was corrupt admins. So far, this hasn't been an issue with voat
SackOfSteel ago
" Don't worry about it Goyim, don't even think about it"
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
Yep. /v/Whatever.
Unfortunately it will be modded by janitor mods now.
CANCEL-CAT-FACTS ago
If you look at the overview page for @Cynabuns it is obvious that this user has consistently been trying to help voat grow and improve this community for everyone. Thanks.
@HenryCorp
dontdoxxmebro ago
It is that road to hell thing. Apparently they pave it with the intentions of good people. I wonder if that was a union contract?
Cynabuns ago
Thank you, CCF!
@HenryCorp
piratse ago
My problem is that @cynabuns isn't the problem in himself. It's the slippery slope. It's happened to every site like this, and it starts this way. 4chan and Reddit being the biggest examples. The problem with slippery slopes is that you can't stop them (short of ending the site). Intentions today are good, then it takes one fuck like @henrycorp to turn this place into a shit hole. It's the owners site, they can do whatever they want. Doesn't mean it is the right thing.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
the admins recently badged a user for shittalking another user.
they're completely replaced by sjws or they already were.
the slippery slope started with whoaverse - it was made by atif to be a safe-space for fee--fees.
he only changed his tune and allowed raycisists because well userbase.
that slippery slope has always been here...i mean technically, anyway...
i want a working platform for free speech on the net. i don't care where it is; i like voat and wish it were that platform, but the admins won't answer simple questions like:
"do you have any injunctions, super-injunctions, publication bans, on you/voat?"
PuttItOut ago
Yes, I will check it out today. Need to do transfers first and read all the hate mail. ;)
sinjinsmythe ago
Thank you for making and maintaining this website. I don't know much about code and what you described about managing Voat, but I do love this place and really appreciate all the work that has gone in and continues to go in here. Thanks again.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
no
derkatalog is a troll
he will fuck subs up
he spent every day for a month downvoating me, for a total of 1,700 downvoats on my account,
all because he got pissed when i sourced an argument and he could only muster personal attacks and fallacies.
this user is extremely spiteful and is not a good fit anywhere near big subs and positions of power.
oh here come the downvoat brigades! save voat from mean old sanegoat! he wants there to be a good canary, he wants a voat that isn't compromised! o noes!
anyone downvoating is for troll mods and compromised voat
whisky_cat ago
Considering Voat is hosted on CloudFare, the canary really doesn't matter. If you're truly at risk of government intervention I sure hope you've been running a tight knit VPN 100% of the time.
I like you SaneGoat but this hyperbole is easy to knock. "A Good Canary", give me a break, even if they had a good one, your privacy, and perhaps even the website, is subject to otherwise infiltrations which a canary will not cover.
fwiw I didn't down vote, but for the second time I can't see how a text post for a theoretical canary is going to change jack shit about Voat in its current state. Do you petition CloudFare for a canary, especially as passionate as here?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
whisky, as i've said before, the u.s. gov't (, the 5 eyes, and others) all participate in mass-data-gathering.. every phone call, every text every ounce of data from every on camera on a phone and mic on a phone -- - all goes to hard storage for ai review and flagging, and human flag-checking.
i'm well aware.
that has NOTHING to do with the canary.
that's all passive surveillance. all should be well aware of it. but the canary allows us to know if there's SPECIFIC surveillance.
this canary ONLY PROTECTS AGAINST National Security Letters and Fisa court requests. it DOES NOT PROTECT against Publication Bans, Injunctions, Super-Injunctions, or literally any regular gag, from a judge, from a company, from a government.
it's the second shittiest canary i can find.
i agree about cloudflare, it's in the bin of "never use" services. don't know why a "free speech site" uses cloudflare, and asking them for a canary would be like asking the cia for one.
no worries, there's a whole sjw brigade on my ass every time i speak up about the truth of voat being compromised.
the canary just lets us know about SPECIFIC information, if complete.
as it is, it only gives us SPECIFIC information on ns/fisa. not on the rest. since they won't update it, we must take that and the 100% avoidance of any questions about it as the legal term SPECIFIC SILENCE and infer that voat is compromised, SPECIFICALLY, lol not just that passive surveillance always on.
whisky_cat ago
They use CloudFare because they had a microscopic audience in the beginning and it's probably the most affordable DDoS protection they could get on short notice.
Is Voat "compromised"? Sure. There are plenty of definitions for that. Most sites I go to provide significantly less info than Voat as it is. And I'm not conceding there's "a lot" of info being provided, which is common during transitions, I suspect one is quite possible. Most "legit" websites are instead shrouded by 10-20 page Terms of Service documents nobody will ever read. Sorry I used too many quotes for emphasis but you get the idea.
That said, put up good content bro, I'm aware Voat has it's challenges and won't pretend to believe we're being told everything transparently or under the advisement of anything potentially nefarious, such is life.
e: I up'd as I'm not a fag
mamwad ago
Are you still planning on updating the user agreement? It's important to know what privileges mod-users have in their own subs when it comes to curating content and what rights users have in specific subs.
PuttItOut ago
Yes. We've 100% slipped on this because of the delicacy of the wording.
mamwad ago
Yeah, it is a delicate situation. It is going to be tough to respect the right for small niche subs with unpopular content to exist without interference from the hivemind and still respect user freedom. Keep working at it please!
SackOfSteel ago
They've created the powermod position to empower /ProtectVoat which is the mod and brigade cabal.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
mamwad
these admins disappeared the same day for a month.
came back different people
won't answer simple questions on finances, voat transparency, what happened to them for a month, why the canary is so woefully underwritten...
then, if you ask questions, you will get brigaded and the shills brigading you will get badged by the admins for doing it.
voat is compromised.
act accordingly.
i will remove that statement when the admins answer these simple questions (in the negative, of course. if they admit this shit.. .then :(
6466653? ago
Where?
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
I'd still like confirmation because it sounds pretty sketchy imo
SaneGoatiSwear ago
the warrant canary needs to be updated putt
THE ONLY REASON YOU'RE NOT UPDATING THIS IS BECAUSE THERE'S SOMETHING IN IT THAT YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO SAY
you talk about
yet
here, let me show you what it is supposed to look like:
anyone downvoating is for a compromised voat. it's a downvoat brigade look at that
they're scared you'll find out the truth about voat being fucked.
6466715? ago
Every single time an admin says anything you flip the fuck out and try to find something to lash out about.
You're a troll. Shut up.
middle_path ago
Not a troll. Perhaps over concerned.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Somebody has to be...
CivetGenet ago
Every time an admin says anything he points this out, because that's how you get the admins attention and be sure they know what a complete warrant canary looks like.
He's not "trying to find something to lash out about", he's pointing out the fact that NS/FISA requests do not cover all things that could gag voat. Unless you can show us where this is factually incorrect, then you're wrong.
NS/FISA does not cover everything there is. SaneGoat is telling the admins this and describing a much broader canary. Considering they've seen this before yet have not changed the canary, then they must not be capable of saying the full thing. Otherwise, why wouldn't they? What's the point of a canary if they dont care about alerting us?
SaneGoatiSwear ago
everything you've said in this comment is wrong,
but the brigade upvoated you because you support their mission in silencing open discussion about voat.
why on a "have your say" platform can i not bring up simple issues like
where did the admins disappear to on the same day for a month?
why won't you update the warrant canary?
do you have any injunctions, publication bans, super-injunctions on you/voat?
if you think asking these questions of sjw admins (admitted by atko that whoaverse was an sjw fee-fee protection spot initially) who badge users for trolling people asking questions, and yell at people and call them names for asking questions (like homersimpson, mod of fph) is "trolling"
then you sir are fucking retarded.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
you know i support you modding v/science.
way to start a discussion, rabbi
putt keeps dropping this canary like it's not something dead the cat dragged into your kitchen.
are you trying to tell me to be silent? are your fee--fee's hurt over the internet?
i'll speak up for your rights to freely speak up. i'll fight for your right to freely speak. even when you come at me and try to shut me up, i will defend your right to say it.
6466609? ago
Why are level 2 mods on system subs still allowed to invite other level 2 mods then? Users are being added all the time to system subs with no vetting at all by admins.
HomerSimpson ago
Or. They can implement a system where the head mod can give specifics like reddit such as adding or removing mods. They shouldn't remove shit.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
"we have had 0 (zero) gag orders, National Security Requests, FISA orders, injunctions, super-injunctions, publication bans, nor any other free-speech prohibiting action against us nor against voat nor against any signed-in user of voat nor against any guest user nor against any groups of any type of users to the date of the last posting of this notification - - as well, up to that point, voat has been neither a trap of any kind nor has it up to that point been a honeypot. if this notification is not posted or no announcements are made (one) month to the second after the previous announcement, consider voat compromised and act accordingly."
if puttitout and atko won't update the canary,
then there's something in the canary they can't say.
eagleshigh ago
Soooooo was the notification updated after the first month of the previous announcement?
CivetGenet ago
Downvoats with NO rebuttal to what you said. If you dont agree with the above statement or find it factually incorrect, theres a little REPLY button you can click, you fuck faces. How fucking retarded and self-entitled do you need to be to be laying scrolling through Voat, see something that hurts your fee fees or rustles your jimmies, and click a little button to force your displeasure onto another person. As if your opinions and emotions matter at all. You want to say something, fucking say it.
All you lazy fucks on Voat are ruining this God damn site with your mindless clicks, adding nothing except to work towards crippling another user because you felt displeased about something. Choke on a fucking cock you downvoating whores.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
shit viv. i'm trying to be level headed here,
but yeah
it's fucking clear as all nigger fuck these shitfucking retards are brigading and atko and putt are in on it. they badged one of these users p0ssum for shilling for them.
as far as i know and now i will be clearly stating this like a @henrycorp ping from cancel,
there is an ongoing investigation into at least the user hecho on voat, and there is a gag on the admins to keep quiet about it.
there has been a major change in who actually owns and operates voat, and it's probably reddit's parent company.
proof:
the admins show SPECIFIC silence when asked these questions, for OVER A MONTH NOW, after disappearing for a month at the same time and coming back meanspirited for the first time in the history of voat. the admins now badge users for soft-censorship shill tactics. and downvoat brigades are permanent on any attempt to openly discuss voat.
CivetGenet ago
Just pisses me the fuck off. That many downvoats and not a single fucking reply. This is why Voat is going to shit, regardless of whether its compromised or not. Userbase has gotten fucking lazy and fake.
SackOfSteel ago
Voat is comprised. If you raise a valid issue concerning the site you'll get brigaded and driven into account restrictions. They silence discussion. Voat is compromised and it's not even open source anymore. They haven't updated the source on Github after modifying it a bunch.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
civ, it's a fucking sjw brigade that works for the new owners of voat. they are attempting to soft-censor dissent against the new reddit-for-the-right, voat, inc, a subsidiary of ______ whomever (advance, reddit, conde nast, who gives a shit) that they BADGED a user for this behavior shows you this is admin - approved.
voat is compromised.
new voat need be made.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
I've asked for about 2-3 months now where the new voat will be when this falls out entirely. If it hasn't already...
Crazyjoe33 ago
No kidding. Power hungry fucks are the worst.
PM_ME_YOUR_ARCHES ago
So the janitor mods will be able to mod any number of subverses?
Doesn't this mean that there is a huge potential for a powermod situation if people can mod unlimited subs and delete posts?
Edit: Quick guys, he's making valid points, better downvote him so nobody can see.
Nesano ago
I'm always disappointed in humanity when somebody is given a reason to say something like that.
Disappointed ago
They should be restricted to at maximum 5(I don't even like that but I understand 3 would mean more janitors also) and maybe even rotate them to a different set of 5 every so often.
Techius ago
You're only saying this because Cynabuns has 5 subs already. If it was someone from a non-PV sub you'd be calling for a maximum of 3, then if you didn't get your own way you'd start a conversation on PV where you'd plan out a witch hunt. I've seen it happen before.
Disappointed ago
Modding Cynabuns first was massive mistake. Don't play your bullshit with me.
Techius ago
Modding him at all was a mistake. He should of never been modded in the first place. There was no issues with spam before the dude got modded as it was getting downvoted by the users, now the admins expect a single person to attack spam on 5 different subs. Given how long it takes to "delete" (more like just transfer it go another place) shit, I wouldn't be surprised if he got burned out with this in a week.
Calm your tits.
Disappointed ago
It wont just be a single person it will be more eventually. The restrictions are bullshit as well because you can't differentiate between spam and a normal post. They will have the same powers to delete as a normal mod.
Techius ago
Where from? We could be allowing some authoritarian fucktard to have the ability to delete posts, then the cycle of problems begin like what happened last year.
I agree to some degree. Maybe instead of text posts to have the ability to be deleted, we leave this to linkposts only, though if a text post has a URL in it, it should have the function available to be deleted. Even that has it's limits though because there's no way to organise between a text post and a link post. I don't expect a feature like that to be implemented either, knowing how long the admins take.
That's one of my worries.
Disappointed ago
Exactly.
Ina_Pickle ago
Exactly. This is why I finally am siding with our resident conspiracy theorists. The real Atko and Puttitout would never have allowed this situation, much less created it
Cuckbot ago
There definitely needs to be limits on this.
Fambida ago
Yes it does. Janitor deletions will have to be subject to the same transparency as any other. Note who deleted something, the reason why, and have deletions be searchable by deleter so patterns are easy to detect.
HarveyHarveyJones ago
Easy to detect... Like how easy it is to see henrycorps' obvious powermodding. Easy to detect but nothing to be done to stop it.
Cynabuns ago
In fact, @Puttitout:
If you could do two things codewise to keep things on the up-and-up:
These will be helpful to all mods sitewide.
PuttItOut ago
Will look into both of these points. @Atko said he will implement the "reason for deletion" I think.
Cuckbot ago
Remember the anon subs when considering leaving names in deleted comments, Mister Goat.
Cynabuns ago
Cool. Thanks!
awshidahak ago
I do not understand how some comments get downvoated.
omegletrollz ago
I downvoted the last comment. My reason was because the comment's content itself could be just an upvote instead. The act of upvoting is enough to say "I like this" and "thank you for this", which is exactly what was in the text. I don't want Voat to become reddit where among the top comment's there always some bullshit like "that's rad" or "that's interesting, thank you" - it's useless, worthless white noise and I'd rather have people either make an intelligent comment or shut up. The fact that Cynabuns was mentioned in the OP doesn't make him any different from any of us: if he has nothing to say he can just get the fuck out (nothing against him, just his dumb comment). As the comment has 6 downvotes so far I think I'm talking for the others as well here.
More generically though, I often think, like many others about "how could someone downvote this" and thought a lot about it. I'll use posts/submissions as example since it's clearer: maybe it's a piece of content that has been reposted and you didn't notice; maybe it's video/audio/writing with low quality but not enough to bother yourself; maybe the downvoter knows for a fact that the content is misleading/inaccurate/outdated while you're none-the-wiser on it; maybe he's seen it elsewhere already; etc. My point: there are plenty of reasons to downvote, even what seems to be perfectly innocuous, legitimate content. If you really can't understand downvotes you need to realize the world is bigger than you and other people have other expectations, judgments and thresholds.
Cynabuns ago
I can tell you that from the deletions so far, I copy and paste the post title and the submitter's name in my comment before deleting so that all is recorded in the mod logs.
Fambida ago
Rock on, and with just you as a janitor that's perfectly sufficient. If we get more than one we'll need some of that to be automated though so no one can "forget" to include the info. I could easily see a janitor revenge deleting HenryCorps' submissions, for instance.
Cynabuns ago
Thanks for the confidence vote.
Maybe some sort of popup modal with all fields requiring completion
PuttItOut ago
This is something we will need to think about. I don't have the answer for this yet.
6467475? ago
Perhaps have "crews" for certain sets of subs that relate to one another? I don't know how well it would work, I just came up with it really quickly.
2716057 ago
I'm sure you'll figure it out (I have faith in you guys), but it's kind of scary that we don't have a plan in place before we implement this.
PuttItOut ago
Yeah, I agree. We are just so crazy busy that this is the best we can do right now, which isn't half bad considering all the inputs.
SaneGoatiSwear ago
ignore me.
and i get louder.
fix the canary.
answer the questions.
let voat move on.
this is becoming very clear that voat is compromised
seeing that you avoid answering only these questions
consistently.
make a response, j.
2716057 ago
Oh, no... I TOTALLY understand. You guys are doing a GREAT job, and I appreciate it.
But I'd almost be willing to let a few more spammers get another wave, or two, in -- letting the community mod itself as it has been doing -- in order to work out the finer details, and get this right from the get-go and avoid any unforseen problems.